I guess you could get a Ryzen AI Max+ with 128GB RAM to try and do that locally but non-nVidia hardware is incredibly slow for coding usage since the prompts become very large and take exponentially longer but gpt-oss is a sparse model so maybe it won't be that bad.

Also just to point it out, if you use OpenRouter with things like Aider or roocode or whatever you can also flag your account to only use providers with a zero-data retention policy if you are truly concerned about anyone training on your source code. GPT5 and Claude are infinitely better, faster and cheaper than anything I can do locally and I have a monster setup.

Give it time, we'll get there, but not anytime soon.

Kept it simple: ollama, whatever the latest model is in fashion [when I'm looking]. Feel silly to name any one in particular, I make them compete. I usually don't bother: I know the docs I need.

If anyone has suggestions on other models, as an experiment I tried asking it to design me a new latex resumé and it struggled for two hours with the request to put my name prominently at the top in a grey box with my email and phone number beside it.

My only complaint is agent mode needs good token gen so I only go agent mode on the RTX machine.

I grew up on 9600baud so I’m cool with watching the text crawl.

Also I could think that a local model just for autocomplete could help reducing latency for completion suggestions.

In more cases than expected, the M1/M2 Ultras are still quite capable, especially performance power per watt of electricity, as well as ability to serve one user.

The Mac Studio has better bang for the buck than the laptop for computational power to price.

Depending on your needs, the M5's might be worth waiting for, but M2 Max onward are quite capable with enough ram. Even the M1 Max continues to be a workhorse.

Gos-oss:20b and qwen3 coder/instruct, devstrall are my usual.

Ps. Definitely check out open-web ui.

I'm running mainly GPT-OSS-120b/20b depending on the task, Magistral for multimodal stuff and some smaller models I've fine-tuned myself for specific tasks..

All the software is implemented by myself, but I started out with basically calling out to llama.cpp, as it was the simplest and fastest option that let me integrate it into my own software without requiring a GUI.

I use Codex and Claude Code from time to time to do some mindless work too, Codex hooked up to my local GPT-OSS-120b while Claude Code uses Sonnet.

> What laptop hardware do you have (CPU, GPU/NPU, memory, whether discrete GPU or integrated, OS) and how it performs for your workflow?

Desktop, Ryzen 9 5950X, 128GB of RAM, RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell (96GB VRAM), performs very well and I can run most of the models I use daily all together, unless I want really large context then just GPT-OSS-120B + max context, ends up taking ~70GB of VRAM.

> What kinds of tasks you use it for (code completion, refactoring, debugging, code review) and how reliable it is (what works well / where it falls short).

Almost anything and everything, but mostly coding. But then general questions, researching topics, troubleshooting issues with my local infrastructure, troubleshooting things happening in my other hobbies and a bunch of other stuff. As long as you give the local LLM access to a search tool (I use YaCy + my own adapter), local models works better for me than the hosted models, mainly because of the speed and I have better control over the inference.

It does fall short on really complicated stuff. Right now I'm trying to do CUDA programming, creating a fused MoE kernel for inference in Rust, and it's a bit tricky as there are a lot of moving parts and I don't understand the subject 100%, and when you get to that point, it's a bit hit or miss. You really need to have a proper understanding of what you use the LLM for, otherwise it breaks down quickly. Divide and conquer as always helps a lot.

In terms of models, qwen2.5-coder:3b is a good compromise for autocomplete, as agent choose pretty much just the biggest sota model you can run

For VSCode I use continue.dev as it allows to set my own (short) system prompt. I get around 50token/sec generation and prompt processing 550t/s.

When giving well defined small tasks, it is as good as any frontier model.

I like the speed and low latency and the availability while on the plane/train or off-grid.

Also decent FIM with the llama.cpp VSCode plugin.

If I need more intelligence my personal favourites are Claude and Deepseek via API.

I haven't found a local model that fits on a 64GB Mac or 128GB Spark yet that appears to be good enough to reliably run bash-in-a-loop over multiple turns, but maybe I haven't tried the right combination of models and tools.

I had to create a custom image of llama.cpp compiled with vulkan so the LLMs can access the GPU on my MacBook Air M4 from inside the containers for inference. It's much faster, like 8-10x faster than without.

To be honest so far I've been using mostly cloud models for coding, the local models haven't been that great.

Some more details on the blog: https://markjgsmith.com/posts/2025/10/12/just-use-llamacpp

It’s not very fast, and I built it up slowly without knowing quite where I was headed. If I could do it over again, I’d go with a recent EPYC with 12 channels of DDR5 and pair it with a single RTX 6000 Pro Blackwell.

Open-source coding assistant: VT Code (my own coding agent -- github.com/vinhnx/vtcode) Model: gpt-oss-120b remote hosted via Ollama cloud experimental

> What laptop hardware do you have (CPU, GPU/NPU, memory, whether discrete GPU or integrated, OS) and how it performs for your workflow?

Macbook Pro M1

> What kinds of tasks you use it for (code completion, refactoring, debugging, code review) and how reliable it is (what works well / where it falls short).

All agentic coding workflow (debug, refactor, refine and testing sandbox execution). VT Code is currently in preview and being active developed, but currently it is mostly stable.

LM Studio + gpt-oss + aider

Works quite quickly. Sometimes I just chat with it via LM Studio when I need a general idea for how to proceed with an issue. Otherwise, I typically use aider to do some pair programming work. It isn't always accurate, but it's often at least useful.

https://www.youtube.com/@AZisk

At this point, pretty much all he does is review workstations for running LLM's and other machine-learning adjacent tasks.

I'm not his target demographic, but because I'm a dev, his videos are constantly recommended to me on YouTube. He's a good presenter and his advice makes a lot of sense.

On an RTX 3080 Ti+Ryzen 9

I love local models for some use cases. However for coding there is a big gap between the quality of models you can run at home and those you can't (at least on hardware I can afford) like GLM 4.6, Sonnet 4.5, Codex 5, Qwen Coder 408.

What makes local coding models compelling?

Here's my ollama config:

https://github.com/woile/nix-config/blob/main/hosts/aconcagu...

I'm not an AI power user. I like to code, and I like the AI to autocomplete snippets that are "logical", I don't use agents, and for that, it's good enough.

  Models
    gpt-oss-120b, Meta Llama 3.2, or Gemma
    (just depends on what I’m doing)

  Hardware
    - Apple M4 Max (128 GB RAM)
      paired with a GPD Win 4 running Ubuntu 24.04 over USB-C networking

  Software
    - Claude Code
    - RA.Aid
    - llama.cpp

  For CUDA computing, I use an older NVIDIA RTX 2080 in an old System76 workstation.

  Process

    I create a good INSTRUCTIONS.md for Claude/Raid that specifies a task & production process with a task list it maintains. I use Claude Agents with an Agent Organizer that helps determine which agents to use. It creates the architecture, prd and security design, writes the code, and then lints, tests and does a code review.

Here's the pull request I made to Aider for using local models:

https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider/issues/4526

- auto git commit message

- auto jira ticket creation from git diff

On the laptop, I don't use any local models. Not powerful enough.

I use it to do simple text-based tasks occasionally if my Internet is down or ChatGPT is down.

I also use it in VS Code to help with code completion using the Continue extension.

I created a Firefox extension so I can use Open WebUI in my browser by pressing Cmd+Shift+Space too when I am browsing the web and want to ask a question: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/foxyai/

For actual real work, I use Claude.

If you want to use an open weights model to get real work done, the sensible thing would be to rent a GPU in the cloud. I'd be inclined to run llama.cpp because I know it well enough, but vLLM would make more sense for models that runs entirely on the GPU.

My daily drivers though are still either Codex or GPT5, Claude Code used to be but it just doesn't deliver the same results as it has previously.

I have a MacBook Pro with an M4 Pro chip, and 24GB of RAM, I believe only 16 of it is usable by the models, so I can run the GPT OSS 20B model (iirc) but the smaller one. It can do a bit, but the context window fills up quickly, so I do find myself switching context windows often enough. I do wonder if a maxed out MacBook Pro would be able to run larger context windows, then I would easily be able to code all day with it offline.

I do think Macs are phenomenal at running local LLMs if you get the right one.

Tools: LM Studio for playing around with models, the ones I stabilize on for work go into ollama.

Models: Qwen3 Coder 30b is the one I come back to most for coding tasks. It is decent in isolation but not so much at the multi-step, context-heavy agentic work that the hosted frontier models are pushing forward. Which is understandable.

I've found the smaller models (the 7B Qwen coder models, gpt-oss-20B, gemma-7b) extremely useful given they respond so fast (~80t/s for gpt-oss-20B on the above hardware), making them faster to get to an answer than Googling or asking ChatGPT (and fast to see if they're failing to answer so I can move on to something else).

Use cases: Mostly small one-off questions (like 'what is the syntax for X SQL feature on Postgres', 'write a short python script that does Y') where the response comes back quicker than Google, ChatGPT, or even trying to remember it myself.

Doing some coding with Aider and a VS Code plugin (kinda clunky integration), but I quickly end up escalating anything hard to hosted frontier models (Anthropic, OpenAI via their clis or Cursor). I often hit usage limits on the hosted models so it's nice to have a way my dumbest questions don't burn tokens I want to reserve for real work.

Small LLM scripting tasks with dspy (simple categorization, CSV munging type tasks), sometimes larger RAG/agent type things with LangChain but it's a lot of overhead for personal scripts.

My company is building a software product that heavily utilizes LLMs so I often point my local dev environment at my local model (whatever's loaded, usually one of the 7B models), initially I did this not to incur costs but as prices have come down it's now more as it's less latency and I can test interface changes etc faster - especially as new thinking models can take a long time to respond.

It is also helpful to try and build LLM functions that work with small models as it means they run efficiently and portably on larger ones. One technical debt trap I have noticed with building for LLMs is that as large models get better you can get away with stuffing them with crap and still getting good results... up until you don't.

It's remarkable how fast things are moving in the local LLM world, right now the Qwen/gpt-oss models "feel" like gpt-3.5-turbo did a couple of years back which is remarkable given how groundbreaking (and expensive to train) 3.5 was and now you can get similar results on sub-$2k consumer hardware.

However, its very much still in the "tinkerer" phase where it's overall a net productivity loss (and massive financial loss) vs just paying $20/mo for a hosted frontier model.

Also are there good solutions for searching through a local collection of documents?

Platform: LMStudio (primarily) & Ollama

Models:

- qwen/qwen3-coder-30b A3B Instruct 8-bit MLX

- mlx-community/gpt-oss-120b-MXFP4-Q8

For code generation especially for larger projects, these models aren't as good as the cutting edge foundation models. For summarizing local git repos/libraries, generating documentation and simple offline command-line tool-use they do a good job.

I find these communities quite vibrant and helpful too:

- https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLM/

- https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/

I think for stuff that isn’t super private like code and such, it’s not worth the effort

My current setup is the llama-vscode plugin + llama-server running Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct. It leads to very fast completions, and don't have to worry about internet outages which take me out of the zone.

I do wish qwen-3 released a 7B model supporting FIM tokens. 7B seems to be the sweet spot for fast and usable completions

1. $ npm install -g @openai/codex

2. $ brew install ollama; ollama serve

3. $ ollama pull gpt-oss:20b

4. $ codex --oss -m gpt-oss:20b

This runs locally without Internet. Idk if there’s telemetry for codex, but you should be able to turn that off if so.

You need an M1 Mac or better with at least 24GB of GPU memory. The model is pretty big, about 16GB of disk space in ~/.ollama

Be careful - the 120b model is 1.5× better than this 20b variant, but takes 5× higher requirements.

Ingested election laws of 50 states, territories and Federal.

Goal. Mapping out each feature of the election and deal with (in)consistent terminologies sprouted by different university-trained public administration. This is the crux of hallunications: getting a diagram of ballot handling and their terminologies.

Then maybe tackle the multitude ways of election irregularities, or at least point out integrity gaps at various locales.

https://figshare.com/articles/presentation/Election_Frauds_v...

I get a steady stream of tokens, slightly slower than my reading pace, which I find is more than fast enough. In fact I´d only replace with exact same, or maybe M2 + Asahi with enough RAM to run the bigger Qwen3 model.

I saw qwen3-coder mentioned here. I didnt know about that one. Anyone got any thoughts on how that compares to qwen3? Will it also fit in 32GB?

I'm not interested in agents, or tool integration, and especially wont use anything cloud. I like to own my env. and code top-to-bottom. Having also switched to Kate and Fossil it feels like my perfect dev environment.

Currently using an older Ollama, but will switch to llama.cpp now that ollama has pivoted away from offline only. I got llama.cpp installed, but not sure how to reuse my models from ollama, I thought ollama was just a wrapper, but they seems to be different model formats?

[edit] be sure to use it powered, linux is a bit battery heavy, but Qwen3 will pull 60W+ and flatten a battery real fast.