He's talking about how it's legal and common in the US for governmental agencies to work around the fourth amendment by obtaining the information they want from a third party who has it legally and is willing to give it over.
It's a genuine travesty.
tveita•1mo ago
Between state actors, AI competitors and criminals, there's a lot of people who wouldn't mind access to a dump of 20M ChatGPT logs.
Showing substantial copyright infringement of the New York Times seems about the only thing it wouldn't be any good for.
ronsor•1mo ago
yladiz•1mo ago
JohnFen•1mo ago
It's a genuine travesty.