You can always identify the OpenAI result because it's yellow.
jstummbillig•48m ago
> If you made it all the way down here you probably don’t need a summary
Love the optimism
LogicFailsMe•10m ago
I skipped to the end to see if they did any local models. spoilers: they didn't.
sema4hacker•34m ago
Are artists and illustrators going the way of the horse and buggy?
kevin009•31m ago
Everyday I generate more than 600 image and also compare them, it takes me 5 hours
alienbaby•24m ago
Interesting experiment, though I'm not certain quite how the models are usefully compared.
th0ma5•19m ago
This seems to imply that the capabilities being tested are like the descriptive words used in the prompts, but, as a category using random words would be just as valid for exercising the extents of the underlying math. And when I think of that reality I wonder why a list of tests like this should be interesting and to what ends. The repeated nature of the iteration implies that some control or better quality is being sought but the mechanism of exploration is just trial and error and not informative of what would be repeatable success for anyone else in any other circumstance given these discoveries.
XYZ12334•13m ago
Waiting for the SimonW futa conversion benchmark
fsniper•5m ago
Is it me or ChatGPT change subtle or sometimes more prominent things? Like ball holding position of the hand, face features like for head, background trees and alike?
Dwedit•59m ago