Came across a book aimed at startups on how to sell to defense. Haven’t read it so I don’t know if it’s covered, but both working in defense and selling to it requires a moral code, which isn’t a requirement for guns companies or ad companies. Money incentivizes perverse behavior in people, and fulfilling fiduciary responsibility is often used as an excuse to justify reprehensible behavior. IMO, buying defense products also requires either formal or informal ethos to ensure you’re dealing with people who aren’t setting the world on fire to sell you fire extinguishers. Remember, there’s no escape shuttle to other planets. You can’t hide in your bunkers or islands forever. We’re not safer in a broken world. Selling to defense requires a moral code of first do no harm.
If you expect to be owed anything for competitive technology, frugal design or a "moral code" then you probably don't want to work in the defense sector.
nis0s•3mo ago
You’re a little right, but mostly wrong. A lot of leaders do have moral codes, it’s self-evident.
bigyabai•3mo ago
When you're an unsuccessful arms designer one day, I hope you remember this conversation.
nis0s•3mo ago
I am not an arms designer, but I am aware of the historical development of precision bombing. Look it up. The reason the word “precision” exists at all in this context has a lot to do with the existence of a moral code. People abuse the moral codes of others all the time, which is maybe the subtext of your comments.
toomuchtodo•3mo ago