frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: Jwtpeek – minimal, user-friendly JWT inspector in Go

https://github.com/alesr/jwtpeek
1•alesrdev•1m ago•0 comments

Willow – Protocols for an uncertain future [video]

https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/CVGZAV-willow/
1•todsacerdoti•2m ago•0 comments

Feedback on a client-side, privacy-first PDF editor I built

https://pdffreeeditor.com/
1•Maaz-Sohail•6m ago•0 comments

Clay Christensen's Milkshake Marketing (2011)

https://www.library.hbs.edu/working-knowledge/clay-christensens-milkshake-marketing
2•vismit2000•13m ago•0 comments

Show HN: WeaveMind – AI Workflows with human-in-the-loop

https://weavemind.ai
4•quentin101010•19m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Seedream 5.0: free AI image generator that claims strong text rendering

https://seedream5ai.org
1•dallen97•20m ago•0 comments

A contributor trust management system based on explicit vouches

https://github.com/mitchellh/vouch
2•admp•22m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Analyzing 9 years of HN side projects that reached $500/month

2•haileyzhou•23m ago•0 comments

The Floating Dock for Developers

https://snap-dock.co
2•OsamaJaber•24m ago•0 comments

Arcan Explained – A browser for different webs

https://arcan-fe.com/2026/01/26/arcan-explained-a-browser-for-different-webs/
2•walterbell•25m ago•0 comments

We are not scared of AI, we are scared of irrelevance

https://adlrocha.substack.com/p/adlrocha-we-are-not-scared-of-ai
1•adlrocha•26m ago•0 comments

Quartz Crystals

https://www.pa3fwm.nl/technotes/tn13a.html
1•gtsnexp•29m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built a free dictionary API to avoid API keys

https://github.com/suvankar-mitra/free-dictionary-rest-api
2•suvankar_m•31m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Kybera – Agentic Smart Wallet with AI Osint and Reputation Tracking

https://kybera.xyz
2•xipz•33m ago•0 comments

Show HN: brew changelog – find upstream changelogs for Homebrew packages

https://github.com/pavel-voronin/homebrew-changelog
1•kolpaque•36m ago•0 comments

Any chess position with 8 pieces on board and one pair of pawns has been solved

https://mastodon.online/@lichess/116029914921844500
2•baruchel•38m ago•1 comments

LLMs as Language Compilers: Lessons from Fortran for the Future of Coding

https://cyber-omelette.com/posts/the-abstraction-rises.html
2•birdculture•40m ago•0 comments

Projecting high-dimensional tensor/matrix/vect GPT–>ML

https://github.com/tambetvali/LaegnaAIHDvisualization
1•tvali•41m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Free Bank Statement Analyzer to Find Spending Leaks and Save Money

https://www.whereismymoneygo.com/
2•raleobob•44m ago•1 comments

Our Stolen Light

https://ayushgundawar.me/posts/html/our_stolen_light.html
2•gundawar•45m ago•0 comments

Matchlock: Linux-based sandboxing for AI agents

https://github.com/jingkaihe/matchlock
2•jingkai_he•47m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A2A Protocol – Infrastructure for an Agent-to-Agent Economy

2•swimmingkiim•51m ago•1 comments

Drinking More Water Can Boost Your Energy

https://www.verywellhealth.com/can-drinking-water-boost-energy-11891522
1•wjb3•55m ago•0 comments

Proving Laderman's 3x3 Matrix Multiplication Is Locally Optimal via SMT Solvers

https://zenodo.org/records/18514533
1•DarenWatson•57m ago•0 comments

Fire may have altered human DNA

https://www.popsci.com/science/fire-alter-human-dna/
4•wjb3•57m ago•2 comments

"Compiled" Specs

https://deepclause.substack.com/p/compiled-specs
1•schmuhblaster•1h ago•0 comments

The Next Big Language (2007) by Steve Yegge

https://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2007/02/next-big-language.html?2026
1•cryptoz•1h ago•0 comments

Open-Weight Models Are Getting Serious: GLM 4.7 vs. MiniMax M2.1

https://blog.kilo.ai/p/open-weight-models-are-getting-serious
4•ms7892•1h ago•0 comments

Using AI for Code Reviews: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why

https://entelligence.ai/blogs/entelligence-ai-in-cli
3•Arindam1729•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Solnix – an early-stage experimental programming language

https://www.solnix-lang.org/
4•maheshbhatiya•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: Why Can't We Make Approved Building Plans Reusable?

7•silexia•1mo ago
Why do people have to go through an entire architectural drawing and engineering process for every single building we create? Maybe we would require a soils test to make sure the ground has the same bearing capacity. If a building plan is approved by government officials, that plan should be available on the approved list for anybody to use at any time going forward. It is stupid that people have to spend $20,000 or $30,000 every time they want to build a box that has been approved and built literally hundreds of thousands of times before.

The architectural and engineering special interests have really captured their regulators on this one.

Comments

appreciatorBus•1mo ago
Because city planners and Nimby homeowners do not want it to be easy to build new building buildings. Every extra dollar you can force a proponent to spend, increases the odds that the project will no longer be economic to build, and simply not be built. For those most active in city politics, this is a win.

It goes way beyond design.

Early housing reformers in the 1920s, explicitly called for punitive fire regulations for multifamily buildings to make them on economical while admitting that they would not ask for any fire regulations for single-family buildings whatsoever.

[1] https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0194436920897553...

silexia•1mo ago
How can we fight back against the special interests in every portion of society putting themselves ahead of everyone else?
bigyabai•1mo ago
Move to an anarchist commune?
appreciatorBus•1mo ago
The fastest way to turn an anarchist into a Central Planner is to propose a building whose aesthetics they dislike.
baubino•1mo ago
It’s a liability issue. The approval is granted to the architect or engineer who stamps/signs the building plans. The plan itself demonstrates that the structure meets all legal and safety requirements. If something goes wrong, whoever signed that plan is personally liable.
silexia•1mo ago
The liability can simply be on the builder if they choose to use a separately approved plan. The builder has liability anyways.
baubino•1mo ago
In most places (in the US at least), all building plans over a certain size require a stamp from an architect or engineer. Builders get their plans stamped by an architect or engineer too. No builder will willingly take on liability that they currently don’t have, especially since it will cost them more money (in insurance premiums).

The exception is smaller buildings (usually less than 2000 sq ft) and in some places, all single family is exempt from needing a stamp.

edit: I should add that I’m not against the idea of reusable plans. But the liability issue would need to be solved somehow. Who is going to be responsible if something goes wrong?

yorwba•1mo ago
I don't see why the person who assumes liability for the plans for one building couldn't also assume liability for n exact copies built using the same plans. Of course that goes against OP's wish of not having to pay for the plans, but if you're willing to pay, liability is not an issue.
baubino•1mo ago
I imagine that would raise the price of the plans significantly because, again, no one wants to take on more liability than they already have, and definitely won’t do so without additional compensation. At the very least, liability insurance would increase (if it even allows it).
jamesgill•1mo ago
TL;DR: liability.