ACM Is Now Open Access

https://www.acm.org/articles/bulletins/2026/january/acm-open-access

174•leglock•1h ago

Comments

SkySkimmer•1h ago

and at the same time paywalled metadata https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/restore-fully-free-and-o...

bugglebeetle•1h ago

This is lame, but always remember that OpenAlex exists and is completely free:

https://openalex.org/works?page=1&filter=primary_location.so...

ModernMech•1h ago

This is great news and really makes me want to submit to ACM over IEEE.

rgreekguy•53m ago

They are both hosted on the same platform, which is owned by John Wiley & Sons.

elashri•1h ago

> ACM will become one of the very few organizations to offer a large, integrated, and highly curated library of articles and related artifacts openly accessible to all

Is there anything specific about them doing that? Most of the publishers are now moving to open access model (where they charge authors thousands and still not paying for reviewers) so not sure about their claim here.

thechao•42m ago

I was in academia for only a few years. I did a lot of reviewing (one of the chores for graduate students). I don't know what to say, here; there needs to be an economically based gate keeper for publication & review. Otherwise you'll get spammed by hundreds (per graduate student) of crazy-people papers. I was in a niche PL subfield (generic programming in the mid-2000s), and there was this one guy I called "guitar dude" that kept submitting PL papers using "guitar theory". The basis of the theory was an "algorithm" he developed to determine if a number was prime in O(1) (constant!!?) time in the size of the number. He was by far the most determined; he had a "swap" scam he ran to get his papers in. OTOH, submissions to the editor (my PI) numbered in the THOUSANDS, and we only had, like, 35 attendees at GPCE? I can't imagine what Nature or Science have to deal with.

I don't know how submission works for non-Western subsidized countries; but, just wading through the pre-AI submission process was a 50+-hour a week job for one, tiny, niche conference. Making the cost $1000 cuts that down by at least 2 orders of magnitude.

On the flip side ... paying the reviewers just seems like a bad idea? Reviewers need to be skeptical AF. Even the best scientists can throw out turds every now and then.

lmc•37m ago

> paying the reviewers just seems like a bad idea? Reviewers need to be skeptical AF

Sorry, it's not obvious to me - how might payment for reviewers affect their decision making?

thechao•34m ago

Let's be real: graduate students are not paid well. Even a modest payment scheme would be a dramatic boost in their income. What payment schedule would you use for review? By paper? By journal? If it's "by paper" then the students will be motivated to churn through the papers to get paid. I'm not sure what the incentive structure is there, but it doesn't sound right.

I guess the journals could turn around and pay the PI? But, then what? The "reviewers" still aren't being paid; just the PI? The incentive then is for the PI to have as many grad students as possible just reviewing papers. (FREE. MONEY.) If there was ever a dynamic I've been in where one agent doesn't need MORE power, it's the PI-grad-student one.

And, I've not even considered (in depth) the Bad Actors™ in such a situation. I'm just thinking about basic humans humaning along...

vinni2•1h ago

While it is free for readers, authors or author institutions still need to pay to publish the papers.

> Authors from institutions not participating in ACM Open will need to pay an APC to publish their papers, unless they qualify for a financial or discretionary waiver. To find out whether an APC applies to your article, please consult the list of participating institutions in ACM Open and review the APC Waivers and Discounts Policy. Keep in mind that waivers are rare and are granted based on specific criteria set by ACM.

https://cc.acm.org/2026/open-access/

random3•12m ago

Given the current trends in publishing "productivity" that may not be a bad thing.

colesantiago•1h ago

This is a great start, but it is not enough.

We need to keep pushing for other journals, IEEE, Springer, Elsevier, to be open access and free for all.

logifail•58m ago

I'm not sure "open access" in this context actually means, err, that the access is actually open.

emil-lp•54m ago

What do you mean? Open access means exactly what it says.

scott_s•19m ago

IEEE may do it, as it's a professional organization. That is, they're a non-profit dedicated to the furtherance of the field. Being open access fits their mission, and the costs can be handled by dues and fees. Springer and Elsevier are for-profit publishers. I don't know how if they can have an open-access business model.

jules•1h ago

This is good, but they're now charging authors a publishing fee of over $1000 per article (and they say that that is the discounted price). It is unclear whether this is justified. In my experience publishing scientific articles with ACM, all the real work (such as peer review) is done by volunteers. From what I can tell, ACM just hosts the exact PDF + metadata that authors supply. I suspect that in the future, more journals and conferences will switch to an arXiv-overlay model.

ghshephard•6m ago

I'm pretty sure the primary purpose of the $1000 is just to create some small gate to avoid overloading reviewers/ACM. There are probably other mechanisms that could be used - such as having "recommendations" for from already approved researchers - I think arXiv has something like that.

jules•4m ago

[delayed]

riazrizvi•54m ago

Finally. This might have a material impact on improving professional standards in the industry.

Here’s the actual link to content https://dl.acm.org/

zkmon•34m ago

More fodder for LLMs? I don't think humans are going to directly consume all that text.

scott_s•23m ago

Great news. They temporarily opened it in 2020 during the pandemic. I argued it should remain so in a post: https://www.scott-a-s.com/acm-digital-library-should-remain-.... I'm glad it's finally happened.

theodpHN•17m ago

As noted above, 'Fully Open Access' does not mean completely free. So, while this change is welcome, there are still a lot of pricing/licensing options:

Corporate https://libraries.acm.org/subscriptions-access/corporate-pri...

Government https://libraries.acm.org/subscriptions-access/government/dl...

Academic Institutions https://libraries.acm.org/acmopen

Individuals https://dl.acm.org/action/publisherEcommerceHelper?doi=10.55...

Also, the 'Basic Edition' provided for free to individuals without institutional/individual accounts, the ACM explains, does not include niceties such as 'Advanced Search' (e.g., filters), which requires an upgrade https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/55017806873_c9ba2490c1_b...

agumonkey•16m ago

Kudos. I wonder how long it took to 1) decide this move, 2) actually migrate their system

macintux•13m ago

Discussed extensively two weeks ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46313991 (243 comments)

Technology Is Culture

Show HN: Handsom.ai – Vibe coding sites you don't have to rebuild

AI Shifts Expectations for Entry Level Jobs

Brain – The Hallucinating Chemist: From Synapse to Self

Crypto users forced to share account details with tax officials

I made auto-aim for mini golf [video]

I Thought 2025 Was Cloudy. 26 Years of Data Proved Me Wrong

FAFO: How we stopped worrying and bought an Electron Microscope [video]

Show HN: Toy Browser Update (January 2026) [video]

New maps reveal post-flood migration patterns across the US

Swapping two blocks of memory inside a larger block, in constant memory

China drafts strictest rules to end AI-encouraged suicide, violence

Show HN: Memoria – Spam exists, but can't climb (A local-first protocol)

The peace of a nation no longer besieged by the third world

NJ buying flood prone properties

Public Domain Day 2026 in Literature

WireGuard packet relay for NAT traversal

Show HN: Guess the Move Chess App

Amy Schumer Moves On, Selling 'Moonstruck' House in Brooklyn

TimesWire

A Sparse Transformer with Tunable Emergent Subnetworks

Which Power Plant Does My Electricity Come From? [video]

Every LLM hallucinates that std:vector deletes elements in LIFO order

The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation

Ask HN: How Are You Handling Auth in 2026?

Amoskeag: F/OSS DSL for business rules - functional language inspired by Ruby

AI is not neutral. It judges you [video]

Show HN: Downmark – Turn webpages into distraction-free Markdown

Back to basics: The foundations that shape everything we design

MHC: Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections