The peer-review process is the heartbeat of academic publishing. It is how researchers ensure that knowledge moves forward through scrutiny, feedback, and validation. Authors submit their manuscripts to journals or conferences, and editors send them to other experts who assess the work's originality, rigour, and relevance.

In this blog, I try to dissect the question: Should the names of reviewers be made public alongside the papers they review?

There is a policy in every conference and journal to add the conflict of interest so I don't think that reviewer name should be added. This make this things more biased and reviewer can not review the entire study with confidence.