40M. More than PubMed, which needed more than two decades to grow close to that number?
One way or the other, somebody seems to be utter clueless.
Jtsummers•23m ago
As jjgreen pointed out, the submitter made a bizarrely editorialized version of the title that multiplied the title's number, 40, by a million to get their "40M" version of the title.
jjgreen•56m ago