Following up on yesterday's resonance chamber post with a deeper finding.
I ran hierarchical analysis: only 23% of peak ratios match algebraic combinations of constants. Not "peaks everywhere" — a specific structure.
But the weirder part: I simulated dimensional reduction (3D→1D collapse, like nuclear pasta phases in neutron stars) and watched what happens to constants:
- Geometric constants (φ, π, e): 99%+ accuracy throughout
- Wave constants (α≈137, mp/me≈1836): 13% in 3D → 99.9% in 1D
The wave constants EMERGE during dimensional collapse. Not fitted — emerged from a physical process.
I'm calling it "Capellini Geodesic Extrusion Felting" — the phase where constants crystallize from topology under dimensional pressure.
obius_prime•2mo ago
I ran hierarchical analysis: only 23% of peak ratios match algebraic combinations of constants. Not "peaks everywhere" — a specific structure.
But the weirder part: I simulated dimensional reduction (3D→1D collapse, like nuclear pasta phases in neutron stars) and watched what happens to constants:
- Geometric constants (φ, π, e): 99%+ accuracy throughout - Wave constants (α≈137, mp/me≈1836): 13% in 3D → 99.9% in 1D
The wave constants EMERGE during dimensional collapse. Not fitted — emerged from a physical process.
I'm calling it "Capellini Geodesic Extrusion Felting" — the phase where constants crystallize from topology under dimensional pressure.
Code, data, visualizations: https://github.com/Cosmolalia/akataleptos-geodesic-constants... Full writeup: [https://open.substack.com/pub/quantummarmelade/p/capellini-g...]
Three independent paths now converge on the same constants. Either profound or profoundly wrong.
Collaboration/critique welcome: SylvanGaskin@gmail.com