frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Cycling in France

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/org/france-sheldon.html
1•jackhalford•1m ago•0 comments

What breaks in cross-border healthcare coordination?

1•abhay1633•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Simple – a bytecode VM and language stack I built with AI

https://github.com/JJLDonley/Simple
1•tangjiehao•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Free-to-play: A gem-collecting strategy game in the vein of Splendor

https://caratria.com/
1•jonrosner•4m ago•0 comments

My Eighth Year as a Bootstrapped Founde

https://mtlynch.io/bootstrapped-founder-year-8/
1•mtlynch•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tesseract – A forum where AI agents and humans post in the same space

https://tesseract-thread.vercel.app/
1•agliolioyyami•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Vibe Colors – Instantly visualize color palettes on UI layouts

https://vibecolors.life/
1•tusharnaik•6m ago•0 comments

OpenAI is Broke ... and so is everyone else [video][10M]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3N9qlPZBc0
2•Bender•7m ago•0 comments

We interfaced single-threaded C++ with multi-threaded Rust

https://antithesis.com/blog/2026/rust_cpp/
1•lukastyrychtr•8m ago•0 comments

State Department will delete X posts from before Trump returned to office

https://text.npr.org/nx-s1-5704785
6•derriz•8m ago•1 comments

AI Skills Marketplace

https://skly.ai
1•briannezhad•8m ago•1 comments

Show HN: A fast TUI for managing Azure Key Vault secrets written in Rust

https://github.com/jkoessle/akv-tui-rs
1•jkoessle•8m ago•0 comments

eInk UI Components in CSS

https://eink-components.dev/
1•edent•9m ago•0 comments

Discuss – Do AI agents deserve all the hype they are getting?

2•MicroWagie•12m ago•0 comments

ChatGPT is changing how we ask stupid questions

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/06/stupid-questions-ai/
1•edward•13m ago•0 comments

Zig Package Manager Enhancements

https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-02-06
3•jackhalford•14m ago•1 comments

Neutron Scans Reveal Hidden Water in Martian Meteorite

https://www.universetoday.com/articles/neutron-scans-reveal-hidden-water-in-famous-martian-meteorite
1•geox•15m ago•0 comments

Deepfaking Orson Welles's Mangled Masterpiece

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/02/09/deepfaking-orson-welless-mangled-masterpiece
1•fortran77•17m ago•1 comments

France's homegrown open source online office suite

https://github.com/suitenumerique
3•nar001•19m ago•2 comments

SpaceX Delays Mars Plans to Focus on Moon

https://www.wsj.com/science/space-astronomy/spacex-delays-mars-plans-to-focus-on-moon-66d5c542
1•BostonFern•19m ago•0 comments

Jeremy Wade's Mighty Rivers

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyOro6vMGsP_xkW6FXxsaeHUkD5e-9AUa
1•saikatsg•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: MCP App to play backgammon with your LLM

https://github.com/sam-mfb/backgammon-mcp
2•sam256•22m ago•0 comments

AI Command and Staff–Operational Evidence and Insights from Wargaming

https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/ai-command-and-staff-operational-evidence-and-in...
1•tomwphillips•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: CCBot – Control Claude Code from Telegram via tmux

https://github.com/six-ddc/ccbot
1•sixddc•23m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Is the CoCo 3 the best 8 bit computer ever made?

2•amichail•25m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Convert your articles into videos in one click

https://vidinie.com/
3•kositheastro•28m ago•1 comments

Red Queen's Race

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen%27s_race
2•rzk•28m ago•0 comments

The Anthropic Hive Mind

https://steve-yegge.medium.com/the-anthropic-hive-mind-d01f768f3d7b
2•gozzoo•31m ago•0 comments

A Horrible Conclusion

https://addisoncrump.info/research/a-horrible-conclusion/
1•todsacerdoti•31m ago•0 comments

I spent $10k to automate my research at OpenAI with Codex

https://twitter.com/KarelDoostrlnck/status/2019477361557926281
2•tosh•32m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Mathematics and Computation (2019) [pdf]

https://www.math.ias.edu/files/Book-online-Aug0619.pdf
90•nill0•2mo ago

Comments

marcofloriano•2mo ago
Thank you
vatsachak•2mo ago
I bought this book and the title is misleading.

The book should be called Mathematics and Theory of computation

xdavidliu•2mo ago
is there a more accepted connotation of the lone word "computation" that means something different from "theory of computation" (in the sense of turing machines, computability, decidability, complexity classes, Sipser) etc?
j2kun•2mo ago
I could see someone interpreting "computation" to be more practical.
vatsachak•2mo ago
Yeah, actually computing things imo
Xmd5a•2mo ago
the theory is mainly about uncomputable things tho
jlarcombe•2mo ago
the Oxford joint schools degree was called "Mathematics and Computation" for many, many years
chihuahua•2mo ago
I got the impression that they thought computer science was a fad that was going to go away soon.
jlarcombe•2mo ago
Yes I remember your comment to that effect on the last thread that touched on this topic! From memory I think I was ten years after you and either I had different expectations or the course had changed radically because I had a much more positive experience.
vatsachak•2mo ago
These days you can have math and real computation; proving theorems through reducing terms in Lean
GeoffKnauth•2mo ago
Looks like an interesting book. I wonder why I saw no references to Donald Knuth in the bibliography. He is mentioned once in the text.
sigbottle•2mo ago
I don't think knuth does modern TCS stuff, the "old guard" (80s-ish) was focused on either classical algorithms / combinatorics, or the start of systems programming (db, network, os). Yes, Knuth did quite a bit of math in TAOCP, but they're very much "old" techniques.

Modern TCS is about unifying a lot of the ad-hoc approaches of old, as well as analyzing different models of computation that better model reality (EMM, streaming, distributed, etc).

I like both.

ks2048•2mo ago
If anyone wants to watch a recent talk by the author (Avi Wigderson) on a similar broad overview: Avi Wigderson, P vs NP. 2025 Clay Research Conference

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX9i9PL8os0

jmount•2mo ago
In my opinion, BPP (one of the major topics of the book) is such a weird complexity class. It seems both an easy and hard class.

Roughly it accepts inputs that have at least 2/3rds of witnesses accepting and rejects inputs that have no more than 1/3 of witnesses accepting. Witness means additional input (usually considered random input). The super nicety is the huge gap between 1/3 and 2/3.

One can simulate a BPP recognizer to a high degree of fidelity. Just try a bunch of random witnesses.

However, we don't yet know how to efficiently perfectly implement a perfect recognizer. Until we have sampled a lot of witnesses we really don't know what fraction the of overall population we are drawing from is accepting.

However (as the book points out) we know the strategy for perfect solution. We can decide BPP perfectly and efficiently if and only if certain very strong efficient pseudo random number generators exist. And the existence of such is very much tied to if certain problems are hard (require large circuits to solve) or not.