Not actually a dupe: unlike the story you linked, this article has a lot of background on the issue for those who don't follow Ruby community drama.
ChrisArchitect•4mo ago
Then share it over there in the very large discussion. The point is the discussion is over there.
camtarn•4mo ago
No, that serves a completely different purpose: I don't want to read through a very large discussion when this perfectly good article is here. Hence my point. You know this already, as you already change your wording depending on whether you're pointing to a duplicate article, or a valid article but where there's discussion elsewhere.
You could just admit that you made a trivial mistake on a post that's already fallen off the front page, you know. And then we wouldn't both have wasted our time.
ChrisArchitect•4mo ago
camtarn•4mo ago
ChrisArchitect•4mo ago
camtarn•4mo ago
You could just admit that you made a trivial mistake on a post that's already fallen off the front page, you know. And then we wouldn't both have wasted our time.