Pretty fascinating stuff regardless of your opinions.
About the people involved, Barak is an unsavoury character and Epstein was of course evil on a different level. Of course they are totally eclipsed by Assad and Putin who are many orders of magnitude more evil.
Looking back at their plans from a historical point of view. They were only partially successful and it's true that until the recent war Russia and Israel at least communicated quite closely over Syria even if they didn't necessarily see eye to eye.
Earlier this year Israel finally achieved what they wanted with the collapse of the Assad regime. It doesn't hurt that Russias influence is dramatically weakened. Best of all the new order has no great love for Iran or their Hezbolla affiliates and are not openly hostile to Israel and are trying to court the West. I can only hope their situation will genuinely improve.
Finally, of course the US at long last bombed Irans nuclear program hopefully permanently ending it or setting it back a decade or two. So there you have it, a decade long story of intrigue, politics and scandal enough to fill a novel, with plenty of morally grey areas because real life isn't black and white.
drysine•3mo ago
>Barak is an unsavoury character and Epstein was of course evil on a different level. Of course they are totally eclipsed by Assad and Putin who are many orders of magnitude more evil.
>Best of all the new order
And "the new order" is the least evil of them all?
"The former head of Syria’s al-Nusra Front had a $10m [American] bounty on his head for organising “multiple terrorist attacks throughout Syria, often targeting civilians”."[0]
"Under al-Shara'a's leadership, al-Nusra Front and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham perpetrated a series of war crimes, suicide bombings, forced conversions, ethnic cleansing and sectarian massacres against Syria's Christian, Alawite, Shia and Druze minorities."[1]
FridayoLeary•3mo ago
About the people involved, Barak is an unsavoury character and Epstein was of course evil on a different level. Of course they are totally eclipsed by Assad and Putin who are many orders of magnitude more evil.
Looking back at their plans from a historical point of view. They were only partially successful and it's true that until the recent war Russia and Israel at least communicated quite closely over Syria even if they didn't necessarily see eye to eye.
Earlier this year Israel finally achieved what they wanted with the collapse of the Assad regime. It doesn't hurt that Russias influence is dramatically weakened. Best of all the new order has no great love for Iran or their Hezbolla affiliates and are not openly hostile to Israel and are trying to court the West. I can only hope their situation will genuinely improve.
Finally, of course the US at long last bombed Irans nuclear program hopefully permanently ending it or setting it back a decade or two. So there you have it, a decade long story of intrigue, politics and scandal enough to fill a novel, with plenty of morally grey areas because real life isn't black and white.
drysine•3mo ago
>Best of all the new order
And "the new order" is the least evil of them all?
"The former head of Syria’s al-Nusra Front had a $10m [American] bounty on his head for organising “multiple terrorist attacks throughout Syria, often targeting civilians”."[0]
"Under al-Shara'a's leadership, al-Nusra Front and Jabhat Fateh al-Sham perpetrated a series of war crimes, suicide bombings, forced conversions, ethnic cleansing and sectarian massacres against Syria's Christian, Alawite, Shia and Druze minorities."[1]
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/24/ahmed-al-shara...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_al-Sharaa#War_crimes_of_...