> Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian political ideology emphasizing extreme nationalism, a strong central government led by a dictator, suppression of opposition, militarism, and the subordination of individual rights to the state's perceived needs, often with state control of the economy and a belief in national rebirth and strength.
MAGA is fascist or at the very least fascist adjacent. If they don’t like the accuracy of the label, they should stop being authoritarian assholes.
edit grammar
also: ISIS did nothing wrong
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_beheadings
nothing to see here...
And sure, ISIS, did plenty wrong, just not one tiny bit of it in the pursuit of anything resembling fascism.
Calling Salafist/Wahhabist Islamist extremism “islamofascist” is as idiotic as calling adherents to the prosperity gospel “christotrotskyites”… it’s just a propaganda tool without discernible meaning to anyone but the (idiot) choir.
Most notably: current policies are addressed at punishing illegal immigrants, but it's clear that it's being targeted at non-white and mostly Spanish-speaking people. There are numerous incidents of people being racially profiled despite being American citizens, and no steps are being taken to minimize that. The policy is popular with those who are explicit about their racial supremacy.
If you support programs that hurt people of a different race, then calling you a "Nazi" is not inapt, regardless of what you think of the actual Nazis.
Mine don’t, I don’t like that people are being unfairly targeted if they’re citizens or have legal rights to be in the country. That said, I don’t want illegal immigrants to be harmed or mistreated. And it’s not just me, many Americans feel the same way.
The issue is more complex than simply a humanitarian cause. The effect of letting in hundreds of people is something you can balance over time, but letting in millions over a relatively short period has both economic and geopolitical ramifications. Besides that, borders exist for more than security, their permeability has implications for national sovereignty as well. For Americans who aren’t racist, the issue is multifaceted and just as important as the plight of an economic immigrant or asylum seeker.
If you look at who is entering the U.S. illegally, it includes people from strong economic powerhouses with healthy growth projections and competitive GDP, like Brazil, Mexico, China, India and so on.
When you just absorb the economic or political issues of other countries by taking in their poor, then you don’t ever let those societies reflect on what they’re doing wrong or right for their people. Countries should be responsible for their people, and if they’re unable to be that way for one reason or another, their people need to examine why and ask their leaders some tough questions. Immigrating to other countries, for jobs, safety, or education, is not a good or sustainable way of doing things, which is why we’re currently having the issues that we’re having.
I also think asylum seekers should be sent to countries that most match their cultural backgrounds, and repatriated when conflict is resolved, or sent somewhere where they have family ties. There needs to be a better way to bring normalcy into the lives of people affected by war or conflict other than turning them away, or indefinitely opening your doors to anyone who claims asylum, where there is a non-zero occurrence of fraud.
Good and responsible governance is the only way to ensure better outcomes for people. Political extremism isn’t going to enable good governance.
Which specific ramifications? It is interesting how often people stop here.
But don't you think letting people from third world countries like mine with corrupt institutions will no way harm institutions in America ?
A "corrupt institutions" bound to people from various nations?
[0] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/minnesota-fraud-spent-millions-...
(Yet another disclaimer that I am not an American or ever been to America)
And you want me to believe that this isn't bigoted garbage?
See here for why immigration can be a net positive force, https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/do-immigrants-and-immigrati...
And here https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27075/w270...
See here for why illegal immigration (everywhere, not just the U.S.) can be a destabilizing force,
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61464
https://www.irli.org/human-trafficking-is-proof-that-illegal...
https://www.unodc.org/documents/toc/factsheets/TOC12_fs_migr...
Some people don’t want to leave their homelands and are forced into it
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/Hot%20Spots/Docume...
So the issue isn’t about racism, mass migration from a country is not a healthy indication of state of affairs, and in some way countries tacitly sanction bad governance by others when they absorb the problems of others. No one should have to leave their homelands for economic or safety reasons.
nis0s•1mo ago