The logic seems to be: AI was used to make this, so it's automatically garbage. This is also true for code by the way.
Not gonna lie, I also found myself doing this sort of discrimination in my head.
The problem is the following: this is a bias. Just because AI was used to make something, that something is not automatically invalid.
I understand where the bias comes from, a lot of this AI generated content is extremely lazy and boring. But that's not a valid arguments to disregard something just because our AI radar is triggered. A lot of people, me included, uses AI to correct grammar and improve syntax. And why wouldn't we?
I think avoiding this bias is important because focusing on style instead of content is exactly what we shouldn't be doing in this time and age. We should pay even more attention to the actual meaning of what is written since AI can be very persuasive at making faulty arguments and forging facts.
Em dashes are not a valid reason to shut off your critical thinking.
bell-cot•1h ago
Limiting even my scantest attention (let alone critical thinking) via extremely simplistic - but fast - criteria is an inescapable physical reality.