I would make an exception for basic protocols not associated with a single company or revenue stream, like IRC, though for educational reasons.
Have you considered what would happen if others did the same thing to you?
Ad hominem through the back door coupled with missing the point entirely.
"Any negative sentiment" is very different from legislation and enforcement armed with machine guns and grenades.
Then, what is "social media"? It could be anything at all and it's likely to be defined as anything the king doesn't like, because... what else?
> I would make an exception for basic protocols
Once you are "extremely in favor of blocking young people" nobody would ask you about your subtle nuances, that's a given. I would suggest expressing only extremely cautious optimism because you obviously don't understand what kind of forces are involved here.
The kind of forces that want to see fewer teenage girls attempt suicide?
p-e-w•2mo ago
And after two decades of watching this authoritarian and paternalistic process unfold, I’m still unable to point to a single aspect of society that has been improved by it in any way.