frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

I replaced the front page with AI slop and honestly it's an improvement

https://slop-news.pages.dev/slop-news
1•keepamovin•3m ago•1 comments

Economists vs. Technologists on AI

https://ideasindevelopment.substack.com/p/economists-vs-technologists-on-ai
1•econlmics•5m ago•0 comments

Life at the Edge

https://asadk.com/p/edge
1•tosh•11m ago•0 comments

RISC-V Vector Primer

https://github.com/simplex-micro/riscv-vector-primer/blob/main/index.md
2•oxxoxoxooo•14m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Invoxo – Invoicing with automatic EU VAT for cross-border services

2•InvoxoEU•15m ago•0 comments

A Tale of Two Standards, POSIX and Win32 (2005)

https://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2.html
2•goranmoomin•19m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is the Downfall of SaaS Started?

3•throwaw12•20m ago•0 comments

Flirt: The Native Backend

https://blog.buenzli.dev/flirt-native-backend/
2•senekor•21m ago•0 comments

OpenAI's Latest Platform Targets Enterprise Customers

https://aibusiness.com/agentic-ai/openai-s-latest-platform-targets-enterprise-customers
1•myk-e•24m ago•0 comments

Goldman Sachs taps Anthropic's Claude to automate accounting, compliance roles

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/anthropic-goldman-sachs-ai-model-accounting.html
2•myk-e•26m ago•4 comments

Ai.com bought by Crypto.com founder for $70M in biggest-ever website name deal

https://www.ft.com/content/83488628-8dfd-4060-a7b0-71b1bb012785
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•27m ago•1 comments

Big Tech's AI Push Is Costing More Than the Moon Landing

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-spending-tech-companies-compared-02b90046
3•1vuio0pswjnm7•29m ago•0 comments

The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/07/ai-spending-economy-shortages/
2•1vuio0pswjnm7•31m ago•0 comments

Suno, AI Music, and the Bad Future [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8dcFhF0Dlk
1•askl•33m ago•2 comments

Ask HN: How are researchers using AlphaFold in 2026?

1•jocho12•36m ago•0 comments

Running the "Reflections on Trusting Trust" Compiler

https://spawn-queue.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3786614
1•devooops•41m ago•0 comments

Watermark API – $0.01/image, 10x cheaper than Cloudinary

https://api-production-caa8.up.railway.app/docs
1•lembergs•42m ago•1 comments

Now send your marketing campaigns directly from ChatGPT

https://www.mail-o-mail.com/
1•avallark•46m ago•1 comments

Queueing Theory v2: DORA metrics, queue-of-queues, chi-alpha-beta-sigma notation

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/queueing-theory
1•jph•58m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Hibana – choreography-first protocol safety for Rust

https://hibanaworks.dev/
5•o8vm•1h ago•1 comments

Haniri: A live autonomous world where AI agents survive or collapse

https://www.haniri.com
1•donangrey•1h ago•1 comments

GPT-5.3-Codex System Card [pdf]

https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/23eca107-a9b1-4d2c-b156-7deb4fbc697c/GPT-5-3-Codex-System-Card-02.pdf
1•tosh•1h ago•0 comments

Atlas: Manage your database schema as code

https://github.com/ariga/atlas
1•quectophoton•1h ago•0 comments

Geist Pixel

https://vercel.com/blog/introducing-geist-pixel
2•helloplanets•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: MCP to get latest dependency package and tool versions

https://github.com/MShekow/package-version-check-mcp
1•mshekow•1h ago•0 comments

The better you get at something, the harder it becomes to do

https://seekingtrust.substack.com/p/improving-at-writing-made-me-almost
2•FinnLobsien•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: WP Float – Archive WordPress blogs to free static hosting

https://wpfloat.netlify.app/
1•zizoulegrande•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: I Hacked My Family's Meal Planning with an App

https://mealjar.app
1•melvinzammit•1h ago•0 comments

Sony BMG copy protection rootkit scandal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootkit_scandal
2•basilikum•1h ago•0 comments

The Future of Systems

https://novlabs.ai/mission/
2•tekbog•1h ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

The most male and female reasons to end up hospital

https://leobenedictus.substack.com/p/the-most-male-and-female-reasons
86•speckx•2mo ago

Comments

blakesterz•2mo ago
There's also a follow up that has full data in a spreadsheet like thing:

https://leobenedictus.substack.com/p/that-hospital-admission...

hvb2•2mo ago
So to summarize...

Men, stop riding motorcycles Women, stop having kids

That last one might have some detrimental effects long term though.

So while men are taking risks, women take one for the team

basisword•2mo ago
>> So while men are taking risks, women take one for the team

I know you're joking but three of the top four are basically 'work related'. Men taking one for the team doing all the dangerous jobs.

And maybe if the men stop riding motorcycles the women will stop getting plastic surgery which is also shockingly high as a reason to end up in hospital.

zamadatix•2mo ago
This is probably the wrong chart for the comparison. The entire top section involves fewer total people than 3 separate 100% women related items on the bottom.

The follow-up article sorted by absolute numbers is a bit better suited, and predictably a bit more bland. Births is nearly in the top 10 though.

sysguest•2mo ago
another thing: this article seems to presume "it's bad to be in hospital"

...but that's really going to mess up with general health policy (vaccination, checkup-visits, etc)

zamadatix•2mo ago
These things wouldn't be classified as hospital admissions.
mitthrowaway2•2mo ago
"Supervision of normal pregnancy" seems to fall into this category, doesn't it?
zamadatix•2mo ago
And herein lies the joys of medical coding :). Likely more than 235k normal pregnancy checkups happening in hospitals over 3 years in the UK, these "Z34" codes will likely get coded as admissions if someone is admitted for concerns around the pregnancy and the net result is everything with the pregnancy ended up fine. Maybe some other oddball scenarios I'm not thinking of too, but if you just go in for a planned pregnancy checkup and it comes out fine it (shouldn't) be coded as an admission just because it was done in a hospital location. Unless the NHS just has really odd coding practices, which is possible, but the other chart isn't drowning in 10s and 10s of millions of vaccinations of each type either.

For similar reasons you may find a ton of other things which aren't normally an admission in the data, but at numbers less than one might expect because that alone isn't usually reason to admit.

I'm glad I got out of healthcare IT!

jeremyjh•2mo ago
I'm a little bit confused about what that is. If you are admitted to hospital for pregnancy and its not delivery (thats a different category that is far larger in absolute numbers) then something has gone wrong.
novok•2mo ago
There are other regular checkup stuff that does end up there depending on how it's filed. Heart imaging, mammograms, colonoscopies, etc.
Zababa•2mo ago
Quoting the article:

>I’m having to choose my words carefully, because I need to stress one thing: these are not the most common reasons for men and women to be admitted to hospital. They are the most typically male and typically female.

If you go to https://leobenedictus.substack.com/p/that-hospital-admission... and sort by number of admissions, you get stuff like:

- Personal history of certain other diseases

- Personal history of medical treatment

- Personal history of allergy to drugs, medicaments and biological substances

- Personal history of other diseases and conditions

bigstrat2003•2mo ago
The article is careful to point out that these are not the most common reasons men/women wind up in the hospital. They are the reasons that have a very gendered split as to who experiences them. So even if men stopped riding motorcycles, there would not necessarily be a noticeable decrease in male hospitalization rates.
m463•2mo ago
or conversely, if women would get up on that scaffolding and help out their man, that would disappear from the list.
NaomiLehman•2mo ago
because both would fall? :>
tshaddox•2mo ago
Also worth noting that it is only looking at percentages. If you rendered the size of the blue and red bars based on total admissions, all you'd see is a bunch of red until you zoomed in very closely.
knallfrosch•2mo ago
What a ridiculously sexist thing to even dare say out loud. The most male-dominated category is "fall from scaffolding." Men aren't up there for fun.

They built the roof that shelters you and your family when it storms.

steego•2mo ago
Aren’t we being a little sensitive?

The OP didn’t say all of the reasons for male related injuries were needless, but if you look at the list, it’s dominated by activities that are inherently voluntary and risky.

luqtas•2mo ago
aren't you being a little naive by calling dangerous activities men have to take to survive "inherently voluntary"? go to a 3° world country or works as an immigrant somewhere rich to check your options. transportation included. it's easy to say one shouldn't use a cheap motorcycle and go for the one way sardine packed 2 hours bus ride across the city to reach work, everyday
oskarkk•2mo ago
Only 3 out of 18 reasons on that list are work-related, 2 maybe can be work related (lawnmowing and powered tools/household machinery?). I think cycling accidents (5 positions on the list) are in part normal cycling (like when riding to work) without rider's fault, and in a larger part taking unnecessary risks while riding, or riding for sport. And I'd guess motorcycle accidents (4 on the list) are mostly taking risks and riding too fast. 3 reasons are "assault". And that leaves only 1 reason from the list, sports equipment.

So out of 18 reasons on the list, only a small part is "activities men have to take to survive", but many of the others aren't "inherently voluntary and risky" or cannot be blamed on the hospitalized person. The list is too short to be really interesting, when half of that list is the same thing with small variations (cycling/motorcycling), and the same for women (mostly pregnancy).

steego•2mo ago
This data reflects the UK, not a 3rd world country and my comments are restricted to this dataset.

Included in that same dataset are assaults and sports related injuries, which are additional risky activities.

You might argue assaults aren’t voluntary. My personal experience suggests most assaults are the result of voluntary activity rather than involuntary activity, YMMV.

I’m not being naive. I have lived in a 3rd world country where it wasn’t uncommon to see a family of 5 on a motorcycle.

I would note that you will tend to see, proportionately speaking, more women on motorcycles in those countries for the reasons you suggested.

belorn•2mo ago
The pregnancy numbers are a policy and not related to accidents. It would be similar to say that children at age 3, 5 and 12 months are much more likely to end up in the hospital than other age groups, since those are the ages when they get vaccinations.

As with all statistics, there is some apple to oranges comparisons and some contexts that get lost.

Ancapistani•2mo ago
Surely "admissions" does not include scheduled doctor's appointments?
belorn•2mo ago
Based on the data it seem it does.

"HES contains records of all admissions, appointments and attendances at NHS-commissioned hospital services in England."

One could limit the data to accidents and illnesses. Outcome of pregnancy would then not qualify unless there were complications.

ho_schi•2mo ago
Dear Females, are males riding bicycles wrong?

Thanks

PS: Female and male riders had this year nasty crashes in our club :(

decimalenough•2mo ago
At least in my neck of the woods, road cyclists skew heavily male, I'd guesstimate 90%. Probably even higher for occupations like UberEats/Doordash, which spend all day biking and are thus more at risk of ending up in the hospital.

Update: looked up some stats/surveys, apparently cycling skews 75-80% male.

Scubabear68•2mo ago
In the United States, males are known to be as stupid as a box of rocks when it comes to any sort of moving vehicle.

Male cyclists are much more prone to be doing 40mph wheelies down a blind hill in the middle of the road than woman.

Don't get me started on motorcycles, PA is just next store (we are over the border in NJ). PA doesn't require helmets for motorcycle riders, and many male riders happily throw helmets to the wind. The level of stupidity there is astronomical.

Spooky23•2mo ago
The helmet less riders are less likely to go the hospital, because if anything happens they are dead.
mmmlinux•2mo ago
I assume more men mountain bike than women.
mlmonkey•2mo ago
WTF is "Procreative Management" ?
janice1999•2mo ago
IVF / Fertility services
gred•2mo ago
Women: surgery to extract eggs

Men: wanking into a tube

PessimalDecimal•2mo ago
A Dixie cup probably
kevinmgranger•2mo ago
I'm starting to think the person who handed me a bread bowl for this wasn't a doctor.
odie5533•2mo ago
Wouldn't men show up a little bit more on the chart? I wonder if it's something more specific to women than just IVF.
throwway120385•2mo ago
IVF-adjacent treatments, most likely.
mlmonkey•2mo ago
Edit: I didn't mean any offense. I just didn't know what it meant!
atonse•2mo ago
Sooo does this mean that pregnant women definitely should not be doing roofing work or riding motorcycles?

Would that make them the humans most likely to go to a hospital?

shellfishgene•2mo ago
No, the list is of the most gender biased causes, others are much more common.
Sharlin•2mo ago
No. As the author tries to make clear, these are not the most common causes to go to a hospital. They are the causes, however unlikely, that show the most gender bias. That is, if the sample had one single data point of some very uncommon cause, it would show up on the list as either 100% male or 100% female.

Also, probabilities don't work like that.

inhumantsar•2mo ago
others pointed out the flaw in your interpretation but at the same time, being pregnant while roofing or riding does seem like a bad idea
atonse•2mo ago
(This comment was made in jest, not a serious comment)
rco8786•2mo ago
So basically never ride a motorcycle or a bike on the road.
lukebechtel•2mo ago
who are these 2% of men who were hospitalized due to obstetrics or gynaecological devices?
polishdude20•2mo ago
Penis implant?
callumgare•2mo ago
Trans people exist
GaryBluto•2mo ago
AFAIK the terms "male" and "female" are used to refer to sex, not gender identity by the NHS.
Dylan16807•2mo ago
2% seems like too much for that.
xioxox•2mo ago
Babies?
dredmorbius•2mo ago
<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46062817>
Tabular-Iceberg•2mo ago
Who on earth are those 1.7% men who go for "obstetric and gynaecological devices"?

Are they accompanying their wives, end up fainting during the procedures, hit their heads and have to be patched up?

echelon•2mo ago
They might be trans.
cryzinger•2mo ago
That's also my guess, and specifically: if you're a trans man with a uterus, odds are high that you'd like to get it removed. Therefore hysterectomy, therefore hospital.
echelon•2mo ago
Who the hell flagged my comment?

Trans people exist and are people too.

healsdata•2mo ago
Babies. 8% of the patients under that category are Age 0

Edit: the full billing code is "Obstetric and gynaecological devices associated with adverse incidents" Billing code Y76 "describes the circumstance causing an injury, not the nature of the injury."

So injuring a baby during delivery with forceps would result in this code.

douglee650•2mo ago
Men, asymptotic to 100% factors, women absolute 100% factors.

Wondering if this is point author is trying to make?

RajT88•2mo ago
The author actually addresses that - he hadn't even considered that pregnancy related issues would top the list.

I think this was just a fun exercise for a curious mind. I don't think it needs to have a point - it's not an essay.

tonymet•2mo ago
Don’t plot rates and volumes in the same chart . A single entry is larger than nearly the remnants
nialv7•2mo ago
Some of these categories are awfully vague. "Non-treatment procedures"??
parliament32•2mo ago
I interpreted that as "a procedure that does not treat a medical condition". So, possibly various non-doctor-ordered weight-loss-related procedures, cosmetic surgery, etc.
recursivecaveat•2mo ago
The spreadsheet in the follow up post gives the slightly rephrased "Procedures for purposes other than remedying health state". I think you're right, possibly including preventative surgeries as well.

My personal favorite would be the amusingly bureaucratic "Acquired absence of organs, not elsewhere classified". I'm also curious how 14 people were admitted as "victim of volcanic eruption" in England.

joshdavham•2mo ago
> 89.5% Psychological problems [for women]

This is a pretty stunning statistic to me. I suppose if you were to ask me to guess which gender is hospitalized the most frequently for mental health reasons, I'd probably guess women... but I wouldn't expect the distribution to be that extremely skewed.

Is there a simple explanation for this?

api•2mo ago
They are more likely to seek help?

Men are over represented in prisons and the homeless population. Maybe they don’t seek help.

kimos•2mo ago
Men are also over represented in suicide.
tick_tock_tick•2mo ago
1 in 4 Women are on antidepressant by age 50.

It's a silent epidemic when you look at mental health rates and it appear to be getting worse.

tmsh•2mo ago
“In which some stereotypes are resoundingly confirmed” - so the post is confirming stereotypes of differences between women and men by highlighting the extremes in difference (not the actual counts)? It’s misleading. The gender differences are less stark if you use better charts and don’t include activities that men literally can’t do (that’s not a “stereotype” that’s human anatomy).
Fire-Dragon-DoL•2mo ago
Given the 100% on things that can only happen to female bodies, I'm surprised there is no counterpart for stuff that can happen only to the male body, like torsion of testicles. Maybe there is no dedicated code for that?