Should have included emberjs

right but third party libraries is where react is king

One concern I have is that after 2-3 times building the same app, you're going to be finding improvements to it that you didn't think of at the start. Thus, doing a comparison with you as the "instrument" can introduce bias. Still interesting.

Seems like a lot of decisions about frameworks come down to what solutions they support well, e.g. OAuth2 or whatever the latest and greatest authz crap is these days. I'm probably already six months out of date on that...

That article reads like it was AI-generated.

> a slow-loading app isn’t just an annoyance. It’s a liability.

> the issues I was seeing with Next.js weren’t specific to Next.js. They were fundamental to React’s architecture.

> The real performance story isn’t splitting hairs over 3ms differences, it’s the massive gap between next-gen and React/Angular.