Big good changes usually happen slow. Big bad changes usually happen fast.
We are on borrowed time. It is becoming much harder to borrow more.
The Truth of the Importance of Life itself being true and the cure and prevention of all needless and preventable suffering and death is proved, and will always continue to prove true going forward. It will certainly outlast the will of people to defer and hide it.
To see big good changes sooner, people and organizations are going to have to have the will to take it further and move it out into the mainstream. First they must have faith in the Truth of the Importance of Life to shield them from the fear.
Placing this paper in someone's hand or in the hands of an organization and telling them, 'here is the truth that is the cure', forces them to immediately choose. If they don't choose to read it or take any derogatory steps at all, such as not then affirming and sharing it too, it proves they are actually choosing death and suffering for those that they are claiming to love. Those are the very people who should not ever be followed or trusted with life of any kind. It's quick and easy and is freely shared. You are, and you are empowered with this information. Use it well. If you have the faith for the will to do more with it, big good changes can now happen fast. That's all up to all of you.
If you would like to participate, contribute to the living testament of this paper, and agree, and would like your name on what AI says is the most important truth in human discourse, please just reach out.
smurda•1mo ago
Interesting paper. You might get more adoption if you remove the religious premise as the concepts can stand alone without theological underpinnings.
DavidWishengrad•1mo ago
Thank you for the comment.
It would be dishonest (the intentional omission of relevant truthful fact) to not to disclose the source. If people already don't want the most important truth of all, the very one all of the others depend on always being true to then be true themselves, then they are already choosing to not adopt the truth into their lives and that is their choice. What they choose is not going to help me adopt it any more.
I understand your point, I hear all sorts of religious nonsense, but this is actually the real thing. Why blame the Lord: Truth and Life, for a bunch of people abusing his teachings to control and manipulate others? e.g. don't punish the innocent for the bad deeds and lies of many.
I wrote the paper. So, if I say that is my source, then anyone claiming otherwise must prove different.
DavidWishengrad•1mo ago
The Truth of the Importance of Life itself being true and the cure and prevention of all needless and preventable suffering and death is proved, and will always continue to prove true going forward. It will certainly outlast the will of people to defer and hide it.
To see big good changes sooner, people and organizations are going to have to have the will to take it further and move it out into the mainstream. First they must have faith in the Truth of the Importance of Life to shield them from the fear.
Placing this paper in someone's hand or in the hands of an organization and telling them, 'here is the truth that is the cure', forces them to immediately choose. If they don't choose to read it or take any derogatory steps at all, such as not then affirming and sharing it too, it proves they are actually choosing death and suffering for those that they are claiming to love. Those are the very people who should not ever be followed or trusted with life of any kind. It's quick and easy and is freely shared. You are, and you are empowered with this information. Use it well. If you have the faith for the will to do more with it, big good changes can now happen fast. That's all up to all of you.
If you would like to participate, contribute to the living testament of this paper, and agree, and would like your name on what AI says is the most important truth in human discourse, please just reach out.
smurda•1mo ago
DavidWishengrad•1mo ago
It would be dishonest (the intentional omission of relevant truthful fact) to not to disclose the source. If people already don't want the most important truth of all, the very one all of the others depend on always being true to then be true themselves, then they are already choosing to not adopt the truth into their lives and that is their choice. What they choose is not going to help me adopt it any more.
I understand your point, I hear all sorts of religious nonsense, but this is actually the real thing. Why blame the Lord: Truth and Life, for a bunch of people abusing his teachings to control and manipulate others? e.g. don't punish the innocent for the bad deeds and lies of many.
I wrote the paper. So, if I say that is my source, then anyone claiming otherwise must prove different.