frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Working as a cook when it went to No 1–how Norman Greenbaum made SpiritInTheSky

https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2025/oct/20/norman-greenbaum-spirit-in-the-sky-cook-no-1-jesus
1•bookofjoe•52s ago•0 comments

Show HN: First platform in the world to rank robots

https://botrank.io/
1•tbabenko•2m ago•0 comments

UpOnly Podcast to Return through 25M NFT Sale

https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/1980397986149744769
1•felixbraun•12m ago•0 comments

Better-Sqlite3 vs. Sqlite3

https://github.com/WiseLibs/better-sqlite3/issues/262
1•steveharrison•22m ago•0 comments

Protocol Check-In (Fall 2025)

https://docs.bsky.app/blog/protocol-checkin-fall-2025
1•steveklabnik•25m ago•0 comments

Do animals fall for optical illusions? It's complicated

https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/10/do-animals-fall-for-optical-illusions-its-complicated/
1•jnord•25m ago•0 comments

Biggest Skate Ramp EVER (world record)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqflfjrcKjo
1•doener•26m ago•0 comments

My Last Day as an Accomplice of the Republican Party

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/my-last-day-as-an-accomplice-of-the-republican-party-miles-bruner
7•colonCapitalDee•30m ago•1 comments

Google's new AI scheduler optimizes resource usage in large cloud data centers

https://research.google/blog/solving-virtual-machine-puzzles-how-ai-is-optimizing-cloud-computing/
2•rochoa•33m ago•0 comments

You don't need Kafka: Building a message queue with Unix signals

https://leandronsp.com/articles/you-dont-need-kafka-building-a-message-queue-with-only-two-unix-s...
2•SchwKatze•34m ago•0 comments

Eavesdropping on Internal Networks via Unencrypted Satellites

https://satcom.sysnet.ucsd.edu/
2•Bogdanp•35m ago•0 comments

Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Inhibitory Control of Thought (Preprint)

https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/4wcnb_v1
3•marshfram•37m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Online Sourcerer – The best answer to 'source?'

https://www.onlinesourcerer.org/
4•altugnet•41m ago•0 comments

Transformative AI Notes

https://tecunningham.github.io/posts/2025-09-19-transformative-AI-notes.html
1•cjbarber•43m ago•0 comments

My Issues with AI in the Creative Process – James Gurney (Dinotopia)

https://jamesgurney.substack.com/p/my-issues-with-ai-in-the-creative
2•Balgair•48m ago•0 comments

Clang Bytecode Interpreter Update

https://developers.redhat.com/articles/2025/10/15/clang-bytecode-interpreter-update
1•matt_d•52m ago•0 comments

Exploring IRC (Internet Relay Chat)

https://blog.preahs.com/exploring-irc-internet-relay-chat/
3•8organicbits•53m ago•1 comments

Study finds large fluctuations in occupied sea level throughout the last Ice Age

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1102097
2•marshfram•54m ago•0 comments

National Guard deployment in San Francisco loom over city's AI-driven resurgence

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/20/trump-calls-for-national-guard-deployment-loom-over-sf-ai-resurge...
1•zerosizedweasle•58m ago•0 comments

Moe 101 Guide: From Theory to Production

https://www.cerebras.ai/moe-guide
3•dmsobad•58m ago•1 comments

Transportation SEC says SpaceX is behind on moon trip and will reopen contracts

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/20/nasa-duffy-spacex-artemis-moon-landing.html
3•TheAlchemist•59m ago•0 comments

A Looking Glass Half Empty, Part 2: A Series of Unfortunate Events

https://www.filfre.net/2025/10/a-looking-glass-half-empty-part-2-a-series-of-unfortunate-events/
1•ibobev•1h ago•0 comments

Cut Up Your Books

https://kobold.blog/cut-up-your-books/
2•8organicbits•1h ago•0 comments

Distribution of Correlation

https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2025/10/20/distribution-of-correlation/
1•ibobev•1h ago•0 comments

Has your iPhone typing accuracy been getting worse? This video may vindicate you

https://www.phonearena.com/news/has-your-iphone-typing-accuracy-been-getting-worse-this-video-may...
4•iamben•1h ago•1 comments

Does Your Business Need a Content Strategy?

https://www.punch-tape.com/blog/does-your-business-need-a-content-strategy
1•rroumeliotis•1h ago•1 comments

AI Coding Sucks [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZUkQF6boNg
1•EPendragon•1h ago•0 comments

Witness-Network.org

https://witness-network.org/
1•ahlCVA•1h ago•0 comments

Cancer drug combo slashes risk of death by more than 40%

https://newatlas.com/cancer/prostate-cancer-drug-combo/
1•thunderbong•1h ago•0 comments

Morsel-Driven Parallelism: A NUMA-Aware Query Evaluation Framework [pdf]

https://db.in.tum.de/~leis/papers/morsels.pdf
1•ibobev•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Today is when the Amazon brain drain sent AWS down the spout

https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/20/aws_outage_amazon_brain_drain_corey_quinn/
98•raw_anon_1111•2h ago

Comments

jqpabc123•1h ago
Nothing gets sold or fixed without people who know how it's built.
nine_zeros•1h ago
But it is more important to keep the PIP, stack-ranking, ladder-climbing game running than keeping the people /s
bwfan123•13m ago
cue in: programming as theory building [1] or building systems as theory building, ie, mental causal models of how and why things work the way they do.

why not prompt ai's to fix this outage ? or maybe thats what is taking so long to fix [2] ?

[1] https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~remzi/Naur.pdf

[2] https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1980221072512635117

ChrisArchitect•1h ago
More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45640838
ortusdux•1h ago
"If you were a ‘product person’ at IBM or Xerox: so you make a better copier or better computer. So what? When you have a monopoly market-share, the company’s not any more successful. So the people who make the company more successful are the sales and marketing people, and they end up running the companies. And the ‘product people’ get run out of the decision-making forums.

The companies forget how to make great products. The product sensibility and product genius that brought them to this monopolistic position gets rotted out by people running these companies who have no conception of a good product vs. a bad product. They have no conception of the craftsmanship that’s required to take a good idea and turn it into a good product. And they really have no feeling in their hearts about wanting to help the costumers.”

- Steve Jobs - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jobs:_The_Lost_Interview

ASalazarMX•41m ago
Great words, but he lost any right to them when he made famous the "You're holding it wrong" workaround. IMO that was the defining moment when Apple started its decline on product innovation.
JustExAWS•34m ago
It was a nothingburger. Apple sold the same GSM iPhone 4 for three years with no design changes and nothing else was said about it three months later.
bobbiechen•23m ago
Well, there was a software change to smooth out how the bars would display.. https://9to5mac.com/2025/10/08/a-15-year-mystery-solved-the-...
DecentShoes•16m ago
It was not nothing. The phone stopped working if the user held it naturally in their hand. I had one. Reception completely cut out.
JustExAWS•11m ago
If it were that big of deal, don’t you think Apple would have been forced to recall it and definitely couldn’t keep selling it for 3 years. True they did redo the antenna for the Verizon CDMA iPhone 4. But they never bothered to back port the changes to the GSM one.

I also had a GSM iPhone 4.

Compare that to how quickly they ran away from the shitty Intel modems when they were selling some made by Intel and some made by Samsung (?)

behnamoh•49m ago
> It is a fact that there have been 27,000+ Amazonians impacted by layoffs between 2022 and 2024, continuing into 2025. It's hard to know how many of these were AWS versus other parts of its Amazon parent, because the company is notoriously tight-lipped about staffing issues. Internal documents reportedly say that Amazon suffers from 69 percent to 81 percent regretted attrition across all employment levels. In other words, "people quitting who we wish didn't." The internet is full of anecdata of senior Amazonians lamenting the hamfisted approach of their Return to Office initiative; experts have weighed in citing similar concerns.

So the title is all speculation. The author put 2 and 2 together and concluded that 10 is greater than 9.

Worthless article.

samrus•45m ago
Just because its speculation doesnt mean its worthless. But yeah it should be taken as speculation rather than a validated and tested hypithesis
behnamoh•39m ago
Anything that wastes my time and only reveals its half-assed reasoning half way through the article is indeed worthless.
a0123•16m ago
You could make smart inferences based on past and very frequent occurrences.

Or you could just say "there is no way the thing that constantly happens over and over again has happened once again, just no way".

Staff cuts constantly happen in the name of maximising profits. They always yield poor results for a company's performance. Every time. Especially for the consumer's side of it (not the company's finances of course).

Every time.

But maybe this time it's different. That one time.

JustExAWS•36m ago
I worked at AWS and still have friends who work there. I don’t know any L5s who wouldn’t jump at a chance to leave if they even got a slightly worse offer than what they are making now. I know a few L6s and L7s that would stick around out of momentum.

But I know very few people in the industry who know about Amazon’s reputation that have a life long dream of working there given a choice.

I was 46 when I was hired there for a “permanently remote [sic] field by design role” in ProServe and it was my 8th job out of college. I went in with my eyes wide open. I had a plan, stay for four years, sell my RSUs as soon as they vested, pay off debt, save some money, put it on my resume to open doors and make connections and leave.

I was never expecting to make more when I left. I used the time to downsize and reduce my expenses - including moving to state tax free Florida.

When I saw the writing on the wall, I played the game while I was on focus to get my next vest and wait for the “get 40k+ severance and leave immediately or try to work through the PIP”.

I took the latter and had three offers within 3 weeks. This was late 2023.

azemetre•30m ago
How long did you stick it out? Were you close toward completing your plan?
JustExAWS•23m ago
Close enough. I missed 2 vesting periods. But the severance and rapidly having a job made up for one and I got refreshers my third year that I hadn’t counted on.

I left debt free, sold my old home for exactly twice what I had built for 8 years earlier, downsized to a condo half the price I sold it for (and 1/3 the size) and I was debt free with savings.

I’m now a staff consultant working full time at a 3rd party AWS consulting firm with a lot less stress and still remote. They were the last to fall. But AWS made their ProServe department return to office at the beginning of this year.

dijit•20m ago
Maybe its speculation, but I mean drawing conclusions becomes easy when 40% of devops staff being laid off by AWS was in the news three days ago.

https://blog.stackademic.com/aws-just-fired-40-of-its-devops...

placardloop•15m ago
AWS doesn’t even have a “devops team” nor even any devops job roles. AWS also does not use Terraform (which is what the article says everyone was replaced with) at any significant scale, so this article is similar junk.
dijit•1m ago
Uh, they still have a role open for DevOps: https://amazon.jobs/en/jobs/3042892/delivery-consultant-devo...
jongjong•35m ago
Speaking of DNS, I still cannot comprehend why we still rely on the current complex, aging, centralized, rent-seeking DNS.

It's one one of the few parts of the internet which could potentially be replaced over time with very little disruption.

The hierarchy of resolvers could be replaced with a far simpler flat hierarchy Blockchain where people could buy and permanently own their domains directly on-chain... No recurring fees. People could host websites on the Blockchain from beyond the grave... This is kind of a dream of mine. Not possible to achieve in our current system.

madaxe_again•31m ago
To bake an apple pie from scratch, you must first overthrow capitalism.
chicagobuss•22m ago
perfection
tpmoney•14m ago
> People could host websites on the Blockchain from beyond the grave...

This is precisely why something like this isn't a popular solution lots of people are working towards. Domains broadly speaking aren't a finite resource, but usable domains using common words definitely are. As time marches on human readable/typeable "permanent identifiers" are going to have to go away. Email address, usernames and the like are all going to get recycled, just like phone numbers are. Domains are currently recycled and most people probably think that's a good thing.

tpmoney•14m ago
> People could host websites on the Blockchain from beyond the grave...

This is precisely why something like this isn't a popular solution lots of people are working towards. Domains broadly speaking aren't a finite resource, but usable domains using common words definitely are. As time marches on human readable/typeable "permanent identifiers" are going to have to go away. Email address, usernames and the like are all going to get recycled, just like phone numbers are. Domains are currently recycled and most people probably think that's a good thing (assuming they think about it at all)

yreg•2m ago
Also the potential for a domain to get irreversibly stolen is not a good feature for the security of the users.
tombert•6m ago
I think this would make the squatting problem that we already have way worse. There would be bots buying every single remotely usable domain, and there would be no incentive for them to sell it unless they get an absurdly large offer.

I bought tombert.com in 2014 and forgot to renew it in 2015, and it was auctioned off by GoDaddy. For like seven years, it was owned by squatters, and they wanted thousands of dollars for the domain [1]. I called offering the $100 for it, and they claimed that they can't go below $1400 because this domain is in "extremely high demand". I finally was able to buy it back in 2021, presumably because the squatter purged out domains that hadn't been purchased for N years and they wanted to save money.

Now, you could argue "see! You wouldn't have had to worry about it expiring if it were permanent on the blockchain", and that's true, but if someone else had gotten to that domain first, then I would also never get it. I think the only thing that keeps the internet even remotely fair in this regard is that domain names cost some amount of money to keep.

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20160219161720/http://www.hugedo...

chicagobuss•24m ago
internal reports from current AWS engineers seem to be confirming all of the speculation in this article. Shit's rotten from the inside out and you can pretty evenly blame AI, brain drain, and good old fashioned "big company politics"

https://forums.theregister.com/forum/all/2025/10/20/aws_outa...

pdonis•6m ago
One thing I love about El Reg is that they never shirk from calling a spade a spade.
add-sub-mul-div•4m ago
Amazon has reportedly been a shitty place to work forever, so using issues that happen to be popular today to explain turnover is disingenuous.
mlhpdx•2m ago
This is the time to accept that the path forward is keeping people and giving them the best tools you possibly can to do their work. That is, the same as has been true for decades remains so.

Yes, development tools are better every day. Yes, you can downsize. No it won’t be felt immediately. Yes, it mortgages the future and at a painfully high interest rate.

Suspending disbelief won’t make downsizing work better.