It’s true that the POTUS is subject to the US courts. But I think it is fair to read TFA as a lament about an unwise assumption that is broader than “Biden wouldn’t have done certain things.” The organs of the EU should protect EU interests as if no nonEU organ ever agreed by default with the EU’s values.

You might want to follow the article and wake up to the slow destruction of the US's constitutional architecture.

How can you seriously claim the president has no control over the court when he previously appointed three judges, with three more having been appointed by other presidents from his party? Appointments which made the court reverse decades-old case law?