fp.

Are we just going to continue to ignore that Trump has no legal authority to do this? Such action requires legislation, not executive orders. Executive orders can't preempt state law.

andsoitis•2mo ago

What do you think about the rationale?

JohnFen•2mo ago

He provided no rationale for why this is something that can be done through executive order.

His argument that it's better to have a single national rule has some merit, but that's congress' job, not his.

taylodl•2mo ago

Having one national set of AI laws and guidelines rather than a patchwork of AI laws and guidelines is certainly better for the AI companies - but it's up to Congress - which has representation from all the states - to create the legislation to do so.

andsoitis•2mo ago

That tracks. How long do you think we should wait for Congress to do so, considering how long AI has now been "out there"? Another 6 months? 12 months? Indefinitely?

verdverm•2mo ago

Considering we don't have anything like the DSA or CCPA yet, I wouldn't hold my breath

taylodl•2mo ago

The president has no authority to usurp the responsibility of Congress, regardless of how slow Congress moves. This is why diplomacy and diplomatic skills matter. You can't act like a two-year old and throw tantrums and expect to get things done. Donald Trump has never learned to work within the confines of the law.

LastTrain•2mo ago

How long should we wait before we allow POTUS to act unilaterally in circumvention of the constitution?

rsynnott•2mo ago

"Congress is being slow; we should just illegally pretend to make a law" is not a _great_ argument, tbh.

techblueberry•2mo ago

Yeah, I mean, this should be interesting --

https://www.flgov.com/eog/news/press/2025/governor-ron-desan...

"Governor Ron DeSantis Announces Proposal for Citizen Bill of Rights for Artificial Intelligence"