He added the government's deal with Boeing "fails to secure the necessary accountability to ensure the safety of the flying public."
(Per non-paywalled article on the same topic https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/boeing-criminal-case-agreement...)
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/civil-trial-737-max-cras...
Does that mean from a manufacturer perspective it's less costly if your faulty plane kills people quickly, like a bug being splatted, rather than hanging on longer and putting passengers through a grueling ordeal? In a sense, does that create somewhat perverse incentives? Or is this a pretty unique scenario due to the nature of the malfunction and its direct involvement on G-forces passengers experienced prior to the crash?
dtagames•3mo ago