> The innocent woman was advised her children could not live with her alone until she was cleared, and the two men faced child protection referrals. The first male claimant was placed on restricted duties at work and the second had a job offer withdrawn.

> The three were never charged, and police later identified and prosecuted the actual offender who lived nearby.

> The tribunal did not find grounds for compensation or remedies for the three claimants, as the force had acted within the law and responded appropriately once the error was discovered.

I cannot believe that there is no compensation for the affected individuals. They lives were destroyed. Their employers were notified. They could not carry on their normal lives as parents. Its damage extends to the children of the defendants. Surely there should be massive compensation and also jail time for the false accusation - otherwise why would there be any incentive to do better?

https://storage.googleapis.com/dteproqbzojyte/wiring-bt-junc... [IMG]

this is typical, unless its a very small zone, then you only have a handfull.

easy to make a mistake in a rush, not so easy to identify a particular pair unless you use a probe and tracer on the dropline.

once someone knows thier pairs, they can swap for someone else. its amazing how discrete a workvest and helmet can be if line work is going on already.