frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

An AI model that can read and diagnose a brain MRI in seconds

https://www.michiganmedicine.org/health-lab/ai-model-can-read-and-diagnose-brain-mri-seconds
1•hhs•2m ago•0 comments

Dev with 5 of experience switched to Rails, what should I be careful about?

1•vampiregrey•4m ago•0 comments

AlphaFace: High Fidelity and Real-Time Face Swapper Robust to Facial Pose

https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16429
1•PaulHoule•5m ago•0 comments

Scientists discover “levitating” time crystals that you can hold in your hand

https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2026/february/scientists-discover--levitating--t...
1•hhs•7m ago•0 comments

Rammstein – Deutschland (C64 Cover, Real SID, 8-bit – 2019) [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VReIuv1GFo
1•erickhill•8m ago•0 comments

Tell HN: Yet Another Round of Zendesk Spam

1•Philpax•8m ago•0 comments

Postgres Message Queue (PGMQ)

https://github.com/pgmq/pgmq
1•Lwrless•12m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Django-rclone: Database and media backups for Django, powered by rclone

https://github.com/kjnez/django-rclone
1•cui•15m ago•1 comments

NY lawmakers proposed statewide data center moratorium

https://www.niagara-gazette.com/news/local_news/ny-lawmakers-proposed-statewide-data-center-morat...
1•geox•16m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw AI chatbots are running amok – these scientists are listening in

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00370-w
2•EA-3167•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI agent forgets user preferences every session. This fixes it

https://www.pref0.com/
5•fliellerjulian•18m ago•0 comments

Introduce the Vouch/Denouncement Contribution Model

https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/pull/10559
2•DustinEchoes•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: SSHcode – Always-On Claude Code/OpenCode over Tailscale and Hetzner

https://github.com/sultanvaliyev/sshcode
1•sultanvaliyev•21m ago•0 comments

Microsoft appointed a quality czar. He has no direct reports and no budget

https://jpcaparas.medium.com/microsoft-appointed-a-quality-czar-he-has-no-direct-reports-and-no-b...
2•RickJWagner•22m ago•0 comments

Multi-agent coordination on Claude Code: 8 production pain points and patterns

https://gist.github.com/sigalovskinick/6cc1cef061f76b7edd198e0ebc863397
1•nikolasi•23m ago•0 comments

Washington Post CEO Will Lewis Steps Down After Stormy Tenure

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/07/technology/washington-post-will-lewis.html
9•jbegley•24m ago•1 comments

DevXT – Building the Future with AI That Acts

https://devxt.com
2•superpecmuscles•24m ago•4 comments

A Minimal OpenClaw Built with the OpenCode SDK

https://github.com/CefBoud/MonClaw
1•cefboud•25m ago•0 comments

The silent death of Good Code

https://amit.prasad.me/blog/rip-good-code
3•amitprasad•25m ago•0 comments

The Internal Negotiation You Have When Your Heart Rate Gets Uncomfortable

https://www.vo2maxpro.com/blog/internal-negotiation-heart-rate
1•GoodluckH•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Glance – Fast CSV inspection for the terminal (SIMD-accelerated)

https://github.com/AveryClapp/glance
2•AveryClapp•27m ago•0 comments

Busy for the Next Fifty to Sixty Bud

https://pestlemortar.substack.com/p/busy-for-the-next-fifty-to-sixty-had-all-my-money-in-bitcoin-...
1•mithradiumn•28m ago•0 comments

Imperative

https://pestlemortar.substack.com/p/imperative
1•mithradiumn•29m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I decomposed 87 tasks to find where AI agents structurally collapse

https://github.com/XxCotHGxX/Instruction_Entropy
2•XxCotHGxX•33m ago•1 comments

I went back to Linux and it was a mistake

https://www.theverge.com/report/875077/linux-was-a-mistake
3•timpera•34m ago•1 comments

Octrafic – open-source AI-assisted API testing from the CLI

https://github.com/Octrafic/octrafic-cli
1•mbadyl•35m ago•1 comments

US Accuses China of Secret Nuclear Testing

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/trump-has-been-clear-wanting-new-nuclear-arms-control-treaty-...
3•jandrewrogers•36m ago•2 comments

Peacock. A New Programming Language

2•hashhooshy•41m ago•1 comments

A postcard arrived: 'If you're reading this I'm dead, and I really liked you'

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2026/02/07/postcard-death-teacher-glickman/
4•bookofjoe•42m ago•1 comments

What to know about the software selloff

https://www.morningstar.com/markets/what-know-about-software-stock-selloff
2•RickJWagner•46m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

The seven second kernel compile

http://es.tldp.org/Presentaciones/200211hispalinux/blanchard/talk_2.html
25•guerrilla•3mo ago

Comments

systemswizard•3mo ago
Please append the date on old posts like this
panki27•3mo ago
What are compile times like right now, with modern hardware?
zamadatix•3mo ago
Phoronix includes a "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation" test as part of their reviews using the default build config.

Here is one comparing some modern high end server CPUs: https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/amd-5th-gen-epyc-9... (2P = dual socket)

Here is one comparing some modern consumer CPUs: https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-...

Searching "Phoronix ${cpuModel}" will take you to the full review for that model, along with the rest of the build specs.

With the default build in a standard build environment the clock speed tends to matter more. With tuning one could probably squeeze more out of the higher core count systems.

zrm•3mo ago
Note that those two links are using different configs. Here's the link for Threadripper 9995WX:

https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-threadripper-9995wx-trx5...

That's using the same config as the server systems (allmodconfig) but it has the 9950X listed there and on that config it takes 547.23 seconds instead 47.27. That puts all of the consumer CPUs as slower than any of the server systems on the list. You can also see the five year old 2.9GHz Zen2 Threadripper 3990X in front of the brand new top of the range 4.3GHz Zen5 9950X3D because it has more cores.

You can get a pretty good idea of how kernel compiles scale with threads by comparing the results for the 1P and 2P EPYC systems that use the same CPU model. It's generally getting ~75% faster by doubling the number of cores, and that's including the cost of introducing cross-socket latency when you go from 1P to 2P systems.

zamadatix•3mo ago
Oh good catches! I must have grabbed the wrong chart from the consumer CPU benchmark, thanks for pointing out the subsequent errors. The resulting relations do make more sense (clock speed certainly helps, but there is wayyyy less of a threading wall than I had incorrectly surmised).

Here is the corrected link for the 9950X review with allmod instead of def for equal comparison (I couldn't find the def chart in the server review) https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-...

webdevver•3mo ago
21 seconds

https://openbenchmarking.org/test/pts/build-linux-kernel-1.1...

dripton•3mo ago
It varies a lot depending on how much you have enabled. The distro kernels that are designed to support as much hardware as possible take a long time to build. If you make a custom kernel where you winnow down the config to only support the hardware that's actually in your computer, there's much less code to compile so it's much faster.

I recently built a 6.17 kernel using a full Debian config, and it took about an hour on a fast machine. (Sorry, I didn't save the exact time, but the exact time would only be relevant if you had the exact same hardware and config.) I was surprised how slow it still was. It appears the benefits of faster hardware have been canceled by the amount of new code added.

emil-lp•3mo ago
One the one hand, we have Moore's law. On the other hand, kernel compilation time. Since compilation time is monotonically increasing, do we observe exponential compilation complexity in the kernel?
btilly•3mo ago
Yes. See https://accu.org/journals/overload/14/71/miller_2004/ for one reason why compilation time can easily become exponential.

In many organizations, compilation time tends to hover around a benchmark of "this is acceptable." If it is below that benchmark, nobody pays attention to performance. If it is above, someone fixes something.

In multiple interviews Linus Torvalds has said that this benchmark is about 10 minutes for him. But considering that his personal hardware gets better faster than Moore's law alone, that means that compiles get slower for the rest of us.

metanonsense•3mo ago
I remember back in 2000 or so when I declined the invitation to a party because I wanted to compile a new kernel in the evening.
ok123456•3mo ago
Did it compile?
bicolao•3mo ago
It's 2000. Build failure was pretty much expected for any software. Probably a good idea to stay home and work through any problem. Nowadays you'll just fire up a build and go. And the build is probably finished before you're out of the door.
svara•3mo ago
The way I remember it the Linux kernel compiled really reliably back then. It would take a few hours though.
ok123456•3mo ago
make config && make depend && make modules && make zImage &&
satiated_grue•2mo ago
lilo
guerrilla•2mo ago
Yes. I never had problems with Linux itself and compiled kernels constantly. What I did have incessant problems with was compiling GNOME 1.2 and 1.4. SO MANY problems, just non-stop... it was always something. I learned a bit though, although not as much as I could have if I paid attention more.
ok123456•3mo ago
I remember starting a 1.2 kernel compile on my 486 with 4 MB of RAM, going to bed, then going to school, and finding that it had finished when I came back home.
guerrilla•2mo ago
I'm guessing your hard disk was also an enormous bottleneck back then too.
ok123456•2mo ago
Everything was a bottleneck back then.
BruiseLee•3mo ago
Back in pre-module days, Slackware shipped with "big" kernel with lots of drivers compiled in. The advantage was that this way the kernel could boot on a wide range of hardware. But it was very bloated (for the time) and the users were expected to recompile the kernel with unnecessary drivers removed. I remember compiling it on Pentium 60 with 16MB of RAM. Took 1-2 hours or so.
MisterTea•3mo ago
I just measured and built the latest 9front AMD64 kernel in 15.4 seconds using a Celeron J1900 with a SATA SSD. I also posted this from 9front.
doublerabbit•3mo ago
Some say Gentoo's Stage 1 is still compiling..