Sounds pretty self-defeating.
It’s one thing to make a new firmware for PCs…
But they really don’t care about Linux or Windows? Or do they expect each to cave and support their thing because they make the world’s crap?
They simply could have written their own UEFI implementation if they so desired…
This feels more like a flex to the rest of the world than anything useful.
They are both US products, subject to export controls.
Deepin/Uniontech UOS -- based on Debian.
It has its own desktop environment, DDE, available on some Western distros and pretty good.
Kylin/OpenKylin/Ubuntu Kylin -- based on Ubuntu.
Again, its own desktop, UKUI, also available on Ubuntu itself and a few other distros.
EulerOS/OpenEuler -- based on CentOS Linux, and one of only 2 distros to have held official UNIX™ certification.
The other being Inspur K/UX, also Chinese I think.
That struck me, too.
> It explains what a virtual bus is like like 6 times in different ways
Without ever actually really nailing down what the term means for software.
As an example:
Few weeks back they had HDMI/DisplayPort alternate standardized as well.
My older BIOS motherboards boot far quicker than "modern" UEFI ones.
Updates are not a sign of technical maturity. You don't change the door to your house every year.
znpy•3mo ago
wmf•3mo ago
bcantrill•3mo ago
[0] https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0241
[1] https://www.osfc.io/2022/talks/i-have-come-to-bury-the-bios-...
ryao•3mo ago
That begs the question. What does the patrol scrubs of ECC memory on your hardware?