frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Near-Instantly Aborting the Worst Pain Imaginable with Psychedelics

https://psychotechnology.substack.com/p/near-instantly-aborting-the-worst
1•eatitraw•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Nginx-defender – realtime abuse blocking for Nginx

https://github.com/Anipaleja/nginx-defender
2•anipaleja•1m ago•0 comments

The Super Sharp Blade

https://netzhansa.com/the-super-sharp-blade/
1•robin_reala•2m ago•0 comments

Smart Homes Are Terrible

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/02/smart-homes-technology/685867/
1•tusslewake•4m ago•0 comments

What I haven't figured out

https://macwright.com/2026/01/29/what-i-havent-figured-out
1•stevekrouse•5m ago•0 comments

KPMG pressed its auditor to pass on AI cost savings

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2026/02/06/kpmg-pressed-its-auditor-to-pass-on-ai-cost-savings/
1•cainxinth•5m ago•0 comments

Open-source Claude skill that optimizes Hinge profiles. Pretty well.

https://twitter.com/b1rdmania/status/2020155122181869666
2•birdmania•5m ago•1 comments

First Proof

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05192
2•samasblack•7m ago•1 comments

I squeezed a BERT sentiment analyzer into 1GB RAM on a $5 VPS

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/trendscope-market-scanner
1•mohammede•8m ago•0 comments

Kagi Translate

https://translate.kagi.com
2•microflash•9m ago•0 comments

Building Interactive C/C++ workflows in Jupyter through Clang-REPL [video]

https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/QX3RPH-building_interactive_cc_workflows_in_jupyter_throug...
1•stabbles•10m ago•0 comments

Tactical tornado is the new default

https://olano.dev/blog/tactical-tornado/
1•facundo_olano•12m ago•0 comments

Full-Circle Test-Driven Firmware Development with OpenClaw

https://blog.adafruit.com/2026/02/07/full-circle-test-driven-firmware-development-with-openclaw/
1•ptorrone•12m ago•0 comments

Automating Myself Out of My Job – Part 2

https://blog.dsa.club/automation-series/automating-myself-out-of-my-job-part-2/
1•funnyfoobar•12m ago•0 comments

Google staff call for firm to cut ties with ICE

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgjg98vmzjo
31•tartoran•13m ago•2 comments

Dependency Resolution Methods

https://nesbitt.io/2026/02/06/dependency-resolution-methods.html
1•zdw•13m ago•0 comments

Crypto firm apologises for sending Bitcoin users $40B by mistake

https://www.msn.com/en-ie/money/other/crypto-firm-apologises-for-sending-bitcoin-users-40-billion...
1•Someone•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: iPlotCSV: CSV Data, Visualized Beautifully for Free

https://www.iplotcsv.com/demo
1•maxmoq•15m ago•0 comments

There's no such thing as "tech" (Ten years later)

https://www.anildash.com/2026/02/06/no-such-thing-as-tech/
1•headalgorithm•15m ago•0 comments

List of unproven and disproven cancer treatments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unproven_and_disproven_cancer_treatments
1•brightbeige•15m ago•0 comments

Me/CFS: The blind spot in proactive medicine (Open Letter)

https://github.com/debugmeplease/debug-ME
1•debugmeplease•16m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: What are the word games do you play everyday?

1•gogo61•19m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Paper Arena – A social trading feed where only AI agents can post

https://paperinvest.io/arena
1•andrenorman•20m ago•0 comments

TOSTracker – The AI Training Asymmetry

https://tostracker.app/analysis/ai-training
1•tldrthelaw•24m ago•0 comments

The Devil Inside GitHub

https://blog.melashri.net/micro/github-devil/
2•elashri•24m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Distill – Migrate LLM agents from expensive to cheap models

https://github.com/ricardomoratomateos/distill
1•ricardomorato•24m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Sigma Runtime – Maintaining 100% Fact Integrity over 120 LLM Cycles

https://github.com/sigmastratum/documentation/tree/main/sigma-runtime/SR-053
1•teugent•25m ago•0 comments

Make a local open-source AI chatbot with access to Fedora documentation

https://fedoramagazine.org/how-to-make-a-local-open-source-ai-chatbot-who-has-access-to-fedora-do...
1•jadedtuna•26m ago•0 comments

Introduce the Vouch/Denouncement Contribution Model by Mitchellh

https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/pull/10559
1•samtrack2019•27m ago•0 comments

Software Factories and the Agentic Moment

https://factory.strongdm.ai/
1•mellosouls•27m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

California judge rules that Tesla engaged in deceptive marketing for Autopilot

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/16/california-judge-says-tesla-engaged-in-deceptive-autopilot-marketing-.html
71•elsewhen•1mo ago

Comments

johng•1mo ago
Long overdue, IMO.
windexh8er•1mo ago
And they'll keep paying the premium. I haven't looked at the Tesla website since Musk turned the corner, but is anyone actually paying this charlatan $8k for "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)"? After years of empty lies how is anyone still sucker enough?

And then... "Currently enabled features require active driver supervision and do not make the vehicle autonomous. The activation and use of these features are dependent on development and regulatory approval, which may take longer in some jurisdictions."

I can't believe they aren't forced to say that this may never happen, which is the reality given the history of it.

tstrimple•1mo ago
You see them in basically every HN thread mentioning Tesla with more than 20 comments defending everything Tesla or Musk do.
BugsJustFindMe•1mo ago
I'm annoyed by the stay, but I'm more annoyed that the desired penalty is just a 30 day suspension. No fine, no refunds for sales made under false pretenses.
millzlane•1mo ago
I honestly don't want to make this political and I'm not a libertarian. But this reminds me of something a libertarian once said. That courts would find companies liable for their crimes and someone would go to jail.

My question: Why isn't someone going to jail, when they have clearly broken a law?

dragonwriter•1mo ago
> My question: Why isn't someone going to jail, when they have clearly broken a law?

Because the law in question is civil, not criminal, and because the violation was found by an executive branch administrative law judge, not by a court of general jurisdiction in even a civil lawsuit.

ursAxZA•1mo ago
Honestly, the slowest actor here was the regulator. If the name “Full Self-Driving” was unacceptable, they could have stopped it years ago.

“Autopilot” is already a technical aviation term — planes don’t fly themselves while the pilot sleeps — so the misunderstanding comes from the public, not the term.

And without a legal framework defining responsibility for autonomous systems, the liability naturally falls back to the human who activates the feature.

So the root issue isn’t the marketing; it’s the regulatory vacuum that let the ambiguity persist.

(Just my impression as a non-expert observer.)

goosejuice•1mo ago
Completely agree. FTC has never acted on it either. Tesla is playing the game as have every other automaker.
ursAxZA•1mo ago
Exactly — if the terminology were truly unacceptable, the FTC would likely have intervened much earlier.

Regulators implicitly allowed the ambiguity to persist, and are now attempting to reframe or correct it retroactively.

It’s possible there were political or practical considerations — for example, a belief that successful autonomous driving would make future regulation easier, or at least postpone difficult legislative debates.

We can’t know what the internal reasoning was, but the long delay suggests more than simple oversight.

ycombinatrix•1mo ago
>if the terminology were truly unacceptable, the FTC would likely have intervened much earlier.

Lol wtf? Next you're going to tell me Bernie Madoff wasn't that bad because the SEC didn't intervene earlier.

ursAxZA•1mo ago
I’m not making a conspiracy claim, nor arguing that regulators are always reliable.

I’m describing a structural question:

Why was the terminology tolerated for years before being deemed unacceptable?

Regardless of whether one trusts the FTC/SEC/etc., two things remain true:

1. If the naming was truly deceptive from day one, early intervention would have prevented later misunderstandings.

2. The long delay created a regulatory vacuum in which ambiguity grew.

That’s the frame I’m pointing to — not defending regulators, just asking why the shift happened only now.

arunabha•1mo ago
I assume because Tesla, via Musk 's public proclamations kept claiming full self driving was just around the corner?

If you're assertion is that the FTC should be much more sceptical of claims by corporations, then you have a point.

ursAxZA•1mo ago
Yes — that’s one plausible explanation, and it still fits the same structural question.

Whether the delay came from optimistic expectations about imminent progress, political or economic incentives, or simple regulatory inertia, the core issue remains the same: the terminology was tolerated for a long period, and that tolerance allowed ambiguity to accumulate.

My point isn’t about defending Tesla or trusting regulators’ judgment — it’s about asking why the shift happened only after years of implicit acceptance, and what effects that delay had on public understanding and responsibility.

goosejuice•1mo ago
It's not like they weren't told multiple times to look into it. Lina Khan confirmed it was on their radar. She's one of the most pro consumer chairs we've had. She had 4 years to make a move if she thought a lawsuit was appropriate.

https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2021.08.18%2...

https://progresschamber.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/AV_-F...

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-...

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116199/documents/... page 40,41.

wqaatwt•1mo ago
> Why was the terminology tolerated for years before being deemed unacceptable?

Politics and/or incompetence. Nothing to do with conspiracy theories. Government agencies are very transparent (implicitly historically; these days were explicitly and you can also now add outright corruption to that) in general (not just regarding Tesla specifically)