Sora 2 has been gaining attention as a new AI video generation tool, and I recently had the chance to try it out through sora2ai.online. While the technology is impressive in many ways, it’s important to highlight some of the limitations that users might encounter.
Strengths of Sora 2
On the positive side, Sora 2 makes video generation accessible to more people. It is easy to get started, and the overall workflow feels smooth compared to other AI tools I’ve tested. For anyone curious about experimenting with AI-generated content, Sora 2 definitely lowers the entry barrier.
Current Limitations
However, after spending some time with the tool, I noticed several drawbacks that could affect the overall user experience:
• Lack of control over video length
At the moment, Sora 2 does not allow precise control of video duration. This means you can’t decide whether your output should be 10 seconds, 30 seconds, or longer — the system handles it automatically, which can be frustrating if you have specific needs.
• Watermark on generated videos
Every video produced by Sora 2 comes with a visible watermark. While understandable for a tool that is still being tested, it limits the usability of the content for professional or commercial purposes.
• Blurry visuals
One of the biggest issues is that many generated videos look blurry. The lack of sharpness and fine detail makes the results feel unfinished and not suitable for high-quality projects.
Sora 2 is an exciting step forward in AI-powered video generation, but it is still in an early stage. If you’re just experimenting for fun or exploring what AI can do, it’s worth a try. You can check it out at sora2ai.online.
That said, if you’re looking for polished, production-ready results, you may find the current limitations — such as the watermark, lack of control over length, and blurry visuals — to be deal-breakers.
Like many AI tools, Sora 2 will likely improve over time. For now, it’s best to approach it as a preview of what’s coming in the future rather than a fully mature solution.
lion__93332•4mo ago
Strengths of Sora 2
On the positive side, Sora 2 makes video generation accessible to more people. It is easy to get started, and the overall workflow feels smooth compared to other AI tools I’ve tested. For anyone curious about experimenting with AI-generated content, Sora 2 definitely lowers the entry barrier.
Current Limitations
However, after spending some time with the tool, I noticed several drawbacks that could affect the overall user experience: • Lack of control over video length At the moment, Sora 2 does not allow precise control of video duration. This means you can’t decide whether your output should be 10 seconds, 30 seconds, or longer — the system handles it automatically, which can be frustrating if you have specific needs. • Watermark on generated videos Every video produced by Sora 2 comes with a visible watermark. While understandable for a tool that is still being tested, it limits the usability of the content for professional or commercial purposes. • Blurry visuals One of the biggest issues is that many generated videos look blurry. The lack of sharpness and fine detail makes the results feel unfinished and not suitable for high-quality projects.
Sora 2 is an exciting step forward in AI-powered video generation, but it is still in an early stage. If you’re just experimenting for fun or exploring what AI can do, it’s worth a try. You can check it out at sora2ai.online.
That said, if you’re looking for polished, production-ready results, you may find the current limitations — such as the watermark, lack of control over length, and blurry visuals — to be deal-breakers.
Like many AI tools, Sora 2 will likely improve over time. For now, it’s best to approach it as a preview of what’s coming in the future rather than a fully mature solution.