Building a JavaScript Runtime using C

https://devlogs.xyz/blog/building-a-javaScript-runtime

84•redbell•4mo ago

Comments

TheCleric•3mo ago

I was a little disappointed that this was “just” a wrapper for JavaScriptCore.

jesse__•3mo ago

Yeah, I was expecting a lot more than "I glued some libraries together in C!", especially when the author is claiming 'from scratch'. Seems like a somewhat disingenuous title if you ask me..

jakogut•3mo ago

I suppose when your accustomed level of abstraction is interpreted languages like JavaScript, and "the web", "gluing some libraries together in C" is a somewhat novel and interesting endeavor.

jesse__•3mo ago

I bit my tongue and decided to hold that jab at JavaScript programmers, but yeah, I think that's exactly what were looking at here

jakogut•3mo ago

I wasn't trying to make any jabs, just an observation that getting outside of your comfort zone can be novel and interesting, even if it's mundane to people that commonly spend lots of time there.

Minor49er•3mo ago

Agreed. It contradicts the whole "from scratch" idea. The article even has an engine implementation section where it just calls JavaScriptCore as you mentioned. It's a cool wrapper, but a misleading and disappointing article

trollied•3mo ago

Yup. I clicked on it, based on the title, and expected a long-form article. Not a simple library utilisation post.

curtisblaine•3mo ago

To be fair, all commercial non-browser runtimes (node, bun, deno) are "just" wrappers of V8 or JSC. Some more experimental ones are "just" wrappers of QuickJS and other less known engines.

throwawaymaths•3mo ago

iiuc its a runtime because the engine just dispatches one javascript microtask and returns to the runtime with a stack of remaining microtasks

gr4vityWall•3mo ago

Although not intuitive, it's common to call that the 'runtime' in the JS world, while V8 and JSC would be called 'JS engines'.

Deno used similar wording in a tutorial for creating your own JS runtime using Rust and V8 bindings: https://deno.com/blog/roll-your-own-javascript-runtime

IMO the tutorial is still cool nonetheless, it's a fun subject.

bryanrasmussen•3mo ago

I guess I would like to see defining your global object in a real use case and adding some functions to your global object that make sense, which admittedly once you ask someone to do the creative work of making a use case that is sensible as they start implementing it they might find it is more useful to complete the implementation of that use case rather than releasing a starter tutorial.

yb303•3mo ago

This is not "Building from scratch" This is just using.

Spivak•3mo ago

Runtime is the glue between JS Engine and OS which is from scratch. Runtime embeds engine and lets engine talk to the outside world.

throwawaymaths•3mo ago

engines only execute one JS microtask at a time, you must run it in something, that's the runtime.

lerp-io•3mo ago

unpopular comment : v8 > JavaScriptCore.

dunham•3mo ago

In general, yes, although it's nice to have more than one javascript implementation. And one advantage of JSC is that it implements tail call optimization (per the ES6 spec).

I wrote my own language that targeted javascript. When I made my language self-hosting, I initially used `bun` (based on JSC), so I wouldn't have to implement a tail call transformation myself. It was expedient.

My goal was to run in a browser, so I did eventually add that transformation and found that my compiler was 40% faster running in node (based on v8).

claytongulick•3mo ago

For those who would like a true "from scratch" implementation of JavaScript, Fabrice Bellard's QuickJS [1] is clean, readable and approachable. It's a full implementation of modern JavaScript in a straightforward project, not nearly as complex or difficult as V8.

[1] https://bellard.org/quickjs/

hackthemack•3mo ago

QuickJS is amazing. You can put in javascript code, run it through QuickJS and make little binary utilities to run on their own.

Someone took QuickJS and put it in wasm so you can run QuickJS in the browser or in node.

https://github.com/justjake/quickjs-emscripten

Fabrice Bellard is on another planet when it comes to programming. He also wrote FFmpeg and QEMU (among other things).

baudaux•3mo ago

I put QuickJS in https://exaequos.com. You can do graphics app with raylib

jhgb•3mo ago

To be fair, there's no claim being made that this was supposed to be a from-scratch implementation of Javascript. Just an equivalent to Deno/Node which don't have their own implementation of Javascript either.

ranger_danger•3mo ago

> there's no claim being made that this was supposed to be a from-scratch implementation of Javascript

That is exactly how I interpreted the title of the article.

thdhhghgbhy•3mo ago

He's abandoned it now though.

ivankra•3mo ago

Not anymore, https://github.com/bellard/quickjs

rurban•3mo ago

Finally he upped his maintainance hat. So we can archive our own github versions from the tarballs, with various patches.

djmips•3mo ago

This could useful to reference for when you want to put a JavaScript interpreter in your own custom software. For example I've seen JavaScript used for console game UI systems.

01HNNWZ0MV43FF•3mo ago

Duktape is also good for that I hear https://duktape.org/

measurablefunc•3mo ago

How about a formally verified runtime that takes the JS spec & constructs a runtime by converting the spec w/ incremental & verifiable transformations into an executable runtime?

aw1621107•3mo ago

I think you'd need a "proper" formal spec (e.g., JSCert's version of ECMAScript 5 in Coq/Rocq [0]) for that to be feasible. Not exactly sure how "verifiable" would work otherwise.

[0]: https://github.com/jscert/jscert

measurablefunc•3mo ago

They also use an unverified parser but good to know this exists.

aw1621107•3mo ago

That's true, though I think the general point stands - you need a "proper" formal spec to even begin thinking about a formally verified runtime. Presumably if you have a full formal spec a verified parser should be within reach.

WalterBright•3mo ago

I wrote a JavaScript engine from scratch using C++ back in 2000.

https://www.digitalmars.com/dscript/cppscript.html

I later translated it to D:

https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript/tree/master/engine/...

Github: https://github.com/DigitalMars/DscriptCPP

ramon156•3mo ago

The anchor links seem to be broken

Convert tempo (BPM) to millisecond durations for musical note subdivisions

Show HN: Tasty A.F.

The Contagious Taste of Cancer

U.S. Jobs Disappear at Fastest January Pace Since Great Recession

Bithumb mistakenly hands out $195M in Bitcoin to users in 'Random Box' giveaway

Beyond Agentic Coding

OpenClaw ClawHub Broken Windows Theory – If basic sorting isn't working what is?

OpenBSD Copyright Policy

OpenClaw Creator: Why 80% of Apps Will Disappear

What Happens When Technical Debt Vanishes?

AI Is Finally Eating Software's Total Market: Here's What's Next

Computer Science from the Bottom Up

Show HN: A toy compiler I built in high school (runs in browser)

You don't need Mac mini to run OpenClaw

Learning to Reason in 13 Parameters

Convergent Discovery of Critical Phenomena Mathematics Across Disciplines

Ask HN: Will GPU and RAM prices ever go down?

From hunger to luxury: The story behind the most expensive rice (2025)

Substack makes money from hosting Nazi newsletters

A New Crypto Winter Is Here and Even the Biggest Bulls Aren't Certain Why

Moltbook was peak AI theater

Why Claude Cowork is a math problem Indian IT can't solve

Show HN: Built an space travel calculator with vanilla JavaScript v2

Why a 175-Year-Old Glassmaker Is Suddenly an AI Superstar

Micro-Front Ends in 2026: Architecture Win or Enterprise Tax?

These White-Collar Workers Actually Made the Switch to a Trade

The Wonder Drug That's Plaguing Sports

Show HN: Which chef knife steels are good? Data from 540 Reddit tread

Federated Credential Management (FedCM)

Token-to-Credit Conversion: Avoiding Floating-Point Errors in AI Billing Systems