Since OP is turning America's use of the term "rogue state" on itself, here is an interesting discussion on the etymology of the term :
> In the perception of the United States, “rogue states” [are] undeterrable and difficult to bargain with. Moreover, “rogue states” [hold] a fundamentally different vision of the international community[1]
Seems accurate. Taking moralizing and emotional baggage out of the equation, it's interesting to think about.
One of the earliest uses of the term "rogue states" was by then-NSA Anthony Lake (1994) who defined them as "recalcitrant and outlaw states that not only choose to remain outside the family but also assault its basic values."
So this is a question of how to frame the present struggle between a superpower (USA) and the EU/NWO/OWG ilk. Calling the USA a "rogue state" is also not new.[2]
CGMthrowaway•1d ago
> In the perception of the United States, “rogue states” [are] undeterrable and difficult to bargain with. Moreover, “rogue states” [hold] a fundamentally different vision of the international community[1]
Seems accurate. Taking moralizing and emotional baggage out of the equation, it's interesting to think about.
One of the earliest uses of the term "rogue states" was by then-NSA Anthony Lake (1994) who defined them as "recalcitrant and outlaw states that not only choose to remain outside the family but also assault its basic values."
So this is a question of how to frame the present struggle between a superpower (USA) and the EU/NWO/OWG ilk. Calling the USA a "rogue state" is also not new.[2]
[1]https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/display/10.1093/ac...
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_state