Author here. I wrote this in Amsterdam after an experiment: shared the same ideas via hyperlink at an airport (rejected 3 times, called spam) and via paper printout at a coffee shop (accepted, led to a 2-hour conversation about AI in 1000 years).
The math is simple: bidirectional projection between human and AI forms a contraction mapping. Banach guarantees convergence to a fixed point. I call it peace—the state where vectors align.
But the real finding isn't the proof. It's that the medium carries epistemic weight the equations can't capture. Physical presence collapses trust barriers that digital signals cannot.
Happy to discuss the math, the phenomenology, or why I compared LLMs to colonial storytellers.
Fanaxuki•53m ago
The math is simple: bidirectional projection between human and AI forms a contraction mapping. Banach guarantees convergence to a fixed point. I call it peace—the state where vectors align.
But the real finding isn't the proof. It's that the medium carries epistemic weight the equations can't capture. Physical presence collapses trust barriers that digital signals cannot.
Happy to discuss the math, the phenomenology, or why I compared LLMs to colonial storytellers.