This is a personal blog post of one of its board members.
dang•3mo ago
That's right, but the test we use is "are two articles different enough to support a substantively different discussion". In this case the answer is clearly no, so they fall in the same equivalence class.
We do that all the time, of course—just not enough to satisfy those who would like (a lot) more. But we have the rest of the community to think about as well.
Lerc•3mo ago
Do you have any data on what tends to get inappropriately flagged?
I'm not sure if it would be productive to share such information, but can't help being curious about it.
dang•3mo ago
I can't really answer that because it's not clear what "inappropriately" means. Everyone seems to have a different definition!
arccy•3mo ago
whooooosh•3mo ago
That's a statement from the PSF.
This is a personal blog post of one of its board members.
dang•3mo ago
(We'll put a link to https://simonwillison.net/2025/Oct/27/psf-withdrawn-proposal... in the toptext of the other post though)
whooooosh•3mo ago
dang•3mo ago
Lerc•3mo ago
I'm not sure if it would be productive to share such information, but can't help being curious about it.
dang•3mo ago
simonw•3mo ago
dang•3mo ago