I had to switch emails so I had to create a new account.
Seems bonkers.
Can this be used as a dagger to the heart of all the arguments about the revolutionary nature of what we currently call AI?
What a mockery this is.
Everything else including email and username should be changeable (provided there's no conflict with other accounts)
maybe they should ask CC to fix this...
I appealed and got a standard Google Forms response. There was no follow-up after that. It never got fixed and I never tried again... plenty of free, more accessible fish out there, and various agents like Copilot give me access to Sonnet anyway.
But now I wonder, what is it about the account that triggered this block. If it was because of the reputation of the account, how did Anthropic even know that this account was created a few weeks ago?
Historically, outlook emails have been very easy for this compared to gmail addresses, which require phone numbers, etc.
You mean your email address. Mine works fine.
The email I signed up for got compromised a couple of months ago and I ended up having to delete my entire GPT account, losing all my history, to recreate using a new email.
It was super annoying and, out of hundreds of websites I had to update, only OpenAI and Anthropic wouldn't let me change my email. A few of them required contacting support with some sort of proof, but at least doable.
I made the mistake of using my company provided ChatGPT account for non-work stuff. It was fine before the memory features came out. But now I'm regretting not having a separate personal one.
Edit: For ChatGPT (not sure about Claude) https://help.openai.com/en/articles/9106926-transferring-con...
Perplexingly, this business account is as bad as a Google Workplace account. It has restrictions on it that I didn't have when I was on my own account. As an example, I can't share chats outside the organization. Fine, all right then.
Google allows AI browser automation through Gemini CLI as well, but it's not interactive and doesn't have ready access to the main browser profile.
The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller without undue delay the rectification of inaccurate personal data concerning him or her.
Taking into account the purposes of the processing, the data subject shall have the right to have incomplete personal data completed, including by means of providing a supplementary statement.
https://gdpr-info.eu/art-16-gdpr/
Obviously if you change your email address, the old one ceases to be correct, even if it was correct before.
HPMOR•1h ago
rbtprograms•59m ago
ares623•54m ago
blitzegg•45m ago
prmph•35m ago
darth_avocado•11m ago
prmph•39m ago
Unless there is some deep technical reason why thing have to be this way, which I very much doubt.
And now they can't change it? Where is Claude when you him/her
jaggederest•14m ago
> I'd recommend against using email as the primary key for a large LLM chat website. Here's why:
> Problems with email as primary key:
> 1. Emails change - Users often want to update their email addresses. With email as PK, you'd need to cascade updates across all related tables (chat sessions, messages, settings, etc.), which is expensive and error-prone
> [Edited for length]
sixothree•34m ago
Glyptodon•33m ago
aunty_helen•46m ago
perotid•31m ago
I'm just guessing, but the above might suggest a potential incentive: They would like you to hand over a valuable/longterm email, as opposed to a temporary email (for supposedly more privacy or testing), by making it difficult to change it later.
'Dark patterns are the pavement of todays corporate infrastructure.'
doctorpangloss•29m ago
CPLX•9m ago
Obviously, there's a way to do that still. Not saying it's a good idea. But if I had to guess as to why, that's the one that comes to mind.