He's talking about how it's legal and common in the US for governmental agencies to work around the fourth amendment by obtaining the information they want from a third party who has it legally and is willing to give it over.
It's a genuine travesty.
tveita•1d ago
Between state actors, AI competitors and criminals, there's a lot of people who wouldn't mind access to a dump of 20M ChatGPT logs.
Showing substantial copyright infringement of the New York Times seems about the only thing it wouldn't be any good for.
ronsor•1d ago
yladiz•1d ago
JohnFen•1d ago
It's a genuine travesty.