Built a free tool for professionals who use AI for drafting but need human-quality output for their final work.
RealiWrite takes AI-generated text and refines it with:
- Readability control (Simple/Standard/Advanced)
- Tone selection (General/Academic/Professional/SEO)
- Fine-tuning sliders for creativity, sentence variation, and word choice
- "Human-Writer" score to measure naturalness
The problem I kept seeing: teams use ChatGPT or other AI tools for first drafts, but the output is too robotic for client-facing work. You can't just copy-paste it into a proposal or report. Someone has to spend time rewriting it to sound professional.
This automates that process. Pick "Professional" tone, adjust readability to your audience, and get output that sounds like a skilled writer produced it.
Real-world use cases:
- Business reports and proposals that need to sound polished
- Marketing copy for emails and landing pages
- Technical documentation that needs to be clear and engaging
- Academic writing that maintains proper tone
- SEO content that ranks well and reads naturally
The "Human-Writer" score gives objective feedback. High scores (90+) mean it passes as human writing; lower scores mean you might need to adjust settings and try again.
Made it free because I think good writing tools should be accessible. The fine-tune controls are there for users who want more precision.
I know there are ethical questions here, especially around academic use. My perspective: AI assistance is already ubiquitous. This tool helps ensure the final output is quality work, not obviously machine-generated garbage.
Would love feedback from others using AI in professional workflows. How do you handle the "robotic AI output" problem?
```
drbacem•3mo ago
RealiWrite takes AI-generated text and refines it with: - Readability control (Simple/Standard/Advanced) - Tone selection (General/Academic/Professional/SEO) - Fine-tuning sliders for creativity, sentence variation, and word choice - "Human-Writer" score to measure naturalness
The problem I kept seeing: teams use ChatGPT or other AI tools for first drafts, but the output is too robotic for client-facing work. You can't just copy-paste it into a proposal or report. Someone has to spend time rewriting it to sound professional.
This automates that process. Pick "Professional" tone, adjust readability to your audience, and get output that sounds like a skilled writer produced it.
Real-world use cases: - Business reports and proposals that need to sound polished - Marketing copy for emails and landing pages - Technical documentation that needs to be clear and engaging - Academic writing that maintains proper tone - SEO content that ranks well and reads naturally
The "Human-Writer" score gives objective feedback. High scores (90+) mean it passes as human writing; lower scores mean you might need to adjust settings and try again.
Made it free because I think good writing tools should be accessible. The fine-tune controls are there for users who want more precision.
I know there are ethical questions here, especially around academic use. My perspective: AI assistance is already ubiquitous. This tool helps ensure the final output is quality work, not obviously machine-generated garbage.
Would love feedback from others using AI in professional workflows. How do you handle the "robotic AI output" problem? ```