frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

AI World Clocks

https://clocks.brianmoore.com/
131•waxpancake•1h ago
"Every minute, a new clock is rendered by nine different AI models."

Comments

kfarr•1h ago
Add some voting and you got yourself an AI World Clock arena! https://artificialanalysis.ai/image/arena
syx•1h ago
I’m very curious about the monthly bill for such a creative project, surely some of these are pre rendered?
coffeecoders•35m ago
Napkin math:

9 AIs × 43,200 minutes = 388,800 requests/month

388,800 requests × 200 tokens = 77,760,000 tokens/month ≈ 78M tokens

Cost varies from 10 cents to $1 per 1M tokens.

Using the mid-price, the cost is around $50/month.

---

Hopefully, the OP has this endpoint protected - https://clocks.brianmoore.com/api/clocks?time=11:19AM

ugh123•59m ago
Cool, and marginally informative on the current state of things. but kind of a waste of energy given everything is re-done every minute to compare. We'd probably only need a handful of each to see the meaningful differences.
whoisjuan•52m ago
It's actually quite fascinating if you watch it for 5 minutes. Some models are overall bad, but others nail it in one minute and butcher it in the next.

It's perhaps the best example I have seen of model drift driven by just small, seemingly unimportant changes to the prompt.

alister•38m ago
> model drift driven by just small, seemingly unimportant changes to the prompt

What changes to the prompt are you referring to?

According the comment on the site, the prompt is the following:

Create HTML/CSS of an analog clock showing ${time}. Include numbers (or numerals) if you wish, and have a CSS animated second hand. Make it responsive and use a white background. Return ONLY the HTML/CSS code with no markdown formatting.

The prompt doesn't seem to change.

sambaumann•28m ago
presumably the time is replaced with the actual current time at each generation. I wonder if they are actually generated every minute or if all 6480 permutations (720 minutes in a day * 9 llms) were generated and just show on a schedule
whoisjuan•12m ago
The time given to the model. So the difference between two generations is just somethng trivially different like: "12:35" vs 12:36"
moffkalast•31m ago
Kimi seems the only reliable one which is a bit surprising, and GPT 4o is consistently better than GPT 5 which on the other hand is unfortunately not surprising at all.
nbaugh1•21m ago
It is really interesting to watch them for a while. QWEN keeps outputting some really abstract interpretations of a clock, KIMI is consistently very good, GPT5's results line up exactly with my experience with its code output (overly complex and never working correctly)
ascorbic•51m ago
The energy usage is minuscule.
jdiff•42m ago
It's wasteful. If someone built a clock out of 47 microservices that called out to 193 APIs to check the current time, location, time zone, and preferred display format we'd rightfully criticize it for similar reasons.

In a world where Javascript and Electron are still getting (again, rightfully) skewered for inefficiency despite often exceeding the performance of many compiled languages, we should not dismiss the discussion around efficiency so easily.

Arisaka1•36m ago
What I find amusing with this argument is that, no one ever brought power savings when e.g. used "let me google that for you" instead of giving someone the answer to their question, because we saw the utility of teaching others how to Google. But apparently we can't see the utility of measuring the oversold competence of current AI models, given sufficiently large sampling size.
saulpw•20m ago
Let's do some math.

60x24x30 = 40k AI calls per month per model. Let's suppose there are 1000 output tokens (might it be 10k tokens? Seems like a lot for this task). So 40m tokens per model.

The price for 1m output tokens[0] ranges from $.10 (qwen-2.5) to $60 (GPT-4). So $4/mo for the cheapest, and $2.5k/mo for the most expensive.

So this might cost several thousand dollars a month? Something smells funny. But you're right, throttling it to once an hour would achieve a similar goal and likely cost less than $100/mo (which is still more than I would spend on a project like this).

[0] https://pricepertoken.com/

energy123•7m ago
I sort of assumed they cached like 30 inferences and just repeat them, but maybe I'm being too cynical.
PeterStuer•59m ago
Why? This is diagonal to how LLM's work, and trivially solved by a minimal hybrid front/sub system.
em3rgent0rdr•56m ago
To gauge.
bayindirh•54m ago
Because, LLMs are touted to be the silver bullet of silver bullets. Built upon world's knowledge, and with the capacity to call upon updated information with agents, they are ought to rival the top programmers 3 days ago.
awkwam•28m ago
They might be touted like that but it seems like you don't understand how they work. The example in the article shows that the prompt is limiting the LLM by giving it access to only 2000 tokens and also saying "ONLY OUTPUT ...". This is like me asking you to solve the same problem but forcing you do de-activate half of your brain + forget any programming experience you have. It's just stupid.
bayindirh•19m ago
> like you don't understand how they work.

I would not make such assumptions.

> The example in the article shows that the prompt is limiting the LLM by giving it access to only 2000 tokens and also saying "ONLY OUTPUT ..."

The site is pretty simple, method is pretty straightforward. If you believe this is unfair, you can always build one yourself.

> It's just stupid.

No, it's a great way of testing things within constraints.

em3rgent0rdr•58m ago
Most look like they were done by a beginner programmer on crack, but every once in a while a correct one appears.
morkalork•57m ago
I'd say more like a blind programmer in the early stages of dementia. Able to write code, unable to form a mental image of what it would render as and can't see the final result.
pixl97•56m ago
DeepSeek and Kimi seem to have correct ones most of the time I've looked.
em3rgent0rdr•53m ago
yes, and sometimes Grok.
pixl97•19m ago
The hour hand commonly seems off on Grok.
shafoshaf•46m ago
It's interesting how drawing a clock is one of the primary signals for dementia. https://www.verywellhealth.com/the-clock-drawing-test-98619
energy123•6m ago
If they can identify which one is correct, then it's the same as always being correct, just with an expensive compute budget.
larodi•56m ago
would be gr8t to also see the prompt this was done with
creade•53m ago
The ? has "Create HTML/CSS of an analog clock showing ${time}. Include numbers (or numerals) if you wish, and have a CSS animated second hand. Make it responsive and use a white background. Return ONLY the HTML/CSS code with no markdown formatting."
bananatron•55m ago
grok's looks like one of those clocks you'd find at a novelty shop
AlfredBarnes•52m ago
Its cool to see them get it right .....sometimes
zkmon•51m ago
Why are Deepseek and Kimi are beating other models by so much margin? Is this to do with their specialization for this task?
baltimore•50m ago
Since the first (good) image generation models became available, I've been trying to get them to generate an image of a clock with 13 instead of the usual 12 hour divisions. I have not been successful. Usually they will just replace the "12" with a "13" and/or mess up the clock face in some other way.

I'd be interested if anyone else is successful. Share how you did it!

snek_case•45m ago
From my experience they quickly fail to understand anything beyond a superficial description of the image you want.
atorodius•23m ago
That's less and less true

https://minimaxir.com/2025/11/nano-banana-prompts/

dang•22m ago
Related ongoing thread:

Nano Banana can be prompt engineered for nuanced AI image generation - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45917875 - Nov 2025 (214 comments)

Scene_Cast2•43m ago
I've noticed that image models are particularly bad at modifying popular concepts in novel ways (way worse "generalization" than what I observe in language models).
IAmGraydon•37m ago
That's because they literally cannot do that. Doing what you're asking requires an understanding of why the numbers on the clock face are where they are and what it would mean if there was an extra hour on the clock (ie that you would have to divide 360 by 13 to begin to understand where the numbers would go). AI models have no concept of anything that's not included in their training data. Yet people continue to anthropomorphize this technology and are surprised when it becomes obvious that it's not actually thinking.
bobbylarrybobby•33m ago
It's interesting because if you asked them to write code to generate an SVG of a clock, they'd probably use a loop from 1 to 12, using sin and cos of the angle (given by the loop index over 12 times 2pi) to place the numerals. They know how to do this, and so they basically understand the process that generates a clock face. And extrapolating from that to 13 hours is trivial (for a human). So the fact that they can't do this extrapolation on their own is very odd.
echelon•33m ago
gpt-image-1 and Google Imagen understand prompts, they just don't have training data to cover these use cases.

gpt-image-1 and Imagen are wickedly smart.

The new Nano Banana 2 that has been briefly teased around the internet can solve incredibly complicated differential equations on chalk boards with full proof of work.

energy123•12m ago
The hope was for this understanding to emerge as the most efficient solution to the next-token prediction problem.

Put another way, it was hoped that once the dataset got rich enough, developing this understanding is actually more efficient for the neural network than memorizing a dictionary of trite facts in the training data.

And if it is more efficient, and a few other assumptions hold, then that's what the neural network will learn.

This hope is not fully unreasonable. Many smart people believed in it, and still do.

The useful question to ask, if you believe the hope is not bearing fruit, is why. Point specifically to the absent data or the flawed assumption being made.

Or more realistically, put in the creative and difficult work required to discover the answer to that question. I certainly don't know the answer to this question. Most people don't.

ryandrake•8m ago
I wonder if you would have more success if you painstakingly described the shape and features of a clock in great detail but never used the words clock or time or anything that might give the AI the hint that they were supposed to output something like a clock.
echelon•34m ago
That's just a patch to the training data.

Once companies see this starting to show up in the evals and criticisms, they'll go out of their way to fix it.

coffeecoders•29m ago
LLMs are terrible for out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks. You should use chain of thought suppression and give constaints explictly.

My prompt to Grok:

---

Follow these rules exactly:

- There are 13 hours, labeled 1–13.

- There are 13 ticks.

- The center of each number is at angle: index * (360/13)

- Do not infer anything else.

- Do not apply knowledge of normal clocks.

Use the following variables:

HOUR_COUNT = 13

ANGLE_PER_HOUR = 360 / 13 // 27.692307°

Use index i ∈ [0..12] for hour marks:

angle_i = i * ANGLE_PER_HOUR

I want html/css (single file) of a 13-hour analog clock.

---

Output from grok.

https://jsfiddle.net/y9zukcnx/1/

BrandoElFollito•18m ago
Well, that's cheating :) You asked it to generate code, which is ok because it does not represent a direct generated image of a clock.

Can grok generate images? What would the result be?

I will try your prompt on chatgpt and gemini

BrandoElFollito•13m ago
Gemini failed miserably - a standard 12 hours clock

Same for chatgpt

And perplexity replaced 12 with 13

chemotaxis•12m ago
> Follow these rules exactly:

"Here's the line-by-line specification of the program I need you to write. Write that program."

chiwilliams•5m ago
I'll also note that the output isn't quite right --- the top number should be 13 rather than 1!
BrandoElFollito•21m ago
This is really cool. I tried to prompt gemini but every time I got the same picture. I do not know how to share a session (like it is possible with Chatgpt) but the prompts were

If a clock had 13 hours, what would be the angle between two of these 13 hours?

Generate an image of such a clock

No, I want the clock to have 13 distinct hours, with the angle between them as you calculated above

This is the same image. There need to be 13 hour marks around the dial, evenly spaced

... And its last answer was

You are absolutely right, my apologies. It seems I made an error and generated the same image again. I will correct that immediately.

Here is an image of a clock face with 13 distinct hour marks, evenly spaced around the dial, reflecting the angle we calculated.

And the very same clock, with 12 hours, and a 13th above the 12...

ryandrake•12m ago
This is probably my biggest problem with AI tools, having played around with them more lately.

"You're absolutely right! I made a mistake. I have now comprehensively solved this problem. Here is the corrected output: [totally incorrect output]."

None of them ever seem to have the ability to say "I cannot seem to do this" or "I am uncertain if this is correct, confidence level 25%" The only time they will give up or refuse to do something is when they are deliberately programmed to censor for often dubious "AI safety" reasons. All other times, they come back again and again with extreme confidence as they totally produce garbage output.

deathanatos•13m ago

  Generate an image of a clock face, but instead of the usual 12 hour numbering, number it with 13 hours. 

Gemini, 2.5 Flash or "Nano Banana" or whatever we're calling it these days. https://imgur.com/a/1sSeFX7

A normal (ish) 12h clock. It numbered it twice, in two concentric rings. The outer ring is normal, but the inner ring numbers the 4th hour as "IIII" (fine, and a thing that clocks do) and the 8th hour as "VIIII" (wtf).

abathologist•45m ago
This is great. If you think that the phenomena of human-like text generation evinces human-like intelligence, then this should be taken to evince that the systems likely have dementia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Cognitive_Assessment
AIorNot•38m ago
Imagine if I asked you to draw as pixels and operate a clock via html or create a jpeg with a pencil and paper and have it be accurate.. I suspect your handcoded work to be off by an order of magnitutde compared
jonplackett•45m ago
kimi is kicking ass
busymom0•45m ago
Because a new clock is generated every minute, looks like simply changing the time by a digit causes the result to be significantly different from the previous iteration.
shevy-java•42m ago
Now that is actually creative.

Granted, it is not a clock - but it could be art. It looks like a Picasso. When he was drunk. And took some LSD.

kburman•41m ago
These types of tests are fundamentally flawed. I was able to create perfect clock using gemini 2.5 pro - https://gemini.google.com/share/136f07a0fa78
sinak•40m ago
How are they flawed?
earthnail•38m ago
The results are not reproducable, as evidenced by parent poster.
micromacrofoot•30m ago
isn't that kind of the point of non-determinism?
jmdeon•36m ago
Aren't they attempting to also display current time though? Your share is a clock starting at midnight/noon. Kimi K2 seems to be the best on each refresh.
Drew_•32m ago
The website is regenerating the clocks every minute. When I opened it, Gemini 2.5 was the only working one. Now, they are all broken.

Also, your example is not showing the current time.

system2•16m ago
It wouldn't be hard to tell to pick up browser time as the default start point. Just a piece of prompt.
allenu•31m ago
I don't think this is a serious test. It's just an art piece to contrast different LLMs taking on the same task, and against themselves since it updates every minute. One minute one of the results was really good for me and the next minute it was very, very bad.
dwringer•28m ago
Even Gemini Flash did really well for me[0] using two prompts - the initial query and one to fix the only error I could identify.

> Please generate an analog clock widget, synchronized to actual system time, with hands that update in real time and a second hand that ticks at least once per second. Make sure all the hour markings are visible and put some effort into making a modern, stylish clock face.

Followed by:

> Currently the hands are working perfectly but they're translated incorrectly making then uncentered. Can you ensure that each one is translated to the correct position on the clock face?

[0] https://aistudio.google.com/app/prompts?state=%7B%22ids%22:%...

lxe•40m ago
Honestly, I think if you track the performance of each over time, since these get regenerated once in a while, you can then have a very, very useful and cohesive benchmark.
1yvino•39m ago
i wonder kwen prompt woud look like hallucination?
fschuett•35m ago
Reminds me of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGbhJjXl9Rk
S0y•35m ago
To be fair, This is a deceptively hard task.
bobbylarrybobby•31m ago
Without AI assistance, this should take ~10–15 minutes for a human. Maybe add 5 minutes if you're not allowed to use d3.
alexmorley•18m ago
It's just html/css so no js at all let alone d3.
zkmon•33m ago
Was Claude banned from this Olympics?
collimarco•33m ago
In any case those clocks are all extremely inaccurate, even if AI could build a decent UI (which is not the case).

Some months ago I published this site for fun: https://timeutc.com There's a lot of code involved to make it precise to the ms, including adjusting based on network delay, frame refresh rate instead of using setTimeout and much more. If you are curious take a look at the source code.

mstipetic•31m ago
GPT-5 is embarrassing itself. Kimi and DeepSeek are very consistently good. Wild that you can just download these models.
shubham_zingle•31m ago
not sure about the accuracy though, although shooting in the dark
awkwam•21m ago
Limiting the model to only use 2000 tokens while also asking it to output ONLY HTML/CSS is just stupid. It's like asking a programmer to perform the same task while removing half their brain and also forget about their programming experience. This is a stupid and meaningless benchmark.
system2•18m ago
Ask Claude or ChatGPT to write it in Python, and you will see what they are capable of. HTML + CSS has never been the strong suit of any of these models.
munro•7m ago
Amazing, some people are so enamored with LLMs who use them for soft outcomes, and disagree with me when I say be careful they're not perfect -- this is such a great non technical way to explain the reality I'm seeing when using on hard outcome coding/logic tasks. "Hey this test is failing", LLM deletes test, "FIXED!"
novemp•4m ago
Oh cool, it's the schizophrenia clock-drawing test but for AI.

The New 2025 OWASP Top Ten

https://owasp.org/Top10/2025/0x00_2025-Introduction/
1•shehackspurple•1m ago•0 comments

All Praise to the Lunch Ladies

https://bittersoutherner.com/issue-no-12/all-praise-to-the-lunch-ladies
1•gmays•3m ago•0 comments

What's the difference between an artist and a creator?

https://www.ystrickler.com/whats-the-difference-between-an-artist-and-a-creator/
1•NaOH•3m ago•0 comments

Dredger-IoT: Ruby at the Edge – Open-Source Industrial Telemetry

https://dominickm.com/dredger-iot-ruby-at-the-edge-open-source-industrial-telemetry/
1•Kerrick•4m ago•0 comments

Why Your Audiobook Habit Might Be Sabotaging Deep Learning

https://zoia.org/posts/why-your-audiobook-habit-might-be-sabotaging-deep-learning/
1•freediver•5m ago•0 comments

I wont work for Google,Twitter, or Facebook (meta)

https://naildrivin5.com/blog/2011/08/01/why-i-wont-work-for-google-twitter-facebook.html
2•dzonga•6m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Ouverture.py – Content-addressed storage for multilingual functions

https://github.com/amirouche/ouverture.py
1•amirouche•9m ago•0 comments

Upwork warned me to stop using browser extensions

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/upwork-search-enhancement/pgpkjpoepjjbamidgffmedelnpiiinkk
2•riamuu•10m ago•1 comments

Better pre-commit, re-engineered in Rust

https://prek.j178.dev/
1•nikolay•12m ago•1 comments

The Push for Better Evidence on Microplastics and Health

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/push-better-evidence-microplastics-and-health-2025a1000vbd
1•wjb3•13m ago•0 comments

An Italian Company Builds the First Known Propellantless Space-Propulsion System

https://www.satcom.digital/news/genergo-an-italian-company-builds-the-worlds-first-known-propella...
1•maremmano•15m ago•0 comments

"Learning how to learn" via distance running

https://the-nerve-blog.ghost.io/learning-from-running/
1•mprast•15m ago•0 comments

The Orgasm Cure

https://aeon.co/essays/delayed-orgasm-the-sexual-technique-thats-better-than-sex
2•Eridanus2•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Four Solutions to Valid Parenthesis (LeetCode #20)

https://medium.com/@mcsimpson/solving-leetcode-0020-valid-parentheses-in-four-different-ways-bf3c...
1•smatthewaf•17m ago•0 comments

Hermes – A self-hosted video downloader for 1000 sites

https://github.com/TechSquidTV/Hermes
2•handystudio•17m ago•1 comments

'GoldenEye' at 30

https://variety.com/2025/film/news/goldeneye-at-thirty-1236581765/
1•birriel•18m ago•0 comments

Is the Gut-Autism Hypothesis a 'Dead End'?

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/gut-autism-hypothesis-dead-end-2025a1000vjo
1•wjb3•18m ago•1 comments

Keeplinker – 1-click link saving with drag-drop collections and public sharing

https://keeplinker.com/
2•intotheabyss999•20m ago•0 comments

A Rigorous Approach to the Algorithmic Composition of Iannis Xenakis(2009) [pdf]

https://monoskop.org/images/3/38/Hoffmann_Peter_Music_Out_of_Nothing_A_Rigorous_Approach_to_Algor...
1•ofalkaed•22m ago•0 comments

StutterZero: Speech Conversion for Stuttering Transcription and Correction

https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18938
1•internetguy•23m ago•0 comments

Lessons introductory to the modern higher algebra (1876)

https://archive.org/details/3rdedlessonintro00salmuoft
2•nigelvr•24m ago•0 comments

Nintendo Gamecube Controller Protocol

https://www.int03.co.uk/crema/hardware/gamecube/gc-control.html
2•xeonmc•26m ago•0 comments

Kitten Space Agency pre-alpha release

https://ahwoo.com/store/KPbAA1Au/kitten-space-agency
2•tomsto•26m ago•0 comments

Raptor mini is rolling out in public preview for GitHub Copilot

https://github.blog/changelog/2025-11-10-raptor-mini-is-rolling-out-in-public-preview-for-github-...
3•nateb2022•26m ago•0 comments

Comet sends all your URLs to Perplexity servers and there's no way to stop it

https://shivankaul.com/blog/comet-privacy
1•skaul•27m ago•2 comments

HipKittens: Fast and Furious AMD Kernels

https://hazyresearch.stanford.edu/blog/2025-11-09-hk
1•mpweiher•29m ago•0 comments

Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia's founder/co-founder – Jung and Naiv: Episode 792

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uswRbWyt_pg
2•LauraMedia•30m ago•1 comments

Diabetes: The Silent Killer Across India

https://pharmeasy.in/research/diabetes
3•evanjrowley•30m ago•1 comments

Allowing Failure

https://hollisrobbinsanecdotal.substack.com/p/allowing-failure
1•HR01•30m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Open-Source GoLang SDK for Multi-Tenant Agents

https://github.com/Ingenimax/agent-sdk-go
1•tech-aguirre•31m ago•0 comments