The author is really on point when they keep talking about "sport fans" analogy.
(If one day someone can come up with an experiment to tell those apart, this would be pretty exciting, and I bet they have a good shot on Nobel prize. But I am not holding my breath on that)
That's no shade on them. They had a brand-new territory with jaw-dropping implications. It's no surprise that they didn't get everything right the first time.
But when I read "Try saying that to Niels Bohr’s face!", you're citing century-old ideas as if science stopped in 1927. A lot has happened in the mean time.
mcc1ane•2mo ago