Interrupting communications it's a serious crime in Europe too, with either high fines or straight prison time, but ethically I feel nothing for the webmaster. The same if someone deleted the social network profiles (and the whole infra) of narco armies in Mexico.
I'm definitely curious why so many people simultaneously hold the viewpoints where the second group has it coming for them and rightfully deserve to be bulldozed out of existence, but the first should be treated with understanding and compassion.
Have you ever been curious about what the life could been under MAGA's with the Christianism raised with full powers? Read about the first years of that regime, from 1939 to 1953.
Replace Catholicism with Evangelism or any major American Christian branch and that's pretty much the same.
Oh, and the economic collapse. That would be a thing, too. When the scientists are fed with bullshit and flee away your whole economy collapses.
It's ironic that supremacists tend to be the worst examples of humanity.
You can accept that, or you can get swept up into an ideology that says "the subgroup I'm in is better than all the other subgroups", and then, WOW! You're automatically better than most other people without having to do anything!
Maybe put a bounty for their prosecution and conviction.
carlotavez•1d ago
undeveloper•1d ago
defrost•1d ago
> I’d think if the sites are based in the US and the owners decided to take action, they could force this activist to be extradited and face punishment.
US based content owners have had mixed success forcing hackers to be extradited and face punishment in the US.
Many ransomware gangs are still operating, Anna's Archive is still up, ThePirateBay continues to defy Hollywood.
Sure, some hackers are caught and dragged through courts. Many are not. Enough to make your statement questionable.
altairprime•1d ago
cmxch•16h ago
Doxin•1d ago
ndsipa_pomu•1d ago
LexiMax•1d ago
jijijijij•1d ago
The site, and the extended media presence are full of hardcore racist statements not protected under the German constitution, not considered legal expressions of free speech here. If you have seen the talk, you'd know the site/owner has been investigated by the German inland intelligence agency (Verfassungsschutz), but due to incompetence they only got the wrong person fired... In fact, the "Q&A" intro to the deletion bit, references the executive's inaction.
Some information disclosure is also evidently in the public interest. For example the AfD representatives found are additional evidence for anti-constitutional sentiments within the AfD. This is highly relevant for a possible party prohibition process (which has an extremely high legal threshold).
After all, the website security was hilariously bad. (I suspect the members' IQ scores may have been largely self-diagnosed...) From what I've gathered the publicized data has been somewhat anonymized. The victims of this hack should be rather happy the original data got nuked.
Also good luck extraditing the activist. It's pretty clear the pink power ranger on stage is a borrowed body, and/or, I presume, the voice heard is AI or borrowed recording, as well. OpSec seems alright. But you know, these days, the president of the United States may personally order the NSA and navy seals to snatch the Martha Root off the streets to uphold the holy rule of law and freedom of speech/expression...
rsynnott•1d ago
tavavex•21h ago
owebmaster•21h ago
cmxch•17h ago
Justice follows the law, not the whims of hacktivism.