frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Michael Burry Speaks [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsE13fvjz18
1•avonmach•1m ago•0 comments

Why Sourcegraph and Amp Are Becoming Independent Companies

https://sourcegraph.com/blog/why-sourcegraph-and-amp-are-becoming-independent-companies
2•janpio•2m ago•0 comments

O'Saasy License Agreement

https://www.fizzy.do/license
1•hahahacorn•4m ago•0 comments

Bending Spoons Acquires Eventbrite

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251202408560/en/Eventbrite-Enters-into-Definitive-Agreem...
3•crivabene•4m ago•0 comments

The Enshittification of Plex Is Kicking Off, Starting with Free Roku Users

https://gizmodo.com/the-enshittification-of-plex-is-kicking-off-starting-with-free-roku-users-200...
1•Bender•4m ago•0 comments

Eventbrite to go private in a $500M deal

https://seekingalpha.com/news/4527545-ticketing-platform-eventbrite-to-go-private-in-a-500m-deal-...
2•ewf•4m ago•0 comments

Google Antigravity vibe-codes user's drive out of existence

https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/01/google_antigravity_wipes_d_drive/
1•Bender•5m ago•1 comments

Amp, Inc. – Amp is spinning out of Sourcegraph

https://ampcode.com/news/amp-inc
9•pdubroy•6m ago•0 comments

Pwning OpenAI Atlas Through Exposed Browser Internals

https://www.hacktron.ai/blog/hacking-openai-atlas-browser
1•bearsyankees•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Validation system eliminates 90% of AI code failures (97.8% accuracy)

https://transformationagents.ai/webinar
1•buttersmoothAI•8m ago•0 comments

I Fed Claude 7 Years of Daily Journals. It Showed Me the Future of AI

https://medium.com/swlh/i-fed-claude-7-years-of-daily-journals-it-showed-me-the-future-of-ai-2c13...
1•Franz23•9m ago•0 comments

Just Use Postgres

https://www.manning.com/books/just-use-postgres
1•agentdrek•10m ago•1 comments

Sam Altman Declares 'Code Red' as Google's Gemini Surges

https://fortune.com/2025/12/02/sam-altman-declares-code-red-google-gemini-ceo-sundar-pichai/
3•tantalor•10m ago•2 comments

Churches withdraw investments from fossil fuels

https://dpa-international.com/politics/urn:newsml:dpa.com:20090101:251118-99-672846/
2•amai•11m ago•0 comments

Study: How Social media use impacts teen body image

https://twin-cities.umn.edu/news-events/how-social-media-use-impacts-teen-body-image
1•giuliomagnifico•13m ago•0 comments

Two paths to Enlightenment: AV Linux 25 and MX Moksha step forward

https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/02/av_linux_25/
1•Bender•16m ago•0 comments

Why Distributed Teams Need Uniform Headshots for Trust and Cohesion

https://www.aiheadshotreviews.com/articles/remote-team-headshots-trust-cohesion
1•naveensky•16m ago•0 comments

Let's talk about feral kids(2024)

https://www.cfabo.org/blog/lets-talk-about-feral-kids
1•rolph•18m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Saving/restoring web-app state–useful or pointless?

1•niteshnagpal•19m ago•0 comments

Show HN: JustHTML – A pure Python HTML5 parser that just works

https://github.com/EmilStenstrom/justhtml
2•EmilStenstrom•19m ago•0 comments

Garden of Eden

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_of_Eden_(cellular_automaton)
1•downboots•20m ago•0 comments

Sam Altman declares 'code red' to improve ChatGPT amid rising competition

https://apnews.com/article/openai-chatgpt-code-red-google-gemini-00d67442c7862e6663b0f07308e2a40d
2•geox•20m ago•2 comments

LLM from scratch, part 28 – training a base model from scratch on an RTX 3090

https://www.gilesthomas.com/2025/12/llm-from-scratch-28-training-a-base-model-from-scratch
1•gpjt•21m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is a non-engineer's AI co-thinking log useful to anyone?

1•ys-oh•21m ago•0 comments

Show HN: WhatDoYouDo – A subscription-free rolodex/Relationship management tool

https://whatdoyoudo.xyz/
1•yashesmaistry•22m ago•0 comments

How to Fix an Unbearably Slow iCloud Drive

https://danielmiessler.com/blog/fix-slow-icloud
1•speckx•23m ago•0 comments

Fusionauth-JWT v6.0.0 Released

https://github.com/FusionAuth/fusionauth-jwt/releases/tag/6.0.0
1•mooreds•23m ago•0 comments

The biggest AI win I've experienced

https://github.com/calebmadrigal/fuzzygraph/pull/4
1•calebm•24m ago•1 comments

30 years of SOHO staring at the sun

https://www.space.com/astronomy/sun/30-years-of-soho-staring-at-the-sun-space-photo-of-the-day-fo...
1•almosthere•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: 1T row challenge in 76s using DuckDB and 10,000 CPUs

https://docs.burla.dev/examples/process-2.4tb-in-parquet-files-in-76s
2•pancakeguy•28m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Bun is joining Anthropic

https://bun.com/blog/bun-joins-anthropic
204•ryanvogel•33m ago

Comments

ChrisArchitect•23m ago
Associated Anthropic post: https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-cla...
colesantiago•23m ago
Is Claude Code the first CLI tool to have a $1BN ARR?
CSSer•17m ago
I don't know for sure, but it's definitely the first tool of that value to have a persistent strobing (scroll position) bug so bad that passersby ask me if I'm okay when they see it.
jedixit•12m ago
This graph from the SemiAnalysis blog suggests that GitHub Copilot reached it earlier this year: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!BGEe!,f_auto,q_auto:...
simonw•11m ago
"GitHub Copilot" encompasses so many different products now that it's hard to see it as a CLI tool.
theflyinghorse•23m ago
Congratulations to the bun team!
victorbuilds•20m ago
I use Claude Code CLI daily - it's genuinely changed how I work. The $1B number sounds crazy but honestly tracks with how good the tool is. Curious how Bun integration will show up in practice beyond the native installer.
slig•19m ago
Love bun! Congratulations!
re-thc•18m ago
Congrats...

> Long-term stability. a home and resources so people can safely bet their stack on Bun.

Isn't it the opposite? Now we've tied Bun to "AI" and if the AI bubble or hype or whatever bursts or dies down it'd impact Bun.

> We had over 4 years of runway to figure out monetization. We didn't have to join Anthropic.

There's honestly a higher chance of Bun sticking out that runway than the current AI hype still being around.

Nothing against Anthropic but with the circular financing, all the debt, OpenAI's spending and over-valuations "AI" is the riskier bet than Bun and hosting.

ricopags•15m ago
I say don't muddy the water with the public panic over "will it won't it" bubble burst predictions.

The effective demand for Opus 4.5 is bottomless; the models will only get better.

People will always want a code model as good as we have now, let alone better.

Bun securing default status in the best coding model is a win-win-win

re-thc•7m ago
> I say don't muddy the water with the public panic over "will it won't it" bubble burst predictions.

It does matter. The public ultimately determines how much they get in funding if at all.

> The effective demand for Opus 4.5 is bottomless; the models will only get better.

The demand for the Internet is bottomless. Doesn't mean Dotcom didn't crash.

There are lots of scenarios this can play out, e.g. Anthropic fails to raise a certain round because money dried up. OpenAI buys Anthropic but decides they don't need Bun and closes out the project.

phantasmish•14m ago
Yeah, no reader of tech news will take an acquisition of a company with four years of runway as anything but decreasing the odds their product will still be around (and useful to the same audience…) in four years. Even without being tied to a company with lots of exposure to a probable bubble.
supern0va•8m ago
How so? Presumably Jarred got a nice enough payout that if Anthropic failed, he would not need to work. At that point, he's more than welcome to take the fully MIT licensed Bun and fork it to start another company or just continue to work on it himself if he so chooses.
Lermatroid•13m ago
Yeah that’s the main part that puzzled me, super happy for the team that they got a successful exit, but I wouldn’t really consider Anthropic’s situation to be stable…
jedahan•17m ago
:(
qsort•17m ago
Anthropic? The AI people?
jsheard•16m ago
Look, an AI powered terminal emulator raised $67 million. Nobody said that AI funding and acquisitions have to make any sense.
jackblemming•16m ago
The Bun team works hard, glad to see it pay off.
tkel•16m ago
Oh no ... unfortunately this likely means a Bun.AI API in my JS runtime.
afavour•15m ago
What matters: it's staying open source and MIT licensed. I sincerely hope it stays that way. Congrats to the Bun team on making a great tool and getting the recognition they deserve.

> Being part of Anthropic gives Bun: Long-term stability.

Let's see. I don't want to always be the downer but the AI industry is in a state of rapid flux with some very strong economic headwinds. I wouldn't confidently say that hitching your wagon to AI gives you long term stability. But as long as the rest of us keep the ability to fork an open source project I won't complain too much.

(for those who are disappointed: this is why you stick with Node. Deno and Bun are both VC funded projects, there's only one way that goes. The only question is timeline)

cortesoft•13m ago
Nothing gives you long term stability in tech. You have to constantly work at staying stable, and it isn't always up to anything the company is in control of, no matter what ownership they have.
afavour•9m ago
> Nothing gives you long term stability in tech.

Sure. But everything is relative. For instance, Node has much more likelihood of long term stability than Bun, given its ownership.

pelagicAustral•15m ago
Godspeed. Seems like a good pairing. Bun is sort of the only part of the JS ecosystem I like, and Code has become such an important tool for my work, that I think good things will come out of this match. Go Bundler as well.
wiseowise•15m ago
Hope nobody buys Astral or Python is f*cked.
zelphirkalt•12m ago
Then it would probably be back to Poetry. Or some other newcomer, or maybe a fork of uv.
andrewl-hn•8m ago
Honestly, given the constant rollercoaster of version management and building tools for Python the move to something else would be expected rather than surprising.

I’ve seems like a great tool, but I remember thinking the same about piping, too.

whalesalad•10m ago
Our entire business runs on Python without a drop of Astral in the mix. No one would even notice.
mrcwinn•15m ago
Congrats. This is the first time I remember reading a genuine, authentic story about a sale. Much preferred over “this is about continuing the mission until my earn-out is complete.”
jjordan•14m ago
I don't really see how Bun fits as an acquisition for an AI company. This seems more like "we have tons of capital and we want to buy something great" than "Bun is essential to our core business model".
nurumaik•13m ago
Looks like they are acquiring the team rather than the product
simonw•13m ago
No, they're clearly acquiring the technology. They're betting Claude Code on Bun, they have an invested interest in the health of Bun.
LunaSea•10m ago
Why would they want to bet on nascent technology whereas Node.js bas existed for a god 15 years?
stonogo•7m ago
Because Microsoft already owns that.
giancarlostoro•9m ago
That was my thinking is, this would be useful for Claude Code.
gkoberger•11m ago
If Anthropic wants to own code development in the future, owning the full platform (including the runtime) makes sense.

Programming languages all are a balance between performance/etc and making it easy for a human to interact with. This balance is going to shit as AI writes more code (and I assume Anthropic wants a future where humans might not even see the code, but rather an abstraction of it... after all, all code we look at is an abstraction on some level).

singularity2001•9m ago

   "the full platform"
there are more languages than ts though?

Acquisition of Apple Swift division incoming?

tomashubelbauer•6m ago
TypeScript is the most popular programming language on the most popular software hosting platform though, owning the best runtime for that seems like it would fit Pareto's rule well enough:

https://github.blog/news-insights/octoverse/octoverse-a-new-...

sankalpmukim•11m ago
Does this acquisition mean Claude Code the CLI is more valuable than entiriety of Bun?
gehsty•8m ago
It certainly generated more revenue, so this is not surprising?
re-thc•5m ago
> It certainly generated more revenue, so this is not surprising?

Anything is greater than 0

rvz•7m ago
It does actually.

Claude Code is a 1B+ cash machine and Anthropic directly uses Bun for it.

Acquiring Bun lowers the risk of the software being unmaintained as Bun made $0 and relied on VC money.

Makes sense, but this is just another day in San Francisco of a $0 revenue startup being bought out.

myth_drannon•14m ago
First major success story for Zig language? (Not trying to diminish Bun's team success)
smileson2•14m ago
Makes sense, I had idea how else the investors would have made money on a javascript bundler/jsc frontend
ymsodev•14m ago
This somewhat answers the question of "how on earth is a JS runtime company going to profit?"
iyn•13m ago
Curious about the deal value/price — any clues whether it was just to make existing investors even (so say up to $30M) or are we talking some multiple? But if it's a multiple, even 2x sounds a bit crazy.
moralestapia•13m ago
What?

Why?

tibbydudeza•13m ago
Reminds me of Atlassian buying an AI browser.
heinekan•13m ago
I’m curious to what the acquisition price was. Bun said they’ve raised $26 million so I’m assuming the price tag has to be a lot higher than that for investors to agree to an acquisition.
yanis_t•13m ago
I don't get it. Why would Anthropic need to own a JS runtime?
simonw•12m ago
Because they have a product that makes $1bn+ a year that depends on having a good, stable, cross-platform JS runtime.
LunaSea•9m ago
You're describing Node.js which has existed for the last 15 years
krashidov•8m ago
I'm still confused. Why not just pour a ton of resources into it since it's open source. I guess dev mindshare? It is a great product
sneak•6m ago
That doesn’t require or benefit from acquiring Bun. Node continues to exist and serve fine.
lvl155•6m ago
I wonder if they asked Opus if this is a good acquisition for Anthropic.
Tiberium•13m ago
As someone who have been using Deno for the last few years, is there anything that Bun does better? Bun seems to use a different runtime (JSC) which is less tested than V8, and might also perform worse in real-world tasks (maybe not anymore?). The last time I checked Bun's source code, it was... quite messy and spaghetti-like, plus Zig doesn't really offer many safety features, so it's not that hard to write incorrect code. Zig does force some safety with ReleaseSafe IIRC, but it's still not the same as even modern C++, let alone Rust.

I'll admit I'm somewhat biased against Bun, but I'm honestly interested in knowing why people prefer Bun over Deno.

ecares•11m ago
It has wayyyyy better nodejs compatibility (day 1 goal)
Tiberium•10m ago
As far as I know, modern Node compat in Deno is also quite great - I just import packages via 'npm:package' and they work, even install scripts work. Although I remember that in the past Deno's Node compat was worse, yes.
kylecarbs•12m ago
Bun has completely changed my outlook on the JS ecosystem. Prior to Bun, there was little focus on performance. Now the entire space rallies around it.

Congrats to Jarred and the team!

nailer•7m ago
One important original point of node was that v8 made JS very fast by compiling to machine code, plus it’s had multithreading built in for a decade.
renewiltord•11m ago
Hahaha congratulations. This is amazing. The most unlikely outcome for a devtools team. Fascinating stuff.

This is promising for Astral et al who I really like but worried about their sustainability. It does point to being as close to the user as possible mattering.

andrewl-hn•11m ago
I’ll be honest, while I have my doubts about the match of interests and cohesion between an AI company and a JS runtime company I have to say this is the single best acquisition announcement blog post I’ve seen in 20 years or so.

Very direct, very plain and detailed. They cover all the bases about the why, the how, and what to expect. I really appreciate it.

Best of luck to the team and hopefully the new home will support them well.

ctoth•9m ago
This decision is honestly very confusing to me as a constant user of Claude Code (I have 3 of them open at the moment.)

So many of the issues with it seem to be because ... they wrote the damn thing in JavaScript?

Claude is pretty good at a constrained task with tests -- couldn't you just port it to a different language? With Claude?

And then just ... the huge claude.json which gets written on every message, like ... SQLite exists! Please, please use it! The scrollback! The Keyboard handling! Just write a simple Rust or Go or whatever CLI app with an actual database and reasonable TUI toolkit? Why double down and buy a whole JavaScript runtime?

asim•8m ago
It's more honest than the Replicate answer but I think inevitably if you can't raise the next round and you get distracted by the shiny AI that this is the path taken by many teams. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. There was an exuberant time when all the OSS things were getting funded, and now all AI things get funded. For many engineer founders, it's a better fit to go build deep technical stuff inside a bigger company. If I had that chance I would probably have taken it too. Good luck to the Bun team!
copperroof•8m ago
Well this just created a lot of work for me. Everything’s turning to shit at an alarming rate.
kace91•7m ago
>If most new code is going to be written, tested, and deployed by AI agents

That perspective following “in two-three years” makes me shudder, honestly.

mritchie712•5m ago
> At the time of writing, Bun's monthly downloads grew 25% last month (October, 2025), passing 7.2 million monthly downloads. We had over 4 years of runway to figure out monetization. We didn't have to join Anthropic.

I believe this completely. They didn't have to join, which means they got a solid valuation.

> Instead of putting our users & community through "Bun, the VC-backed startups tries to figure out monetization" – thanks to Anthropic, we can skip that chapter entirely and focus on building the best JavaScript tooling.

I believe this a bit less. It'll be nice to not have some weird monetization shoved into bun, but their focus will likely shift a bit.