May I ask a stupid question? In order to speed up this process you'd need to buy more of the broadcom spectrometers which are quite expensive.

So instead of buying more spectrometers, is there a way to use multiple fibre cables but make them different length so the single spectrometer takes longer to process the image, but the "exposure" of all fibre cables would be at the same time. Would it be possible to stack the signal in a way that the light of the first fibre cable arrives at the spectrometre, then there is a short pause, then the light of the second fibre cable arrives at the spectrometer, etc.

I imagine it like plumbing if you have two toilets attached to the same canalisation, and you flush both toilets at the same time but the length of each toilet's pipe to the main canalization pipe is done in a way that the water of the first toilet has fully passed before the water of the second toilet arrives.

To put it into numbers: toilet1 pipe length would be 1m and toilet2 pipe length would be 10m because before both pipes join and go into the canalisation. Water travels at a certain speed in the pipe, which would make this possible.

Can the same principle be used for fibre cables? If yes, it should be possible to construct a 100x100 fibre cable sensor matrix using large fibre cable lengths but only a single spectrometer.

Edit: I did some math and it seems the second fibre cable needs to be 40.000km long so that the singal of the first fibre cable reaches the sensor after the signal of the second fibre cable has passed the sensor (at 0.2s).

  speed of light      
  in vacuum 299.792.458,00 m/s    
  in fibre 66,00 % percent    
   197.863.022,28 m/s

  exposure per pixel 0,2 s

  exposure start time   distance traveled   
  fiber 1 0 s 0   
  fiber 2  0,2 s 39.572.604,46 meters 39.572,60 kilometers

It should allow for faster scan rate (assuming the XY is the limiting factor).

"Multispectral imaging through scattering media and around corners via spectral component separation" (2024) https://opg.optica.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-32-27-48786&id... .. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42557904

"Multi-sensor characterization for an improved identification of polymers in WEEE recycling" (2024) [WEE: e-waste] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42534637 ..

"Reversible optical data storage below the diffraction limit" (2023) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42331986 :

>> [...] This is possible by multiplexing the storage in the spectral domain.

"Tongue Disease Prediction Based on Machine Learning Algorithms" (2024) https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/12/7/97 :

>> This study proposes a new imaging system to analyze and extract tongue color features at different color saturations and under different light conditions from five color space models (RGB, YcbCr, HSV, LAB, and YIQ).

"A self-healing multispectral transparent adhesive peptide glass" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07408-x :

> Moreover, the supramolecular glass is an extremely strong adhesive yet it is transparent in a wide spectral range from visible to mid-infrared. This exceptional set of characteristics is observed in a simple bioorganic peptide glass composed of natural amino acids, presenting a multi-functional material

Further study:

/? hyperspectral, specra-: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

Related applications:

Was looking into phase imaging and the four Stokes parameters S0,S1,S2,S3 and so on in assessing applications for the Parallel Axis Theorem: 2x2 "superpixel" imaging can capture the ((-45, 45), (L Circuluar, R Circular)) polarization information necessary to infer phase (and non-quantum optical entanglement is polarization)

Is polarimetric imaging (per-pixel polarization information) hyperspectral or hyperspectropolarimetrical?

spectropolarimetry: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=spectro...

Spectropolarimetry -> Polarimetry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarimetry

For example a division-of-focal-plane (DoFP) camera / image sensor has 2x2 pixels.