The original founder (Cassidy James Blaede) is now a designer for GNOME: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJq8Cq9LixE
I wonder why this is on the front page today.
It's a weird world where KDE out of the box is more usable than Windows.
I gave the wrong laptop to my mother a few months back and she only told me when she finished banking that the windows menu looked funny (Like the hacker one you put on the family computer when you were 12.) it was KDE. Usually she asks for help at least once on windows for getting the wifi connected.
The year of desktop Linux was 5 years ago and we didn't even notice.
She had an account on the wrong laptop?
Ubuntu is ok, but maybe pop!OS or something else is better for him?
I really do think that immutable distros are the future especially if you want something that don’t break. And imo KDE is arguably the best DE right now, that is if you believe DEs should follow the WinNT era UX principles.
But there is a version with GNOME too or Cosmic
Exit: OK immutable looks really interesting, thank you.
There are rolling immutable/atomic distros but Kinoute is not one.
Immutable is indeed the future. The moment a user installs something on a traditional mutable OS, it's configuration/environment drifts from the "base", making any system update or application install a potential conflict. After you install something on a traditional mutable OS, there's often no way to get back to the base without a OS reinstall (programs don't clean up after themselves, they change system settings, environment, more/worse).
Immutable operating systems solve this by having an immutable base image. Everyone running, for instance, Kinoite 42.20251011.0 all have exactly the same base. Users then can "layer" applications on top of the base image, sort of like a dockerfile. If something breaks, you just remove that application (layer) and it's like it never happened. Everyone having the same exact base image also means updates can be much more thoroughly tested, and confidently rolled-out to users.
Note, "Immutable" doesn't mean you can't save files or install things - it just means you cannot mutate the base OS image. There's always a "known good configuration" to go back to.
You're also encouraged to use "pet" containers for things like development - where you will install all sorts of weird system packages, libraries, tools, etc. without fear of polluting or breaking your system.
An immutable system + pet containers means your system will always be stable. Really neat.
I can certainly see how containerizing apps and using "layered" FS solves a class of problems, but I highly doubt this alone would be incentive enough for the major OSes to go that way. I do agree it would be neat to see such developments, though.
If so, then Manjaro.
If not, I always say:
From Windows? > Mint.
From MacOS? > Ubuntu.
The answer is almost always one of those two for non-technical people.
What's wrong with rolling release?
Another person mentioned Ubuntu if coming from Mac. I haven’t considered it before but they’re probably right.
I was using Mac at home, but Windows at work. So moving to Mint was easy.
Ubuntu was OK on high performance hardware but when they introduced snaps nothing worked so I moved to Mint.
HTH
BTW, what makes you look for rolling-release distro specifically?
Ubuntu and pop are not rolling release. Neither is Fedora.
Asking since none of the examples you were considering are actually rolling, it wasn't clear what you're after.
Who is "we?" How is that team selected? Are their decisions public? What is the review or appeal process like?
We manage AppCenter reviews as pull requests to a public git repository: https://github.com/elementary/appcenter-reviews
There’s some more documentation for developers here: https://docs.elementary.io/develop/appcenter/publishing-requ...
This version seems to have flaws I didn’t see in the old announcements. Spacing and padding are a bit inconsistent and sometimes a bit strange. Font sizing can be weird and alignment is hit and miss especially when icons and text are involved.
Clearly these are details but I’m wondering if they lost man power on these points. I still greatly appreciate the project ambition and am impressed by what they have managed to achieve.
I eventually fell out of love with elementaryOS when the team seemed to double down hard on some unpopular design decisions wrt window control buttons/behaviour, for instance.
I always felt that they had taken on more than they could chew, and all the good will of their community wasn't going to change that fact. To this day I maintain that the project should have just been Pantheon, the Desktop Environment. The team seems to have strong opinions about UX, and that's where most of that matters.
I'm not the only one who thought of that, and the team's justifications for their decision to roll their own distro never came across as strong.
I've since moved on (to macOS and Ubuntu one the side), but once in a while I browse the official sub for the latest. I've never shaken off that feeling that the really talented founders could have spent their energy more wisely.
The main webpage makes no further declaration around it for deeper understanding. Nothing in support pages or in developer resources. Anyone else familiar with the project that could describe why that needed to be called out?
https://web.archive.org/web/20210902014243/https://elementar...
https://mastodon.social/@danirabbit@mastodon.online/11535606...
Checkmate, Linux users
I remember Elementary being big on UX, design, creating a universal app store for Linux, and providing a sane default type of experience. Pretty much all of that fizzled out over the past 5 years. GNOME and Plasma both leapfrogged Pantheon as a DE. Ubuntu, Debian, Mint, and Fedora are all far easier recommends over Elementary.
Elementary OS 7 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34598987 - Jan 2023 (92 comments)
Elementary OS 6.1 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29627193 - Dec 2021 (142 comments)
Elementary OS 6 Odin - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28130560 - Aug 2021 (319 comments)
Elementary OS 6 beta - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27001736 - May 2021 (69 comments)
Cheers to 10 Years - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26658317 - April 2021 (77 comments)
Elementary OS 5.1 Hera - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21719028 - Dec 2019 (190 comments)
Elementary OS – Fast, open, privacy-respecting replacement for Windows and macOS - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18472018 - Nov 2018 (421 comments)
Elementary OS 5 Juno Is Here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18236240 - Oct 2018 (15 comments)
Switching from macOS: Developer Environment - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12877045 - Nov 2016 (172 comments)
Switching from macOS: The Basics - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12853531 - Nov 2016 (593 comments)
Elementary OS - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12830761 - Oct 2016 (386 comments)
Elementary OS Loki 0.4 Stable Release - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12465763 - Sept 2016 (63 comments)
Elementary OS Freya Released - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9361477 - April 2015 (87 comments)
Elementary OS 0.3 “Freya” is released - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9359722 - April 2015 (62 comments)
Elementary OS Freya Beta 2 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9049592 - Feb 2015 (43 comments)
Myths about ElementaryOS - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7864397 - June 2014 (53 comments)
ElementaryOs Luna released - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6193148 - Aug 2013 (296 comments)
Elementary OS - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2781891 - July 2011 (79 comments)
Elementary OS - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2091736 - Jan 2011 (15 comments)
Even the list of applications on AppCenter is woefully limited, compared to using Flatpack and being able to access the full repertoire of Linux Desktop applications.
rckt•1h ago
But maybe this changed.