frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Stop building automations. Start running your business

https://www.fluxtopus.com/automate-your-business
1•valboa•1m ago•1 comments

You can't QA your way to the frontier

https://www.scorecard.io/blog/you-cant-qa-your-way-to-the-frontier
1•gk1•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: PalettePoint – AI color palette generator from text or images

https://palettepoint.com
1•latentio•3m ago•0 comments

Robust and Interactable World Models in Computer Vision [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B4kkaGOozA
1•Anon84•7m ago•0 comments

Nestlé couldn't crack Japan's coffee market.Then they hired a child psychologist

https://twitter.com/BigBrainMkting/status/2019792335509541220
1•rmason•8m ago•0 comments

Notes for February 2-7

https://taoofmac.com/space/notes/2026/02/07/2000
2•rcarmo•10m ago•0 comments

Study confirms experience beats youthful enthusiasm

https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/07/boomers_vs_zoomers_workplace/
2•Willingham•17m ago•0 comments

The Big Hunger by Walter J Miller, Jr. (1952)

https://lauriepenny.substack.com/p/the-big-hunger
1•shervinafshar•18m ago•0 comments

The Genus Amanita

https://www.mushroomexpert.com/amanita.html
1•rolph•23m ago•0 comments

We have broken SHA-1 in practice

https://shattered.io/
4•mooreds•23m ago•2 comments

Ask HN: Was my first management job bad, or is this what management is like?

1•Buttons840•24m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How to Reduce Time Spent Crimping?

2•pinkmuffinere•26m ago•0 comments

KV Cache Transform Coding for Compact Storage in LLM Inference

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01815
1•walterbell•30m ago•0 comments

A quantitative, multimodal wearable bioelectronic device for stress assessment

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-67747-9
1•PaulHoule•32m ago•0 comments

Why Big Tech Is Throwing Cash into India in Quest for AI Supremacy

https://www.wsj.com/world/india/why-big-tech-is-throwing-cash-into-india-in-quest-for-ai-supremac...
1•saikatsg•32m ago•0 comments

How to shoot yourself in the foot – 2026 edition

https://github.com/aweussom/HowToShootYourselfInTheFoot
1•aweussom•33m ago•0 comments

Eight More Months of Agents

https://crawshaw.io/blog/eight-more-months-of-agents
4•archb•35m ago•0 comments

From Human Thought to Machine Coordination

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-digital-self/202602/from-human-thought-to-machine-coo...
1•walterbell•35m ago•0 comments

The new X API pricing must be a joke

https://developer.x.com/
1•danver0•36m ago•0 comments

Show HN: RMA Dashboard fast SAST results for monorepos (SARIF and triage)

https://rma-dashboard.bukhari-kibuka7.workers.dev/
1•bumahkib7•36m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Source code graphRAG for Java/Kotlin development based on jQAssistant

https://github.com/2015xli/jqassistant-graph-rag
1•artigent•41m ago•0 comments

Python Only Has One Real Competitor

https://mccue.dev/pages/2-6-26-python-competitor
4•dragandj•43m ago•0 comments

Tmux to Zellij (and Back)

https://www.mauriciopoppe.com/notes/tmux-to-zellij/
1•maurizzzio•44m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: How are you using specialized agents to accelerate your work?

1•otterley•45m ago•0 comments

Passing user_id through 6 services? OTel Baggage fixes this

https://signoz.io/blog/otel-baggage/
1•pranay01•46m ago•0 comments

DavMail Pop/IMAP/SMTP/Caldav/Carddav/LDAP Exchange Gateway

https://davmail.sourceforge.net/
1•todsacerdoti•46m ago•0 comments

Visual data modelling in the browser (open source)

https://github.com/sqlmodel/sqlmodel
1•Sean766•48m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tharos – CLI to find and autofix security bugs using local LLMs

https://github.com/chinonsochikelue/tharos
1•fluantix•49m ago•0 comments

Oddly Simple GUI Programs

https://simonsafar.com/2024/win32_lights/
1•MaximilianEmel•49m ago•0 comments

The New Playbook for Leaders [pdf]

https://www.ibli.com/IBLI%20OnePagers%20The%20Plays%20Summarized.pdf
1•mooreds•50m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

The seven second kernel compile

http://es.tldp.org/Presentaciones/200211hispalinux/blanchard/talk_2.html
25•guerrilla•3mo ago

Comments

systemswizard•3mo ago
Please append the date on old posts like this
panki27•3mo ago
What are compile times like right now, with modern hardware?
zamadatix•3mo ago
Phoronix includes a "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation" test as part of their reviews using the default build config.

Here is one comparing some modern high end server CPUs: https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/amd-5th-gen-epyc-9... (2P = dual socket)

Here is one comparing some modern consumer CPUs: https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-...

Searching "Phoronix ${cpuModel}" will take you to the full review for that model, along with the rest of the build specs.

With the default build in a standard build environment the clock speed tends to matter more. With tuning one could probably squeeze more out of the higher core count systems.

zrm•3mo ago
Note that those two links are using different configs. Here's the link for Threadripper 9995WX:

https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-threadripper-9995wx-trx5...

That's using the same config as the server systems (allmodconfig) but it has the 9950X listed there and on that config it takes 547.23 seconds instead 47.27. That puts all of the consumer CPUs as slower than any of the server systems on the list. You can also see the five year old 2.9GHz Zen2 Threadripper 3990X in front of the brand new top of the range 4.3GHz Zen5 9950X3D because it has more cores.

You can get a pretty good idea of how kernel compiles scale with threads by comparing the results for the 1P and 2P EPYC systems that use the same CPU model. It's generally getting ~75% faster by doubling the number of cores, and that's including the cost of introducing cross-socket latency when you go from 1P to 2P systems.

zamadatix•3mo ago
Oh good catches! I must have grabbed the wrong chart from the consumer CPU benchmark, thanks for pointing out the subsequent errors. The resulting relations do make more sense (clock speed certainly helps, but there is wayyyy less of a threading wall than I had incorrectly surmised).

Here is the corrected link for the 9950X review with allmod instead of def for equal comparison (I couldn't find the def chart in the server review) https://www.phoronix.com/benchmark/result/amd-ryzen-9-9900x-...

webdevver•3mo ago
21 seconds

https://openbenchmarking.org/test/pts/build-linux-kernel-1.1...

dripton•3mo ago
It varies a lot depending on how much you have enabled. The distro kernels that are designed to support as much hardware as possible take a long time to build. If you make a custom kernel where you winnow down the config to only support the hardware that's actually in your computer, there's much less code to compile so it's much faster.

I recently built a 6.17 kernel using a full Debian config, and it took about an hour on a fast machine. (Sorry, I didn't save the exact time, but the exact time would only be relevant if you had the exact same hardware and config.) I was surprised how slow it still was. It appears the benefits of faster hardware have been canceled by the amount of new code added.

emil-lp•3mo ago
One the one hand, we have Moore's law. On the other hand, kernel compilation time. Since compilation time is monotonically increasing, do we observe exponential compilation complexity in the kernel?
btilly•3mo ago
Yes. See https://accu.org/journals/overload/14/71/miller_2004/ for one reason why compilation time can easily become exponential.

In many organizations, compilation time tends to hover around a benchmark of "this is acceptable." If it is below that benchmark, nobody pays attention to performance. If it is above, someone fixes something.

In multiple interviews Linus Torvalds has said that this benchmark is about 10 minutes for him. But considering that his personal hardware gets better faster than Moore's law alone, that means that compiles get slower for the rest of us.

metanonsense•3mo ago
I remember back in 2000 or so when I declined the invitation to a party because I wanted to compile a new kernel in the evening.
ok123456•3mo ago
Did it compile?
bicolao•3mo ago
It's 2000. Build failure was pretty much expected for any software. Probably a good idea to stay home and work through any problem. Nowadays you'll just fire up a build and go. And the build is probably finished before you're out of the door.
svara•3mo ago
The way I remember it the Linux kernel compiled really reliably back then. It would take a few hours though.
ok123456•3mo ago
make config && make depend && make modules && make zImage &&
satiated_grue•2mo ago
lilo
guerrilla•2mo ago
Yes. I never had problems with Linux itself and compiled kernels constantly. What I did have incessant problems with was compiling GNOME 1.2 and 1.4. SO MANY problems, just non-stop... it was always something. I learned a bit though, although not as much as I could have if I paid attention more.
ok123456•3mo ago
I remember starting a 1.2 kernel compile on my 486 with 4 MB of RAM, going to bed, then going to school, and finding that it had finished when I came back home.
guerrilla•2mo ago
I'm guessing your hard disk was also an enormous bottleneck back then too.
ok123456•2mo ago
Everything was a bottleneck back then.
BruiseLee•3mo ago
Back in pre-module days, Slackware shipped with "big" kernel with lots of drivers compiled in. The advantage was that this way the kernel could boot on a wide range of hardware. But it was very bloated (for the time) and the users were expected to recompile the kernel with unnecessary drivers removed. I remember compiling it on Pentium 60 with 16MB of RAM. Took 1-2 hours or so.
MisterTea•3mo ago
I just measured and built the latest 9front AMD64 kernel in 15.4 seconds using a Celeron J1900 with a SATA SSD. I also posted this from 9front.
doublerabbit•3mo ago
Some say Gentoo's Stage 1 is still compiling..