What to Do When the Trisector Comes (1983) [pdf]

https://www.ufv.ca/media/faculty/gregschlitt/information/WhatToDoWhenTrisectorComes.pdf

93•robertvc•1mo ago

Comments

lambdaone•1mo ago

Also relevant to this topic:

Fred Gruenberger's Measure for Crackpots (1962):

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2006/P2678...

John Baez's Crackpot Index (1998):

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

quotemstr•1mo ago

These are fantastic. Thank you

cenazoic•1mo ago

That Gruenberger piece is a fantastic read and still applicable today.

lbruck•1mo ago

Underwood Dudley has written more comprehensive books about mathematical cranks (in general) and trisectors (in particular) which are a delight to read.

conditionnumber•1mo ago

For some reason the article made me think about this quote from one of the 2025 MacArthur Fellowship videos, "I think there are some mathematicians who are kind of like the hiker who choose this massive peak they want to scale and they do everything they can to make it up the mountain. I'm more like the kind of hiker who wanders through the forest and stops to look at a pretty stone or flower and reflect on whether it's similar to a stone or flower that I've seen before."

user____name•1mo ago

Reads as if written by a Brontosaurus expert.

dang•1mo ago

What to Do When the Trisector Comes (PDF, 1983) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34404927 - Jan 2023 (1 comment)

Beware of Cranks: Misguided attempts to solve impossible mathematical problems - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21206633 - Oct 2019 (61 comments)

What to Do When the Trisector Comes (1983) [pdf] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14446708 - May 2017 (28 comments) (<-- hello!)

nullc•1mo ago

The advice here is now increasingly out of date in the era of LLMs. Trisectors are more numerous and voluminous than ever, while being less obvious and more effective at wasting your time, and approaching a far greater variety of subjects, and any kind of response to one has a much greater risk of outright aggressive and even threatening responses as sycophantic AIs escalate their users otherwise benign hyperfocus into outright paranoid delusions.

gcr•1mo ago

Out of date?

If what you say is true, shouldn’t that make the understanding of trisectors more urgent and important? If anything, this is more relevant than before.

nullc•3w ago

I'm not sure. I think LLMs makes different people into trisectors and they trisect in different ways-- so not just much more numerous but also somewhat different in character.

filoeleven•1mo ago

LLMs are trisector factories.

awanderingmind•1mo ago

I found the writing, and the descriptions of the types of trisectors, strangely poignant. Most of us do not attempt to trisect an angle with straightedge and compass; but surely many of us have other irrational obsessions with which we waste our time (I have certainly been guilty of this). I hope people can find time to look up from their interactions with social media and LLMs for enough healthy introspection to avoid these traps.

saagarjha•1mo ago

I was briefly a trisector in middle school but at least I was fortunate enough to have access to Geogebra which quickly showed me the error in my procedure. I wonder what other tools we can give a curious but potentially misguided person so they too do not fall too deep into the rabbit hole.

EdwardCoffin•1mo ago

In the same vein is the talk Pathological Physics: Tales from 'The Box' [1] which talks about various physics papers written by amateurs and sent in to the physics department at the university the speaker was in.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXSgp755DSA

maweki•1mo ago

I had a lot of contact with computer science students coming from the other side, meaning they used Z3 or other (SMT) solvers as blackboxes which they just use at a certain point in their algorithm without having thought what theories they are using (the T in SMT) and what's undecidable in general or in that theory.

So I had quite a few "groundbreaking" approaches end in disappointment.

It's important to know the capabilities and limits of your tools.

gcr•1mo ago

It’s interesting to me that Augustus DeMorgan’s view of “a paradoxer” is someone who “attacks the consequences, direct and indirect, of the mathematical method.” (gentle paraphrase)

Why is that the central tenet of being a paradoxer? To me, that’s how I learn and internalize things. I take the premise under study, find some consequence that feels absurd, and turn it this way and that in my mind until the flaw in my own previous thinking becomes clear to me.

Are there better ways of learning?

Does this make me more prone to being a paradoxer?

talyian•1mo ago

It makes you a paradoxer if you stopped after the step of finding the consequence that feels absurd.

theodorethomas•1mo ago

The sheer amount of dedication is awe-inspiring. In the 80s, at Imperial College, London, Theoretical Physics Group, we came across some correspondence intended for one of the professors, I think. This person had evidently "translated" his native Spanish into English, laboriously, via some dictionary we thought. We spent many tea breaks puzzling over phrases such as

"Is well-knew the refran: of the said to made it has a good road."

Are AI agents ready for the workplace? A new benchmark raises doubts

Show HN: AI Watermark and Stego Scanner

Clarity vs. complexity: the invisible work of subtraction

Solid-State Freezer Needs No Refrigerants

Ask HN: Will LLMs/AI Decrease Human Intelligence and Make Expertise a Commodity?

From Zero to Hero: A Brief Introduction to Spring Boot

NSA detected phone call between foreign intelligence and person close to Trump

How to Fake a Robotics Result

It's time for the world to boycott the US

Show HN: Semantic Search for terminal commands in the Browser (No Back end)

The AI CEO Experiment

Speed up responses with fast mode

MS-DOS game copy protection and cracks

Updates on GNU/Hurd progress [video]

Epstein took a photo of his 2015 dinner with Zuckerberg and Musk

MyFlames: Visualize MySQL query execution plans as interactive FlameGraphs

Show HN: LLM of Babel

A modern iperf3 alternative with a live TUI, multi-client server, QUIC support

Famfamfam Silk icons – also with CSS spritesheet

Apple is the only Big Tech company whose capex declined last quarter

Reverse-Engineering Raiders of the Lost Ark for the Atari 2600

Show HN: Deterministic NDJSON audit logs – v1.2 update (structural gaps)

The Greater Copenhagen Region could be your friend's next career move

Do Not Confirm – Fiction by OpenClaw

The Analytical Profile of Peas

Hallucinations in GPT5 – Can models say "I don't know" (June 2025)

What AI is good for, according to developers

OpenAI might pivot to the "most addictive digital friend" or face extinction

Show HN: Know how your SaaS is doing in 30 seconds

ClawdBot Ordered Me Lunch