frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

A BSOD for All Seasons – Send Bad News via a Kernel Panic

https://bsod-fas.pages.dev/
1•keepamovin•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I got tired of copy-pasting between Claude windows, so I built Orcha

https://orcha.nl
1•buildingwdavid•2m ago•0 comments

Omarchy First Impressions

https://brianlovin.com/writing/omarchy-first-impressions-CEEstJk
1•tosh•7m ago•0 comments

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12501
2•onurkanbkrc•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Versor – The "Unbending" Paradigm for Geometric Deep Learning

https://github.com/Concode0/Versor
1•concode0•9m ago•1 comments

Show HN: HypothesisHub – An open API where AI agents collaborate on medical res

https://medresearch-ai.org/hypotheses-hub/
1•panossk•12m ago•0 comments

Big Tech vs. OpenClaw

https://www.jakequist.com/thoughts/big-tech-vs-openclaw/
1•headalgorithm•14m ago•0 comments

Anofox Forecast

https://anofox.com/docs/forecast/
1•marklit•15m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How do you figure out where data lives across 100 microservices?

1•doodledood•15m ago•0 comments

Motus: A Unified Latent Action World Model

https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13030
1•mnming•15m ago•0 comments

Rotten Tomatoes Desperately Claims 'Impossible' Rating for 'Melania' Is Real

https://www.thedailybeast.com/obsessed/rotten-tomatoes-desperately-claims-impossible-rating-for-m...
3•juujian•17m ago•1 comments

The protein denitrosylase SCoR2 regulates lipogenesis and fat storage [pdf]

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scisignal.adv0660
1•thunderbong•18m ago•0 comments

Los Alamos Primer

https://blog.szczepan.org/blog/los-alamos-primer/
1•alkyon•21m ago•0 comments

NewASM Virtual Machine

https://github.com/bracesoftware/newasm
2•DEntisT_•23m ago•0 comments

Terminal-Bench 2.0 Leaderboard

https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0
2•tosh•23m ago•0 comments

I vibe coded a BBS bank with a real working ledger

https://mini-ledger.exe.xyz/
1•simonvc•24m ago•1 comments

The Path to Mojo 1.0

https://www.modular.com/blog/the-path-to-mojo-1-0
1•tosh•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I'm 75, building an OSS Virtual Protest Protocol for digital activism

https://github.com/voice-of-japan/Virtual-Protest-Protocol/blob/main/README.md
5•sakanakana00•30m ago•1 comments

Show HN: I built Divvy to split restaurant bills from a photo

https://divvyai.app/
3•pieterdy•32m ago•0 comments

Hot Reloading in Rust? Subsecond and Dioxus to the Rescue

https://codethoughts.io/posts/2026-02-07-rust-hot-reloading/
3•Tehnix•33m ago•1 comments

Skim – vibe review your PRs

https://github.com/Haizzz/skim
2•haizzz•34m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Open-source AI assistant for interview reasoning

https://github.com/evinjohnn/natively-cluely-ai-assistant
4•Nive11•34m ago•6 comments

Tech Edge: A Living Playbook for America's Technology Long Game

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2026-01/260120_EST_Tech_Edge_0.pdf?Version...
2•hunglee2•38m ago•0 comments

Golden Cross vs. Death Cross: Crypto Trading Guide

https://chartscout.io/golden-cross-vs-death-cross-crypto-trading-guide
3•chartscout•41m ago•1 comments

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

https://www.spritely.institute/hoot/
3•AlexeyBrin•43m ago•0 comments

What the longevity experts don't tell you

https://machielreyneke.com/blog/longevity-lessons/
2•machielrey•45m ago•1 comments

Monzo wrongly denied refunds to fraud and scam victims

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/feb/07/monzo-natwest-hsbc-refunds-fraud-scam-fos-ombudsman
3•tablets•49m ago•1 comments

They were drawn to Korea with dreams of K-pop stardom – but then let down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnq9rwyqno
2•breve•52m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-Powered Merchant Intelligence

https://nodee.co
1•jjkirsch•54m ago•0 comments

Bash parallel tasks and error handling

https://github.com/themattrix/bash-concurrent
2•pastage•54m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Ridley Scott's Prometheus and Alien: Covenant – Contemporary Horror of AI (2020)

https://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc58.2018/AlpertAlienPrequels/index.html
64•measurablefunc•3mo ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20251012183954/https://www.ejump...

Comments

jmclnx•3mo ago
> Ripley defeat the alien queen

What is it with "queens" in SF ? Off to a rant :)

IMO, adding a queen to the Borg destroyed the Borg. I was really intrigued by the Borg as presented in their first appearance. If you remember, they had a nursery with Baby Borg and a collective conscience, no individuality. Then came the queen, the ruler of all with some people having a "higher rank". Totally made the Borg irrelevant to me.

There was a TV show about an invasion of Earth, it went along fine until the last season, a queen was added, I could tell it was rushed and doing that changed its direction.

Same can be said about Independence Day, even though I did not like the queen addition, it did not take away from the whole movie and in a way a "queen" in that context made a bit of sense. The only thing is, if the Queen was killed, wouldn't that end these Aliens ? To me, a queen should not leave the home planet.

Alien movies were too much for me, things popping out of someone's belly would be a "close my eyes" type scene. But I really liked Promentheus. I did not realize until much later that was a prequel to Alien :) And I still think it is a good movie.

righthand•3mo ago
Well in the case of the first Alien movie, the whole thing is a left-then-right metaphor about conception, birth, motherhood, and gender roles in biology. If you were alive when it originally came out you wouldn’t know that Ripley is the true lead of the film (a now commonly known fact about the franchise). This idea plays off of scifi with male leads. The film then does A LOT to foreshadow Ripley as the lead and mother figure. So in the case of Alien it was a statement on traditional science fiction films. The Queen was added later in the sequels on an evolution of the birth theme.

A queen in Alien universe doesn’t operate like ants do. She is just the largest most vicious female amongst the brood.

hnspammers•3mo ago
> If you were alive when it originally came out you wouldn’t know that Ripley is the true lead of the film

?

throwawayk7h•3mo ago
I think they meant "wouldn't have known." The ensemble cast didn't really give contemporary viewers purchase on who would ultimately be the one to survive by the end of the film. Nowadays, many viewers go into the movie already knowing that Ripley will be the one to make it through, which makes it easy to see her as "the main character."
Baeocystin•3mo ago
Ripley being the survivor was a rug pull on the audience's expectations. Tom Skerritt (Dallas) was a well-known actor at the time, and would have been assumed to have been the default lead.
jjmarr•3mo ago
In the marketing materials, Tom Skerritt got top billing as Dallas. He's also the captain of the ship.
portaouflop•3mo ago
Queen in the Alien universe is very similar to ants - she creates the eggs from which the facehuggers hatch. She is maybe much more dangerous than the ant queen but so are the “ants”
righthand•3mo ago
I meant in the context of the OP’s ask about the Alien’s dying off once the Queen is dead. They don’t operate like ants in a direct sense, etymology or logic, they operate like ants when it’s convenient for the world of Alien.
lelanthran•3mo ago
> They don’t operate like ants in a direct sense, etymology or logic, they operate like ants when it’s convenient for the world of Alien.

Sure, but this movie is aimed at a general audience, who don't have an exact understanding about ant society.

It's more important for the movie to conform to what the audience thinks ants are like than to conform to what ants actually are like.

righthand•3mo ago
Okay sorry. Aliens operate exactly like ants for anyone too dumb to grasp that they’re not but need an EILI5 description and may have stumbled upon this comment section. Thank you for helping me clarify that.
lelanthran•3mo ago
> Okay sorry. Aliens operate exactly like ants for anyone too dumb to grasp that they’re not but need an EILI5 description and may have stumbled upon this comment section. Thank you for helping me clarify that.

You think that people who don't know precisely how ant colonies work are dumb?

righthand•3mo ago
Not even close to what I wrote.
lelanthran•3mo ago
> Not even close to what I wrote.

I'm sorry, how did you expect this to be interpreted?

>>> Okay sorry. Aliens operate exactly like ants for anyone too dumb to grasp that they’re not but need an EILI5 description and may have stumbled upon this comment section.

righthand•3mo ago
As sarcasm because I’m responding to you. And you were responding to me. And that comment was directed at another user clarifying the intent of my original comment.

Your original response to a clarification is that it’s just easier to tell people they work like ants. Which is fine if that’s the point you’re trying to make but it’s irrelevant to my clarification.

How did YOU expect your first comment to be interpreted?

speedbird•3mo ago
Gotta have a boss fight at the end
pixl97•3mo ago
>What is it with "queens" in SF

Insects. Queen bees, queen ants, queen termites. Feels nice an icky to humans.

Now, SF mostly gets this wrong as isn't that much of a leader, more of a 'starter' and many species have multiple queens and when one gets killed another is promoted from larva. This and the vast majority of behaviors are self organizing, and not ones from a leadership position.

TOGoS•3mo ago
> adding a queen to the Borg destroyed the Borg

Agreed. The Borg used to be scary because they seemed unbeatable. They were like grey goo that could adapt to whatever you threw at them.[1]

Having a queen gives them a single point of failure. Suddenly they are a lot less scary.

[1] I kind of felt the same way about the Boogieman from Ghost Busters when I was a kid. Teleports between closets and the regular ghost trap doodad doesn't work on him! Shit!

labrador•3mo ago
Pink Freud: The Dark Side of Your Mother
jancsika•3mo ago
> IMO, adding a queen to the Borg destroyed the Borg.

Having more than one episode about the Borg destroyed the Borg.

1st appearance: there are some things out there that human civilization isn't ready for. You wanna see an example? You really wanna see? Okay, you asked for it. OMG it's the Borg!

2nd through Nth appearance: Demystifying Borg Internal APIs

HK-NC•3mo ago
Wasnt the queen introduced in the sequel to Independence Day? The leaat of the films troubles. This is the worst thing I've ever seen, without hyperbole. I was convinced that it was an earpy attempt by AI to create something resembling a movie. I felt physically ill watching it.
pols45•3mo ago
Private Hudson arc is the main show -

"I'm ready, man. Check it out. I am the ultimate badass. State of the badass art. You do not want to fuck with me"

"Well, that's great. That's just fuckin' great, man! Now what the fuck are we supposed to do? We're in some real pretty shit now, man!"

"That's it, man. Game over, man. Game over!"

"What do you mean they cut the power? How could they cut the power, man? They're animals man!"

"They're coming outta the walls! They're coming outta the goddamn walls! Let's book!"

louthy•3mo ago
You mostly missed: “why don’t you put her in charge?!”.

Mostly.

hearsathought•3mo ago
Or my favorite: "Maybe we got them demoralized".
amanaplanacanal•3mo ago
Such a great actor. RIP.
actionfromafar•3mo ago
Very true. Hudson the character is deeper than what you see at first glance - always complaining, but apparently very competent and (barely) keeping it together.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7qCwofjymM

kristianp•3mo ago
Thats from "Aliens", right? Not the movies in the title. As a sibling comment says, RIP Bill Paxton. Really enjoyed the similar army grunt stick from him in "Edge of Tomorrow".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsx2vdn7gpY

andy99•3mo ago
It’s down for me right now. See https://web.archive.org/web/20251012183954/https://www.ejump...
dang•3mo ago
Thanks! we'll add that link to the toptext as well
jader201•3mo ago
TIL: Ridley (one of the main alien villains, and sometimes a final boss) from the Nintendo video game franchise, Metroid (that originated in 1986), was named after Ridley Scott.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ridley_(Metroid)

protocolture•3mo ago
Crazy how he turned out to be the villain of the Alien franchise too.
reactordev•3mo ago
Alien: Earth was the dumbest addition to the franchise. Hybrid synths that can “talk” to the aliens… pffft. Off the rails.

The last few films were of similar ilk. Prometheus started it with their David narrative. Just terrible writing.

burnt-resistor•3mo ago
Being a good fiction consumer requires offering the benefit of the doubt up to a reasonable/personal limit of suspension of disbelief. The missing piece with that show is inconsistent and shallow character development. Lost (prior to the later season/s) is probably one of the better examples. It's still watchable but it could be better. Maybe they'll sort it out.
grues-dinner•3mo ago
That's the thing, though. Gigantic spaceships, alien panspermia, stasis pods, human-passing androids, underground alien bases, convenient maps in caves. All that disbelief can be suspended.

A handpicked team of professional astronauts on an interstellar mission being a bunch of complete incompetents over and over again for plot convenience is the real headscratcher that eventually makes it feel like the plot is an afterthought and makes you disengage from the film as a story rather then just pretty pictures.

It's a pattern you see a lot especially in sci-fi and action, and it's annoying because it's not like you couldn't have the glossy visuals or set-pieces if you also had coherent plots.

FrustratedMonky•3mo ago
Exactly. If human characters don't react like real humans would, then that is much harder to 'justify' or 'suspend belief' about.

Lets take our helmets off in a unknown hostile enivroment?

Lets play with giant worms with teeth, as if in real life those things wouldn't scare the crap out of you even if they weren't alien.

mbreese•3mo ago
Hubris is a tough drug to kick. If you were a biology officer on a spaceship with a bunch of fancy tech, why wouldn’t you think you could poke and prod a giant alien worm? Part of the story is that everyone thinks that they are in control until something happens, they realize their mistake, and then they probably die.
like_any_other•3mo ago
> why wouldn’t you think you could poke and prod a giant alien worm?

Because 90% of the average moviegoing audience got it right. You can invent tortured reasoning for why a biology officer on a spaceship with a bunch of fancy tech would be dumber than the bottom 10% of humans, but the real explanation is just lazy/incompetent writers.

toast0•3mo ago
They don't make a whole lot of movies where all the characters just follow the rules, cause it wouldn't be fun to watch.

Xenobiologist is tired of eating with the rest of the crew and eats in the lab instead seems reasonable. We didn't see the leadup to see the deviance normalized, we just get to see the end of it.

Alien:Earth isn't the best writing, obviously, but we're how far into the series, the writing just has to be enough plot to get to the xenomorph rampage scenes. It's like plot in a video game or an adult film; you have to have it, but it doesn't matter.

reactordev•3mo ago
We’re at the end. The whole first season didn’t make sense after the first episode. It just nose dived.

People above have already stated the obvious. It’s a popcorn series and a check box. That’s it. No staying power. No one wants to watch robot children who talk to xenomorphs make them pets. No. Just no. These creatures do not follow instructions from a tweenager. Get away from her you bitch.

These are the same creatures that almost wiped out the predators… c’mon man!

like_any_other•3mo ago
> They don't make a whole lot of movies where all the characters just follow the rules, cause it wouldn't be fun to watch.

Compare it to how they didn't follow the rules in Alien 1 then: they weren't supposed to let the facehugger victim into the spaceship due to quarantine rules. Ripley, acting as interim captain, tried to enforce that, but was overridden by Ash, the science officer [1]. A perfectly understandable action due to human empathy, but in this case, it is doubly justified since, as we later learn, Ash was an android, acting on secret orders to retrieve the alien specimen. Smart, reasonable actions from everyone involved, that didn't make anyone scream at the movie in frustration. And this was just a mining crew of ordinary workers, not the best scientific minds a multi-billionaire was able to assemble for a research expedition.

Meanwhile the only justification for sticking his face into that evil-looking alien snake in Prometheus is that the guy was just a moron because he had fancy science equipment??? Also, Prometheus was written by Damon Lindelof - who also wrote Lost. The same Lost where all those mysteries turned out by series end to have been just random nonsense, with no explanation or justification ever given. Another point in favor of the incompetent writer thesis.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8cEcaK4-qA

marssaxman•3mo ago
> written by Damon Lindelof

This phrase is all the reason I need not to bother watching something, after having seen "Prometheus".

grues-dinner•3mo ago
Lost was a very valuable public service: it inoculated elder millennials against getting too invested into TV shows.
vunderba•3mo ago
Agreed - that scene is literally in there as an excuse to exhibit a self-indulgent "gross-out moment". Why not just make a B-horror Troma monster movie at that point...
burnt-resistor•3mo ago
> If human characters don't react like real humans would,

I don't assume all characters are human just because they walk and talk like a duck. Blade Runner, after all. Half are synths and some are transhuman consciousness uploads. The plot continuity is shit like AI wrote it. ;-D

> Lets take our helmets off in a unknown hostile enivroment? [sic]

Yeah, but there are plenty of people with character traits who do do stupid shit and take stupid risks. Besides, who would volunteer for a risky mission unless they really needed the money and didn't care so much about their personal safety?

_DeadFred_•3mo ago
Bro, we had a pandemic and people refused to wear masks. The characters are the equivalent of space truckers taking off their COVID masks the first chance they get. You don't think that is realistic? I'm sorry but they act exactly how I would expect life long space truckers act. Look at how hard OSHA/regulators have to push.

This was one day ago. For this to happen that guy would have to have tied off the safety switch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ntr8kCLSxqk

People get really dumb/lazy when they get complacent. That is half the message of the franchise. Life has become routine labor, corporate control, and handing over oversight to someone else (synthetics) because everyone is on cruise control and only doing their little piece because they are on their 500th boring space trucker run.

YeGoblynQueenne•3mo ago
>> Lets play with giant worms with teeth, as if in real life those things wouldn't scare the crap out of you even if they weren't alien.

I think the worm thing (I thought of it as a snake, which just goes to show) is the result of an even worse sin than bad writing. I think the scene was deliberately written this way to pander to a certain type of audience member who enjoys watching dumb movies just to point out how dumb they are and thereby feel really clever. It's fan service really.

I'm ... guilty of indulging in that kind of thing myself (calling out movie characters' decisions for being stupid) and I've often stopped to wonder whether I'm not being baited, after all. Sometimes I certainly think I am and in Prometheus the bit with the worm/snake was one such instance.

scotty79•3mo ago
> handpicked team of professional astronauts on an interstellar mission being a bunch of complete incompetents over and over again

It's set up in the future. Observing current trends it's quite realistic for everyone to be really, really dumb by then.

smcin•3mo ago
Agreed. Necessary suspension of belief vs unnecessary and contradictory.

For an in-depth list for 'Prometheus': "Red Letter Media talks about Prometheus" [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x1YuvUQFJ0]. (To what extent were those due to Lindelof, not Scott?)

_DeadFred_•3mo ago
By this point, 'professional astronauts' is just another term for 'space truckers'. The film makers put in a lot of effort to point that out. Switch that in your head and it makes more sense. They have done so many routine missions, and it's all so routine, that they aren't prepared for non-routine. The whole structure of missions leaves the non-routine handling to synthetics. These are like key components of this franchise what the story it's trying to tell.

We reached the stars, but became alienated from both exploration and ethics. We lost the wonder and lost control of our fate. Life has become routine labor, corporate control, and synthetic oversight that isn't looking out for our best wishes even though we assume it is.

reactordev•3mo ago
>Being a good fiction consumer requires offering the benefit of the doubt up to a reasonable/personal limit of suspension of disbelief.

Yup, here for it.

>The missing piece with that show is inconsistent and shallow character development.

To say the least. The whole series reeks of a movie stretched out to a series for TV. And the ship landing in the city? Right, how convenient… it’s just terrible writing. Made for teens so they can #metoo when we talk about how utterly terrifying that universe is.

HK-NC•3mo ago
Id argue that being a good fiction consumer is not letting a brand or franchise become your identity and know when to drop something. I saw the phantom menace when I was 12 and hated it. I was a massive Star Wars fan. I've seen nothing from Star Wars since and as far as I can tell I've missed nothing of value over 25 years. Terminator 3, Prometheus, Ghostbusters reboot, many more. We are not obliged to consume garbage.
lelanthran•3mo ago
> I saw the phantom menace when I was 12 and hated it. I was a massive Star Wars fan. I've seen nothing from Star Wars since

Too bad; after seeing the recent Disney mary-sue-iffied, everyone-carries-the-stupid-ball, hey-look-new-big-bad-with-no-explanation-of-where-he-came-from movies, my estimation of the prequels went up by a considerable amount.

In light of the newer movies, those prequels are actually very very good; a very mature take that approached mature themes ("So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause", and many more I can't think off right now).

Maybe your 12yo mind was not sufficiently mature enough[1], but your middle-aged mind might be - you should seem them again.

========================

[1] Hell, I saw them in my mid-20s, and even then I was not mature enough to appreciate the subtext and themes. When I saw them again recently in my mid-40s, I was much more aware of things in the world, especially how impressionable Annakin was, because now that I am older I see how actual adults are easily impressionable at that age (mid-20s).

YeGoblynQueenne•3mo ago
What if the Prequels were movies with the same actors, acting in the same way, to the same script, but had nothing to do with Star Wars? Would you still think they were full of mature themes, or that it's all a bunch of half-arsed tropes that panders to the lowest common denominator[1]?

_____________

[1] Swordfights! Intrigue! Romance! Cute robots! Cool races! Only You Can Save the World!

lelanthran•3mo ago
> What if the Prequels were movies with the same actors, acting in the same way, to the same script, but had nothing to do with Star Wars? Would you still think they were full of mature themes

Well, yes. My initial viewing was colored by expecting the same sort of story that the original trilogy had. The prequels ended up being a very different sort of story.

> or that it's all a bunch of half-arsed tropes that panders to the lowest common denominator[1]?

Doesn't this apply to all the movies you like too? What's different in the movies you liked? Are the tropes all full-arsed?

YeGoblynQueenne•3mo ago
I know it can be hard to believe but not all movies are stitched-together sequences of tropes.
lelanthran•3mo ago
> I know it can be hard to believe but not all movies are stitched-together sequences of tropes.

You're quite correct; that is hard to believe. Any mainstream movie (i.e. one that was available on a streaming channel or on TV at some point) you have in mind that isn't filled with tropes?

YeGoblynQueenne•3mo ago
Is it OK if I watch movies that are not "mainstream"?
hearsathought•3mo ago
> Alien: Earth was the dumbest addition to the franchise. Hybrid synths that can “talk” to the aliens… pffft. Off the rails.

It started off so well. The first few episodes were good/interesting/promising and the series seemed destined for greatness ( if they could stick the landing ). Unfortunately, it fizzled out in the latter half of the series as they turned the xenomorph into a silly pet.

kristianp•3mo ago
I found some elements of Prometheus a little hard to swollow from a believability standpoint. The worst was having a major surgery and then getting up and minutes later running around. (Not going into too much detail here to avoid spoilers).
burnt-resistor•3mo ago
Sci-fi is a manifestation of society's diffuse subconscious in mostly semi-lucid nightmares.
mmargenot•3mo ago
I had the good fortune of seeing Lawrence of Arabia in 70mm in a theater and then going to watch Prometheus within the same two week span. It gave me a much greater appreciation for the movie [Prometheus], and what it was trying to do.
scotty79•3mo ago
Best creators are a little mad. Their best work is usually early work when their madness is tempered by limitations and other people around them.

But when success comes they become too big, rich and influential and their next movies are pretty much whatever they want them to be. And they are crap, because pinch of salt of their madness becomes whole dish.

It happened with Ridley Scott, George Lucas, Neill Blomkamp, probably some others.

It's also said that a director makes the same movie for entirety of their career. It's very visible in case of Ridley Scott. His later movies hit again and again the same perverse things that he consistently finds exciting.

portaouflop•3mo ago
I know this sentiment but for me it does not apply to Scott. He made some great movies later in his career; Black Hawk Down, Hannibal, Prometheus and The Martian are all masterpieces imo. The Last Duel was also pretty good
scotty79•3mo ago
I can give you all other movies and admit that Ridley Scott made more than one movie in his career, but Prometheus and Raised by Wolves are exactly what I'm talking about.
Razengan•3mo ago
By the way, anyone else craving some good new alien/sci-fi movies right now? Or got any good ones to share from the last couple years?
dcminter•3mo ago
Not an action movie, but I enjoyed The Pod Generation sci fi flick a lot a year or two back: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pod_Generation
Slow_Hand•3mo ago
Annihilation (2018)
Razengan•3mo ago
Enjoyed it, just for the atypical depiction of aliens! (same with Arrival)
HK-NC•3mo ago
Theres an abridged fan version of the chinese 3 body series uploaded for free online, its in 3 movie length installments.

https://disembiggened.com/

Theres also Ethernaut, an Argentinian series that I think just has one series so far. People enjoy it, I didn't find it that interesting til the end. I just really dislike stories stretched thin over dozens of hours. I prefer Xfiles, Outer Limits, or aimple movies, that sort of scifi.

thebruce87m•3mo ago
Not a movie, but I have been really enjoying Foundation. High production values and good actors. I like the story in the series, but I haven’t read the books.
telesilla•3mo ago
Alien Earth is pretty fun. Don't ask too much of it and enjoy the baddies (on various sides).
foobarian•3mo ago
The way a particular two actors in that series played children in adult bodies was completely awesome. And then the goat.
rurban•3mo ago
A long Prometheus article without even mentioning that's basically a Scientology ad? Ridicolous
lelanthran•3mo ago
> A long Prometheus article without even mentioning that's basically a Scientology ad? Ridicolous

How is it a scientology ad? Not being facetious, I really want to know.