frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: Identifier for files and directories (like ISBN for Books)

https://github.com/skorotkiewicz/fsid
1•modinfo•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Holy Grail: Open-Source Autonomous Development Agent

https://github.com/dakotalock/holygrailopensource
1•Moriarty2026•8m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Minecraft Creeper meets 90s Tamagotchi

https://github.com/danielbrendel/krepagotchi-game
1•foxiel•15m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Termiteam – Control center for multiple AI agent terminals

https://github.com/NetanelBaruch/termiteam
1•Netanelbaruch•16m ago•0 comments

The only U.S. particle collider shuts down

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/particle-collider-shuts-down-brookhaven
1•rolph•18m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Why do purchased B2B email lists still have such poor deliverability?

1•solarisos•19m ago•2 comments

Show HN: Remotion directory (videos and prompts)

https://www.remotion.directory/
1•rokbenko•21m ago•0 comments

Portable C Compiler

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_C_Compiler
2•guerrilla•23m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Kokki – A "Dual-Core" System Prompt to Reduce LLM Hallucinations

1•Ginsabo•23m ago•0 comments

Software Engineering Transformation 2026

https://mfranc.com/blog/ai-2026/
1•michal-franc•25m ago•0 comments

Microsoft purges Win11 printer drivers, devices on borrowed time

https://www.tomshardware.com/peripherals/printers/microsoft-stops-distrubitng-legacy-v3-and-v4-pr...
3•rolph•25m ago•1 comments

Lunch with the FT: Tarek Mansour

https://www.ft.com/content/a4cebf4c-c26c-48bb-82c8-5701d8256282
2•hhs•28m ago•0 comments

Old Mexico and her lost provinces (1883)

https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/77881/pg77881-images.html
1•petethomas•31m ago•0 comments

'AI' is a dick move, redux

https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/notes/2026/note-on-debating-llm-fans/
4•cratermoon•33m ago•0 comments

The source code was the moat. But not anymore

https://philipotoole.com/the-source-code-was-the-moat-no-longer/
1•otoolep•33m ago•0 comments

Does anyone else feel like their inbox has become their job?

1•cfata•33m ago•1 comments

An AI model that can read and diagnose a brain MRI in seconds

https://www.michiganmedicine.org/health-lab/ai-model-can-read-and-diagnose-brain-mri-seconds
2•hhs•36m ago•0 comments

Dev with 5 of experience switched to Rails, what should I be careful about?

1•vampiregrey•39m ago•0 comments

AlphaFace: High Fidelity and Real-Time Face Swapper Robust to Facial Pose

https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16429
1•PaulHoule•40m ago•0 comments

Scientists discover “levitating” time crystals that you can hold in your hand

https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2026/february/scientists-discover--levitating--t...
2•hhs•42m ago•0 comments

Rammstein – Deutschland (C64 Cover, Real SID, 8-bit – 2019) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VReIuv1GFo
1•erickhill•42m ago•0 comments

Tell HN: Yet Another Round of Zendesk Spam

4•Philpax•42m ago•0 comments

Postgres Message Queue (PGMQ)

https://github.com/pgmq/pgmq
1•Lwrless•46m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Django-rclone: Database and media backups for Django, powered by rclone

https://github.com/kjnez/django-rclone
2•cui•49m ago•1 comments

NY lawmakers proposed statewide data center moratorium

https://www.niagara-gazette.com/news/local_news/ny-lawmakers-proposed-statewide-data-center-morat...
2•geox•50m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw AI chatbots are running amok – these scientists are listening in

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00370-w
3•EA-3167•50m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI agent forgets user preferences every session. This fixes it

https://www.pref0.com/
6•fliellerjulian•53m ago•0 comments

Introduce the Vouch/Denouncement Contribution Model

https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/pull/10559
2•DustinEchoes•55m ago•0 comments

Show HN: SSHcode – Always-On Claude Code/OpenCode over Tailscale and Hetzner

https://github.com/sultanvaliyev/sshcode
1•sultanvaliyev•55m ago•0 comments

Microsoft appointed a quality czar. He has no direct reports and no budget

https://jpcaparas.medium.com/microsoft-appointed-a-quality-czar-he-has-no-direct-reports-and-no-b...
3•RickJWagner•57m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: AI that reviews legal contracts in 12 minutes instead of 2 hours

https://legaldeepai.netlify.app
1•sumanthchary•4mo ago
I built LegalDeep AI after spending $800 on legal review for a simple partnership agreement. The lawyer found 3 risky clauses in 2 hours that my AI now identifies in 12 minutes.

What it does:

Scans contracts and legal documents for risks

Identifies problematic clauses with 95% accuracy

Provides plain-English explanations of legal risks

Suggests safer alternative language

Works completely offline (no sensitive data uploaded)

Technical details:

Built with React/Node.js + Python AI backend

Trained on 10K+ legal contracts and case law

Uses fine-tuned language models + legal knowledge graphs

SOC 2 compliant infrastructure

Processes PDFs, Word docs, and plain text

Why this matters: Legal review costs $200-500/hour. Small businesses either skip it (risky) or pay thousands (painful). This makes legal protection accessible to everyone.

Current traction:

127 legal professionals in beta testing

$2.1K MRR after 6 weeks

Average time savings: 91% vs manual review

Works with contracts, NDAs, employment agreements, leases

Try it: https://legaldeepai.netlify.app (free during beta, no signup required)

The most surprising finding: 70% of users aren't lawyers - they're entrepreneurs and small business owners who couldn't afford proper legal review before.

Looking for feedback on:

What legal documents cause you the most headaches?

What would make you trust an AI with legal analysis?

How do you currently handle contract review?

Happy to answer questions about the tech stack, training data, or legal accuracy validation.

Comments

jqpabc123•4mo ago
Can we sue for damages and liability if the review is flawed?
zahlman•4mo ago
^ This is important. People pay thousands for reasons related to due diligence, liability and legitimacy, not because they struggle with fancy uses of English. (Contract drafters are often advised to avoid certain stereotypical formulas.)
jqpabc123•4mo ago
This is the premise behind *legal* licensing of professionals --- like doctors and lawyers and engineers.

AI doesn't really offer anything new here.

It has always been possible to get these jobs done faster and cheaper --- if you're willing to ignore a few little nagging issues like quality and liability and *legality*.

Review of legal contracts is not just about what is being said but also what should be said that isn't.

Can AI do this level of analysis as well as a licensed professional? Color me skeptical. But as always, your mileage may vary.

sumanthchary•4mo ago
LegalDeep AI isn't build for replacing the Licensed Professionals, it's build for making there life easier and increasing there productivity. This tool might save there time and money.

LegalDeep AI just gives you summaries and analysis not perfect data to share with clients without review by user himself. They can use this for help.

jqpabc123•4mo ago
So it is mainly for use by *lawyers*?

This contradicts your original post where you appear to suggest it can be used to avoid paying lawyers. Along with the fact that you are posting in a technical forum rather than a legal one.

sumanthchary•4mo ago
No the review will not be flawed. The Documents will be analyzed by AI and it will answer what's on document only.
jqpabc123•4mo ago
No the review will not be flawed.

Put this into writing in your terms of service and I will ask my lawyer to review it.

By the way, where are your terms of service?