frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

What were the first animals? The fierce sponge–jelly battle that just won't end

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00238-z
1•beardyw•57s ago•0 comments

Sidestepping Evaluation Awareness and Anticipating Misalignment

https://alignment.openai.com/prod-evals/
1•taubek•1m ago•0 comments

OldMapsOnline

https://www.oldmapsonline.org/en
1•surprisetalk•3m ago•0 comments

What It's Like to Be a Worm

https://www.asimov.press/p/sentience
1•surprisetalk•3m ago•0 comments

Don't go to physics grad school and other cautionary tales

https://scottlocklin.wordpress.com/2025/12/19/dont-go-to-physics-grad-school-and-other-cautionary...
1•surprisetalk•3m ago•0 comments

Lawyer sets new standard for abuse of AI; judge tosses case

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/randomly-quoting-ray-bradbury-did-not-save-lawyer-fro...
1•pseudolus•4m ago•0 comments

AI anxiety batters software execs, costing them combined $62B: report

https://nypost.com/2026/02/04/business/ai-anxiety-batters-software-execs-costing-them-62b-report/
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•4m ago•0 comments

Bogus Pipeline

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogus_pipeline
1•doener•5m ago•0 comments

Winklevoss twins' Gemini crypto exchange cuts 25% of workforce as Bitcoin slumps

https://nypost.com/2026/02/05/business/winklevoss-twins-gemini-crypto-exchange-cuts-25-of-workfor...
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•5m ago•0 comments

How AI Is Reshaping Human Reasoning and the Rise of Cognitive Surrender

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6097646
2•obscurette•6m ago•0 comments

Cycling in France

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/org/france-sheldon.html
1•jackhalford•7m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: What breaks in cross-border healthcare coordination?

1•abhay1633•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Simple – a bytecode VM and language stack I built with AI

https://github.com/JJLDonley/Simple
1•tangjiehao•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Free-to-play: A gem-collecting strategy game in the vein of Splendor

https://caratria.com/
1•jonrosner•11m ago•1 comments

My Eighth Year as a Bootstrapped Founde

https://mtlynch.io/bootstrapped-founder-year-8/
1•mtlynch•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tesseract – A forum where AI agents and humans post in the same space

https://tesseract-thread.vercel.app/
1•agliolioyyami•12m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Vibe Colors – Instantly visualize color palettes on UI layouts

https://vibecolors.life/
1•tusharnaik•13m ago•0 comments

OpenAI is Broke ... and so is everyone else [video][10M]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3N9qlPZBc0
2•Bender•13m ago•0 comments

We interfaced single-threaded C++ with multi-threaded Rust

https://antithesis.com/blog/2026/rust_cpp/
1•lukastyrychtr•14m ago•0 comments

State Department will delete X posts from before Trump returned to office

https://text.npr.org/nx-s1-5704785
6•derriz•14m ago•1 comments

AI Skills Marketplace

https://skly.ai
1•briannezhad•14m ago•1 comments

Show HN: A fast TUI for managing Azure Key Vault secrets written in Rust

https://github.com/jkoessle/akv-tui-rs
1•jkoessle•15m ago•0 comments

eInk UI Components in CSS

https://eink-components.dev/
1•edent•16m ago•0 comments

Discuss – Do AI agents deserve all the hype they are getting?

2•MicroWagie•18m ago•0 comments

ChatGPT is changing how we ask stupid questions

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/06/stupid-questions-ai/
1•edward•19m ago•1 comments

Zig Package Manager Enhancements

https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-02-06
3•jackhalford•21m ago•1 comments

Neutron Scans Reveal Hidden Water in Martian Meteorite

https://www.universetoday.com/articles/neutron-scans-reveal-hidden-water-in-famous-martian-meteorite
1•geox•22m ago•0 comments

Deepfaking Orson Welles's Mangled Masterpiece

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/02/09/deepfaking-orson-welless-mangled-masterpiece
1•fortran77•23m ago•1 comments

France's homegrown open source online office suite

https://github.com/suitenumerique
3•nar001•25m ago•2 comments

SpaceX Delays Mars Plans to Focus on Moon

https://www.wsj.com/science/space-astronomy/spacex-delays-mars-plans-to-focus-on-moon-66d5c542
1•BostonFern•26m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Breakthrough in antimatter production

https://home.cern/news/news/experiments/breakthrough-antimatter-production
47•doener•2mo ago

Comments

pfdietz•2mo ago
It increases the rate of production of neutral antihydrogen from antiprotons and positrons by a factor of 8. It doesn't increase the efficiency of production of antiprotons, which is the extremely inefficient, energy intensive part.
throwawayqqq11•2mo ago
The output got increased by a factor of 8, did the energy consuption increase proportionately? If not, its an efficiency gain.
tsimionescu•2mo ago
If you have a process where it takes 5MW to produce one component and 80KW to convert that component into the final product, and you increase the efficiency of the second step 8 times so it only takes 10KW, that's real and awesome, but still almost irrelevant to the overall efficiency of the process. I have no idea what the actual numbers are, just stating the general concept.
XorNot•2mo ago
Conversely efficiency is a lot less important if it unlocks capability you otherwise don't have at all.

Antimatter is a unique element: nothing else can do what it does. The game changer would be producing industrially useful amounts for further experimentation.

(Antimatter chemistry would be incredibly interesting and quite possibly a practical way to actually use antimatter - shoot the beam into a reaction or solid matrix to do interesting reactions due to the electronic properties before it annihilates).

tsimionescu•2mo ago
This article is about an efficiency gain, not about any new source of antimatter or any newly discovered property or reaction. And, getting industrial levels will require massive efficiency gains, so we're back to this discussion.
XorNot•2mo ago
It's about a production rate increase, not an efficiency gain.
SiempreViernes•2mo ago
They cut production time to a given number of anti-atoms from 10 weeks to 7 hours by improving the electron cooling, just from this fact it is a bit rich to insist the anti-proton generation is the limiting factor.

Going to the paper itself we can observe that the CERN Antiproton Decelerator can deliver 10^7 antiprotons every 2 minutes. Remembering it previously took 10 weeks to capture 10^4 anti-atoms, I hope you forgive me for not agreeing that the antiproton generation is the source of important inefficiencies.

emmavis•2mo ago
In simple terms for humanists, does that brings us closer in anyway to scifi engines?:)
Ygg2•2mo ago
No. Unless you find a chunk of antimatter or a way to break the laws of physics.
lolive•2mo ago
Isn't it the path to a yet deadlier bomb ? #alwaysLookOnTheBrightSideOfLife
GCUMstlyHarmls•2mo ago
Just be-fore you draw your terminal breath ♫
lazide•2mo ago
In all (realistic) interplanetary space travel - not to mention interstellar - the difference between the largest bomb/death ray anyone has ever experienced and a better drive, is purely a matter of where you aim it and when/how you throttle it up.

The most hilarious part of the expanse for instance is how they didn’t really use their actual drives as weapons even in CQB, which is quite a waste!

Not actually that different for rockets now, frankly, we just usually don’t operate direct nuclear fission/fusion drives right now for this very reason and our own sense of self preservation.

There certainly are plans on the drawing board!

It would take 23 grams of antimatter to produce the effect of a 1 megaton nuclear bomb, and the biggest factor stopping someone is both production of the matter itself (improving) and actual shielding technology (magnetic bottles good enough to effectively trap that much antimatter are huge and extremely energy consuming right now - much bigger than a fusion bomb of equivalent power).

Theoretically, it should be possible to store that much in a thermos bottle, however. We just need better superconductor technology.

adrianN•2mo ago
The most realistic sci-fi engines are nuclear pulse engines where you ride the shockwaves of thousands of fusion bombs to reach a few percent of the speed of light. Those we could probably build right now if we were willing to spend the money. Replacing the fusion bombs with antimatter bombs would be a nice improvement for the basic design
mr_mitm•2mo ago
Is there a way to slow down using fusion bombs? Even if you manage to bring thousands of fusion bombs with you? Sounds like this is only a sensible approach for sending probes, which will then zip by their target at huge speeds.
xavxav•2mo ago
you just need to speed up in the opposite direction by flipping around and firing bombs on the other side.
ajuc•2mo ago
Which means if we get discovered by an alien probe it will look a lot like getting on the wrong end of a nuclear war.

I remember there was a quote from some sci-fi universe that there's "no such thing as an unarmed space ship".

arethuza•2mo ago
I believe that is the "Kzinti Lesson" from Larry Niven:

"A reaction drive's efficiency as a weapon is in direct proportion to its efficiency as a drive."

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WeaponizedExhaus...

froh42•2mo ago
If you can get any kind of spaceship up to speeds to reach other stars within reasonable time - you've got an amazing weapon. Just ram into something at full speed. Ok, if you have enough energy to correct course to aim, only.
RangerScience•2mo ago
It’s more than twice(1) as easy to make a rocket-propelled bullet than a rocket-propelled vehicle!

1) It’d be exactly twice as easy but for Tsiolkovsky!

nrhrjrjrjtntbt•2mo ago
How do you do that and not die?
ajuc•2mo ago
Long stick and radiation shield between you and the bombs
emmavis•2mo ago
Thanks for explanation!
gpderetta•2mo ago
I think the more "practical" idea is to replace the fission stage of a fusion bomb with antimatter annihilation.
gpderetta•2mo ago
i.e.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter-catalyzed_nuclear_p..., although it doesn't really replace the primary, just decreases the required quantity.
NooneAtAll3•2mo ago
it brings us 1 order of magnitude closer

10 more to go!

aeve890•2mo ago
What are the civilian applications?
secult•2mo ago
PET scan (You have to wait for civic applications of the newly discovered technologies for a while, but the "technology transfer" from CERN to practical applications has a few notable examples.)
joelthelion•2mo ago
PET doesn't use antimatter, at least it doesn't use it directly. It uses regular radioactive tracers.
Romain_Winler•2mo ago
PET stands for Positron Emission Tomography. The radioactive tracers emit positrons (antimatter), which then annihilate with electrons to produce the gamma rays that are detected. So it does use antimatter, just indirectly through the decay process.
joelthelion•2mo ago
I am familiar with PET. As we both agree, PET does not use antimatter directly, so this article is irrelevant to it (which is what the original comment was asking about).
secult•2mo ago
Indeed, it would be quite difficult to smuggle some antimatter to a tumor. I'm saying that research in this particular area eventually led to practical application, PET scans.
ben_w•2mo ago
Quite difficult, but also already in experiment: https://home.cern/science/experiments/ace
contravariant•2mo ago
None for the foreseeable future I hope.
fragmede•2mo ago
Why is that? I must have missed the episode of black mirror you watched that would make that a bad thing.
contravariant•2mo ago
Well what is the most obvious application of a highly volatile energy dense substance?

This substance can basically only do two things.

1) whatever ordinary hydrogen can

2) explode violently on contact with matter

Sure it's interesting to test 1) from a physics research point of view, but 2) is the only practical application that I know of.

Hendrikto•2mo ago
Propulsion with antimatter drives is another application. That’s not consumer-facing though.
fragmede•2mo ago
As a luddite, when I get in to my car to drive to work, I harness the power of several hundred violent explosions per minute in order for my non-science fiction car to get to work. If I had a homelab sized source of anti-matter violent explosions, youtube university in this hypothetical universe could help me harness it into something that generates electricity or something fun and useful, and not for killing people.
ben_w•2mo ago
If your car suffers a catastrophic exothermic event with its fuel, that looks like a car fire.

If the same energy explodes as antimatter, to the extent that it is not radiation shielded what you get is a pulse of high-energy ionising radiation*; while to the extent that it is radiation shielded, it looks like order-of as many kg of TNT as the number of kWh stored, give or take.

* with a note that 10 joules of absorbed energy per kg of body mass is "if you're lucky you will fall into a coma and die in about a week, if you're unlucky you'll be conscious", and that 1 litre of ICE fuel ~= 10 kWh = 36 megajoules.

ben_w•2mo ago
Antimatter is more of a Star Trek (and Revelation Space and a few others) issue than a Black Mirror episode.

I am far from a domain expert, I only know of four current and speculated uses for antimatter: energy storage, inducing nuclear reactions, medical imaging, and one specific tumour removal method.

For the first one, antimatter has about 1000x the energy density of fission, but also unlike a fission bomb all of it reacts (with an equal mass of normal matter), which means 1 gram of the stuff is a bigger boom than Fat Man and Little Boy combined.

Fortunately, "15000 antihydrogen atoms" is a factor of 4e19 away from 1 gram, and even if it wasn't we'd probably have to fuse the antihydrogen into antilithium to hold that much in a not completely absurd storage system.

Inducing nuclear reactions might make for some interesting propulsion systems, or might make atomic weapon proliferation even harder to prevent; that's expected at around 10^18 (the microgram level), which is still 1e14 more than announced by CERN — if it works, this use is hypothetical because current production is so much less than that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter-catalyzed_nuclear_p...

Medical imaging is already done with positron sources (doesn't need complete antihydrogen atoms), and antiproton beam therapy doesn't need the antiprotons to be turned into antihydrogen at any point: https://home.cern/science/experiments/ace etc.

SiempreViernes•2mo ago
Performing precision tests of fundamental physics by verifying that antimatter behaves as predicted by standard theory.
gostsamo•2mo ago
if produced in BIG enough quantities, very small reactors. As far as AM cannot be mined, but only produced at high price, currently it would matter only for deep space and bombs where we have RTG-s for deep space.
gradschool•2mo ago
That cloud of laser-cooled beryllium ions would probably be great for overclocking.
ReptileMan•2mo ago
Slow annihilating weapons that boil water that goes trough turbines.
nubinetwork•2mo ago
And what do we do with it? This isn't star trek, I can't just go shove this into my warp drive and blast off... /shrug
alansaber•2mo ago
These intermediate steps are important to the development of new technologies
thot_experiment•2mo ago
Now we can make a firecracker's worth of antimatter (by annihilation energy) in a mere two hundred thousand years of continuous production. Super cool stuff though, pun intended.
bogdanos•2mo ago
I just finished Angels and Demons ffs
hakkikonu•2mo ago
Nature article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-65085-4