Sure, now make it work without having to type "\\w"
ssalbdivad•3mo ago
Yes, there are limits on what string literals can precisely represent, but we've tried to be pragmatic about trade offs around clarity, concision and performance.
Subexpressions like `\\w` or `[a-Z]` would just be inferred as `${string}`, but that doesn't mean the inference won't be useful. For example:
wredcoll•3mo ago
ssalbdivad•3mo ago
Subexpressions like `\\w` or `[a-Z]` would just be inferred as `${string}`, but that doesn't mean the inference won't be useful. For example:
expression: regex("^\\w+@\\w+\\.\\w+$") type: Regex<`${string}@${string}.${string}`>
wredcoll•3mo ago
ssalbdivad•3mo ago
wredcoll•3mo ago