frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

The Greater Copenhagen Region could be your friend's next career move

https://www.greatercphregion.com/friend-recruiter-program
1•mooreds•10s ago•0 comments

Do Not Confirm – Fiction by OpenClaw

https://thedailymolt.substack.com/p/do-not-confirm
1•jamesjyu•37s ago•0 comments

The Analytical Profile of Peas

https://www.fossanalytics.com/en/news-articles/more-industries/the-analytical-profile-of-peas
1•mooreds•44s ago•0 comments

Hallucinations in GPT5 – Can models say "I don't know" (June 2025)

https://jobswithgpt.com/blog/llm-eval-hallucinations-t20-cricket/
1•sp1982•59s ago•0 comments

What AI is good for, according to developers

https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/what-ai-is-actually-good-for-according-to-developers/
1•mooreds•1m ago•0 comments

OpenAI might pivot to the "most addictive digital friend" or face extinction

https://twitter.com/lebed2045/status/2020184853271167186
1•lebed2045•2m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Know how your SaaS is doing in 30 seconds

https://anypanel.io
1•dasfelix•2m ago•0 comments

ClawdBot Ordered Me Lunch

https://nickalexander.org/drafts/auto-sandwich.html
1•nick007•3m ago•0 comments

What the News media thinks about your Indian stock investments

https://stocktrends.numerical.works/
1•mindaslab•4m ago•0 comments

Running Lua on a tiny console from 2001

https://ivie.codes/page/pokemon-mini-lua
1•Charmunk•5m ago•0 comments

Google and Microsoft Paying Creators $500K+ to Promote AI Tools

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/google-microsoft-pay-creators-500000-and-more-to-promote-ai.html
2•belter•7m ago•0 comments

New filtration technology could be game-changer in removal of PFAS

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jan/23/pfas-forever-chemicals-filtration
1•PaulHoule•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I saw this cool navigation reveal, so I made a simple HTML+CSS version

https://github.com/Momciloo/fun-with-clip-path
2•momciloo•9m ago•0 comments

Kinda Surprised by Seadance2's Moderation

https://seedanceai.me/
1•ri-vai•9m ago•2 comments

I Write Games in C (yes, C)

https://jonathanwhiting.com/writing/blog/games_in_c/
2•valyala•9m ago•0 comments

Django scales. Stop blaming the framework (part 1 of 3)

https://medium.com/@tk512/django-scales-stop-blaming-the-framework-part-1-of-3-a2b5b0ff811f
1•sgt•9m ago•0 comments

Malwarebytes Is Now in ChatGPT

https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/product/2026/02/scam-checking-just-got-easier-malwarebytes-is-n...
1•m-hodges•9m ago•0 comments

Thoughts on the job market in the age of LLMs

https://www.interconnects.ai/p/thoughts-on-the-hiring-market-in
1•gmays•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Stacky – certain block game clone

https://www.susmel.com/stacky/
2•Keyframe•13m ago•0 comments

AIII: A public benchmark for AI narrative and political independence

https://github.com/GRMPZQUIDOS/AIII
1•GRMPZ23•13m ago•0 comments

SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes

https://xorvoid.com/sectorc.html
2•valyala•14m ago•0 comments

The API Is a Dead End; Machines Need a Labor Economy

1•bot_uid_life•15m ago•0 comments

Digital Iris [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg_2MAgS_pE
1•Jyaif•16m ago•0 comments

New wave of GLP-1 drugs is coming–and they're stronger than Wegovy and Zepbound

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-glp-1-weight-loss-drugs-are-coming-and-theyre-stro...
4•randycupertino•18m ago•0 comments

Convert tempo (BPM) to millisecond durations for musical note subdivisions

https://brylie.music/apps/bpm-calculator/
1•brylie•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tasty A.F.

https://tastyaf.recipes/about
2•adammfrank•21m ago•0 comments

The Contagious Taste of Cancer

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/history-matters/contagious-taste-cancer
1•Thevet•22m ago•0 comments

U.S. Jobs Disappear at Fastest January Pace Since Great Recession

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikestunson/2026/02/05/us-jobs-disappear-at-fastest-january-pace-sin...
1•alephnerd•23m ago•1 comments

Bithumb mistakenly hands out $195M in Bitcoin to users in 'Random Box' giveaway

https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2026-02-07/business/finance/Crypto-exchange-Bithumb-mis...
1•giuliomagnifico•23m ago•0 comments

Beyond Agentic Coding

https://haskellforall.com/2026/02/beyond-agentic-coding
3•todsacerdoti•24m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Cancelled 2x Cursor Ultra plans, here's why

9•throwawayround•4w ago
Posting this because it took me way too long to figure out what was going on, and I wish I had seen a post like this earlier.

I just canceled two Cursor Ultra plans. My usage went from a steady ~$60–100/month to $500+ in a few days, projecting ~$1,600/month. Support told me this was “expected.”

I did not suddenly start doing 10x more work.

Cursor shows a 200k context window and says content is summarized to stay within limits. Pricing is shown as $ per million tokens. Based on that, I monitored my call count and thought I was being careful.

What I did not realise: - Cursor builds a very large hidden prompt state: conversation history, tool traces, agent state, extended reasoning, codebase context. - That state is prompt-cached. - On every call, the entire cached prefix is replayed. - Anthropic bills cache read tokens for every replay. - Cache reads are billed even if that content is later summarised or truncated before inference.

So the UI says “max 200k context”, but billing says otherwise

Concrete example from my usage:

MAX mode: off Actual user input: ~4k tokens Cache read tokens: ~21 million Total tokens billed: ~22 million Cost for one call: about $12

Claude never attended to 21M tokens. I still paid for them.

This was not just Opus. It happened with Sonnet too.

Support explained that this is exactly how the API is billed so there wasn't an error and I should just use these models more carefully as they could consume a lot of tokens when they are thinking. But there is a limit to that and what I was charged was way high. There is ZERO transparency about how the cache is used. And the cache breakpoints are decided by Cursor so I don't think it's fair to throw the ball to Anthropic here.

The dangerous part is that cost becomes decoupled from anything you can see or reason about as a user. You think you are operating inside a 200k window, but you are paying for a much larger hidden history being replayed over and over.

I am not claiming a bug in Anthropic’s API. This is a product transparency issue. If a tool can silently turn a few hundred dollars of usage into four figures because of hidden caching behaviour, users need much better visibility and controls. Support suggested spend controls but I am actually complaining about how my pre-paid package was consumed.

If you use Cursor with long-running chats, agents, or large codebases, check your cache read tokens carefully. The UI will not warn you. The only thing you will see is a few days into your subscription "Your are projected to run out of your usage allowance in a few days"

I canceled and moved on, giving Claude Code a shot until this is fixed. Posting so others do not find out the hard way.

Comments

techblueberry•4w ago
I'm curious about the people who are like "Look at my workflow, I run 10x agents at a time", are they just running 10k per month bills to their employer? In which case it's like "Neat, cool story bro"
throwawayround•4w ago
I keep tech bros flexing their coding agent bills every day. "I've spent 10k$ on Cursor today AMA"
bigyabai•4w ago
> I should just use these models more carefully as they could consume a lot of tokens when they are thinking.

Support is right. You cannot ever use a pay-as-you-go service unconsciously. This isn't an all-you-can-eat buffet, they're Tracfone minutes and you'll spend them accordingly.

If you can't square that mentally, maybe the big expensive models aren't a good match for your workflow.

throwawayround•4w ago
If you read my post carefully you can see that the problem is not the cost of the models or the way I use them but something that is not just hidden from the Cursor UI but misleading. It keeps displaying a 200k context limit and also uses summaries to manage the context. You can only see that it pulled 21M tokens worth of data from Anthropic cache for a 4000 token prompt if you export your usage as a csv and analyse.
bigyabai•4w ago
> It keeps displaying a 200k context limit

Some radiometers cap-out at 3.6 roentgen because they assumed that nobody would need a larger figure. That doesn't mean that 3.6 roentgen is the hard-limit on radiation, though.

Again - any PAYG product requires very explicit discipline to avoid getting smacked with a shady bill. AWS, Vercel or Claude.

throwawayround•4w ago
I think we’re talking past each other a bit.

This isn’t really about PAYG discipline or being surprised by a big bill. I had a spend cap. The problem is that, because of how Cursor implements caching, that prepaid usage got consumed in a way that was impossible to see or reason about ahead of time. I didn’t “overspend,” I just got far less actual work out of the same budget than I reasonably should have.

Also, the 200k context cap is a real cap. Claude does not attend to more than that. Cursor even summarizes aggressively to stay within it. The confusing part is that billing is driven by something else entirely: replaying cached prompt state that the UI implies is no longer relevant.

So from a user’s perspective, you’re operating inside a 200k window, MAX is off, prompts are small, and things look normal. Yet each call can still replay tens of millions of cached tokens that you never see and can’t inspect without exporting CSVs after the fact.

That’s very different from “you used more than you thought.” It’s more like the primary cost driver is invisible and contradicts the mental model the product presents. If the UI showed cache size or warned that a call would replay ~20M cached tokens, I’d agree this is just normal PAYG behavior. But it doesn’t.

That’s the issue I’m pointing out.

minimally•3w ago
I found out the hard way. I get a lot of value in cursor but I shouldn't be maxing out a 20x membership in a day of use...