Why doesn’t UCLA or the University of California system (UCLA is a part), solve this for Tao’s program so that he can focus on the things he is uniquely positioned to do? I suppose it could’ve because he IS the marketing…
qwerpy•2h ago
The headline "Terence Tao focused on fundraising after federal funding to UCLA was suspended" also makes for better marketing than "UCLA diverts tiny part of massive war chest to address temporary funding issue".
Yeul•2h ago
The headline should be that America no longer has free and independent universities and is speed running China.
Larrikin•12m ago
Maybe the USSR, China still seems to be innovating.
stiglitz•2h ago
That doesn’t seem like an accurate synopsis of the article at all.
parkaboy•3h ago
UCLA has a $10B endowment. I find it bollocks that they and these other academic institutions can't just dip into that for their researchers to (hopefully) ride out the current funding situation at a minimum.
intermerda•1h ago
You don't understand endowments, do you?
It's not a checking account in which you can dip into any time you want when you need to deal with an anti-science, fascist administration.
veggieroll•1h ago
The vast majority of people talking about how big university endowments are don't care what the rules are on it. It's not that people don't know how endowments work; they just find the rules to be bullshit to justify universities continuing the status quo.
dekhn•59m ago
It's not bollocks, the endowments are contributions that have constraints on their spending. They cannot legally redirect much of the endowment towards these researchers in the way you want. Instead, they use the endowment as an investment that produces interest which is spent on operating expenses.
yurivish•4h ago