frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: Engineering Perception with Combinatorial Memetics

1•alan_sass•3m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Steam Daily – A Wordle-like daily puzzle game for Steam fans

https://steamdaily.xyz
1•itshellboy•5m ago•0 comments

The Anthropic Hive Mind

https://steve-yegge.medium.com/the-anthropic-hive-mind-d01f768f3d7b
1•spenvo•5m ago•0 comments

Just Started Using AmpCode

https://intelligenttools.co/blog/ampcode-multi-agent-production
1•BojanTomic•7m ago•0 comments

LLM as an Engineer vs. a Founder?

1•dm03514•7m ago•0 comments

Crosstalk inside cells helps pathogens evade drugs, study finds

https://phys.org/news/2026-01-crosstalk-cells-pathogens-evade-drugs.html
2•PaulHoule•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Design system generator (mood to CSS in <1 second)

https://huesly.app
1•egeuysall•8m ago•1 comments

Show HN: 26/02/26 – 5 songs in a day

https://playingwith.variousbits.net/saturday
1•dmje•9m ago•0 comments

Toroidal Logit Bias – Reduce LLM hallucinations 40% with no fine-tuning

https://github.com/Paraxiom/topological-coherence
1•slye514•12m ago•1 comments

Top AI models fail at >96% of tasks

https://www.zdnet.com/article/ai-failed-test-on-remote-freelance-jobs/
4•codexon•12m ago•1 comments

The Science of the Perfect Second (2023)

https://harpers.org/archive/2023/04/the-science-of-the-perfect-second/
1•NaOH•13m ago•0 comments

Bob Beck (OpenBSD) on why vi should stay vi (2006)

https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=115820462402673&w=2
2•birdculture•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: a glimpse into the future of eye tracking for multi-agent use

https://github.com/dchrty/glimpsh
1•dochrty•17m ago•0 comments

The Optima-l Situation: A deep dive into the classic humanist sans-serif

https://micahblachman.beehiiv.com/p/the-optima-l-situation
2•subdomain•17m ago•1 comments

Barn Owls Know When to Wait

https://blog.typeobject.com/posts/2026-barn-owls-know-when-to-wait/
1•fintler•18m ago•0 comments

Implementing TCP Echo Server in Rust [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjOBZ_Xzuio
1•sheerluck•18m ago•0 comments

LicGen – Offline License Generator (CLI and Web UI)

1•tejavvo•21m ago•0 comments

Service Degradation in West US Region

https://azure.status.microsoft/en-gb/status?gsid=5616bb85-f380-4a04-85ed-95674eec3d87&utm_source=...
2•_____k•21m ago•0 comments

The Janitor on Mars

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/10/26/the-janitor-on-mars
1•evo_9•23m ago•0 comments

Bringing Polars to .NET

https://github.com/ErrorLSC/Polars.NET
3•CurtHagenlocher•25m ago•0 comments

Adventures in Guix Packaging

https://nemin.hu/guix-packaging.html
1•todsacerdoti•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: We had 20 Claude terminals open, so we built Orcha

1•buildingwdavid•26m ago•0 comments

Your Best Thinking Is Wasted on the Wrong Decisions

https://www.iankduncan.com/engineering/2026-02-07-your-best-thinking-is-wasted-on-the-wrong-decis...
1•iand675•26m ago•0 comments

Warcraftcn/UI – UI component library inspired by classic Warcraft III aesthetics

https://www.warcraftcn.com/
1•vyrotek•28m ago•0 comments

Trump Vodka Becomes Available for Pre-Orders

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kirkogunrinde/2025/12/01/trump-vodka-becomes-available-for-pre-order...
1•stopbulying•29m ago•0 comments

Velocity of Money

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity_of_money
1•gurjeet•31m ago•0 comments

Stop building automations. Start running your business

https://www.fluxtopus.com/automate-your-business
1•valboa•36m ago•1 comments

You can't QA your way to the frontier

https://www.scorecard.io/blog/you-cant-qa-your-way-to-the-frontier
1•gk1•37m ago•0 comments

Show HN: PalettePoint – AI color palette generator from text or images

https://palettepoint.com
1•latentio•37m ago•0 comments

Robust and Interactable World Models in Computer Vision [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B4kkaGOozA
2•Anon84•41m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: Built Valmi to bill AI Agents(Open Alternative to Paid.ai, Legacy Zuora

https://github.com/valmi-io/value
4•rajvarkala•1mo ago
Hi HN,

I am Raj, founder of Valmi.

We were building AI agents and quickly hit a pricing problem.

Tokens, API calls, and seats made no sense for agents. One agent run might be cheap and useless; another might be expensive and replace hours of human work. Billing on usage felt disconnected from real value.

What customers actually asked was: “Did it finish the task?” “Did it resolve the ticket?”

That pushed us toward outcome-based billing - charge only when the agent delivers something meaningful.

But existing billing systems don’t handle this well:

outcomes aren’t first-class concepts costs vary per run (LLMs, tools, retries) it’s hard to see margins per agent or customer

So we built Valmi:

1. outcomes as billable units 2. cost + margin tracked per agent run 3. outcome, usage, or hybrid pricing 4. open-source SDKs, self-hostable stack

Outcome billing also builds trust: customers pay for results, not experiments.

Available on GitHub (https://github.com/valmi-io/value).

I also wrote my hypothesis here: https://www.valmi.io/blog/an-imperative-for-ai-agents-outcom...

Would love your feedback! Also hosted at https://value.valmi.io

-Raj

Comments

rajvarkala•1mo ago
I am curious to know your opinions to the questions I am thinking about.

What do you think are the challenges with AI Agents pricing? How you are currently pricing your AI Agents work?

Would be great to know what HN community thinks.

nagendras-2125•1mo ago
Hi Raj, If the cost of running an AI agent can vary a lot from task to task, how do teams determine pricing while keeping profits and financial risk under control?
rajvarkala•1mo ago
Hey ,

As costs vary, I think it becomes even more important to track costs for each task.

Also, if costs also vary a lot without usefulness, it becomes difficult to pass these costs onto the customer.

Hence pricing needs to take care of volatility in cost as well. However, pricing is mostly dependent on the value AI Agents create. That I think, AI builders need to generate somehow, instead of just activity.

dipeshsukhani•1mo ago
CPA here. The math on this is brutal because of the fixed fee floor. If an agent performs a $0.05 task, a standard $0.30 + 2.9% fee structure puts you at a negative margin immediately. This is a solvency issue, not just a pricing one. You literally cannot monetize granular, high frequency agent traffic with legacy banking rails. The only way the P&L works for micro services ($0.01 to $0.10) is via rails where the settlement cost is negligible (<$0.001), regardless of the asset class used.
cnu1439•1mo ago
Who owns the definition of outcome? Furthermore, how do we achieve alignment when the desired results are nuanced or subjective?
rajvarkala•1mo ago
Some definitions of outcomes I believe are very easy to determine. Even if the outcomes are easy to determine, the outcomes I am certain are negotiated between the buyer and seller, just as a service contract.

There could be some workflows where outcomes may not be immediately delivered. Take for instance, a recruiting AI agent solving a successful hire. I would be very glad to understand those scenarios in the field.

thisisankit_me•1mo ago
Hi Raj, How do you programmatically and objectively define a successful outcome in a way that prevents billing disputes between the provider and their customers?