Blue dot navigation has failed because it doesn't translate to I door spaces. Video with motion aware playback gives the illusion of an AR experience - but avoids the drift issues that plagued AR driven experiences.

I can cite for you plenty of 1st person POV pilots where the consumer feedback has been exceptional

You tell a CXO they can have indoor wayfinding to improve patient experience scores and there is no cap ex because there is no hardware - there is literally zero reason to turn it down.

They have nothing to lose and everything to gain

1. For a long time developers focused on AR tech to try and create indoor nav experiences. Reality check: People don't care how they get there. Just that they get there. 1st person POV gets them there, without ever having to download an app or exchange any of their own data. For a more native type experience, I do intend to have this built into iOS app clips, again with the intention that an end user should never have to download a full app just to be able to navigate a space

2. Videographers are getting displaced by genAI at a rapid rate. This sucks. Krowdovi is an offramp in the future of work. A properly funded liquidity pool and a willingness to pivot talents into a different style of work, the indoor navigation market is poised for massive growth ($28B TAM). This platform is being designed to be very much like Hivemapper, but for indoor spaces. This provides creators like videographers an opportunity to start their own business and through DePIN, have a real ownership stake in the company

3. This is the maybe 3rd core problem - vendor lock ins suck. Especially in healthcare. The burn mint model is designed to be a more future tech approach to value based contracting. Instead of having to pay software vendors upfront for warez that end up not working and nobody uses, in this model, the health systems are only burning (paying) when/if the videos are being used. Proper incentive structures - I am incentivized to build something that isn't just the next vaporware, creators are incentivized to record quality routes with proper overlays, and the health systems themselves can approach this from the perspective of - what do we have to lose?

Long tail - there is no good data source for video of indoor spaces either. If compute costs continue to trend down - I really am thinking about machine learning on the video - adding some contextual data, it's possible to create an experiential mode for those who are blind. Instead of just narrating to them how to get where they are going - how about telling them literally all about the world around them... Now that's what I'm talking about!

Paper maps are made of lines and boxes, and rooms & wards are generally numbers and letters.

Further, any hospital in a multi-lingual area will ensure they provide service in the languages they expect people to speak. For everyone else there’s family members to do the visit with.

Is the healthcare industry really losing money?

Is it losing enough money to sit through an explanation of Solana?

Which part of the industry do you refer to?

How many stakeholders have you spoken to?

Do you come from an enterprise sales background?

Have you sold things into large enterprises before?

Have you sold things into large enterprises operating under strict regulations where your solution must coexist with decades of legacy iteration?

Sorry to be an ass, but, I only want to spare you the 2-3 years you’re about to sink chasing this.