My anecdata is that GSuite works completely fine daily driving Firefox.
Anyway...
>We believe the proposed interoperable Attribution standard has the potential to support this objective in a privacy-preserving fashion, and we'll continue to engage on it through the web standards process in collaboration with a wide range of stakeholders including other browser makers.
>After evaluating ecosystem feedback about their expected value and in light of their low levels of adoption, we've decided to retire the following Privacy Sandbox technologies: Attribution Reporting API (Chrome and Android), IP Protection, On-Device Personalization, Private Aggregation (including Shared Storage), Protected Audience (Chrome and Android), Protected App Signals, Related Website Sets (including requestStorageAccessFor and Related Website Partition), SelectURL, SDK Runtime and Topics (Chrome and Android).
Update on Plans for Privacy Sandbox Technologies
https://privacysandbox.com/news/update-on-plans-for-privacy-...
jauntywundrkind•1h ago
If the commentariat hadn't been so persistently snipey about Google throughout (assuming only worst faiths), maybe the broader advertising industry might not have achieved the obstructionist regulatory capture that really slammed on the brakes for doing anything different and maybe perhaps possibly better.
Instead we all get tracked forever.
BizarroLand•57m ago
I don't care if Google was trying to do something good. Good things accomplished through evil means are evil.
After all, it isn't as if Google isn't already tracking us itself, selling the data it has gleaned from us to advertisers, and then helping the advertisers specifically target us based on its insane amount of data on each of us.
So whinging about how one thing that might have been a little better died due to their evil overlords's middle managers mismanaging it is a waste of energy.
Scoundreller•32m ago
Yeah, I’m migrating away from Chrome over that.
3-cheese-sundae•56m ago