Why?
> social media is full of foreign influence campaigns.
And local influence campaigns.
Which social media campaign gave RFK a brain worm in 2010?
Trump has basically been Trumpy for 40+ years: https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1ityrsu/1987_fullpage...
There aren't a ton of things that can be explained by malice but cannot possibly be explained by stupidity. This becomes a thought terminating cliche really fast.
Impacting our ability to borrow money/causing inflation are the strongest non-military weapons that can be used against the US, in my opinion.
An explicit policy of this administration is to decrease the value of the US dollar. And while monetary inflation does somewhat influence other countries' willingness to loan money (ie buy Treasuries), isolating us from our allies and demonstrating general instability are also quite fundamental to that.
They don't need to do that. They are defunding and demonizing those and instead taking over TikTok, CBS, CNN... X and WaPo already taken over by colluders. Oh, and the cabinet is all Fox News people.
I don't see why. If they were not planning on taking over the place long term, then they'd want to decrease state capacity not increase it. ( Furthermore in the US, corporate media conglomerates make up most of what we'd traditionally consider state run media )
> reduce the right to keep and bear arms
Why exactly? In this context, small arms mainly just give the population more tools to harm each other as the place falls apart.
> increase regulation and taxes to damage domestic industrial capacity and reduce competitiveness
Regulation has been increasing for decades. But even overbearing regulations are a downright level playing field for innovation compared with having to bribe the administration (with money and political prostration) to avoid becoming the target of capricious attacks under the color of law.
> invest $100B into TSMC Arizona or push Japanese car manufacturers and European pharmaceutical companies to build domestically
These are beneficial, but it feels like we're back up against the limits of continuity and showmanship. Complete repudiation of constructive investment (eg CHIPS Act) would raise eyebrows. And a few big state-directed investments here and there aren't going to reverse the tariff assault on our distributed industry. Furthermore unless the economic bargaining power of workers drastically changes for the better, foreign-owned factories in the US are still going to result in most of their generated wealth leaving the US. And without that, the main benefit of domestic factories (nationalization in a time of need) is fundamentally abhorrent to the US political environment no matter who is in power.
robthebrew•2mo ago
op00to•2mo ago
Ho ho, some of us still have passports and could be coming to a country near YOU! cough cough